[dp0622]

I thought faithless electors were rarer than a liberal with a brain.

This makes five now, no?! For hillary.

What was the most ever in an election before this?

[WayneS]

In what way was his protest a “never-Trump” vote? He was supposed to vote for Hillary Clinton, but he refused to do so. Wouldn’t that be a “never-Clinton” vote?

[heights]

Another deceitful headline. “Never-Trump”? How?

[BenLurkin]

Makes.no.sense

[VanDeKoik]

Looks like that celebrity video backfired.

[knighthawk]

What about the 20 electors that the law professor managed to change? I guess it was all liberal fantasy!

[Godebert]

The extremist left-wing radical democrats lose again!

Cue-up the new flood of YouTube videos with wailing feminist Ivy League college girls and effeminate beta-male marxist cucks.

Donald Trump was WRONG! I'll never get tired off winning!

[cgbg]

Oaths mean nothing to loony leftists.

[Gay State Conservative]

I’d chip in $10 (and maybe even $20) to this guy’s legal defense fund.

[samtheman]

I look at “faithless electors” — in EITHER party — as maximum criminals against democracy in the United States, in other words, traitors, guilty of treason.

[DouglasKC]

Notice how they make the headline seem like it was a vote against Trump when in reality he didn’t vote for Clinton?