Gay “Marriage”: Alabama Fights Against Judicial Activism from the U.S. Supreme Court

Last Days Watchman ^ | Julio Severo

[juliosevero]

Gay "Marriage": Alabama Fights Against Judicial Activism from the U.S. Supreme Court

By Julio Severo

The U.S. Supreme Court created homosexual "marriage" for Americans, virtually imposing this fake marriage and real gay tyranny on America last June.

And, as Franklin Graham said about Obama's reaction to this creation, "Right after the Supreme Court's decision to legalize same-sex marriage, he had the gall to disgrace the White House by lighting it up with the gay pride rainbow colors to celebrate. This is arrogantly flaunting sinful behavior in the face of Almighty God.' Graham is the president of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association.

Mat Staver, chairman of Liberty Counsel, said there is 'a growing number of voices calling for resistance to the lawless marriage opinion.'

"Supreme Court justices swear an oath to uphold the Constitution, not invent a new one," he said. "When they put their personal opinions in writing without one shred of constitutional support, the people have a right to question their authority."

When the Supreme Court decision was announced in June, Alabama did not, like other states, declare the issue resolved. The Alabama Supreme Court justices are resisting the judicial activism from the U.S. Supreme Court by upholding a law restricting marriage to opposite sex partners. For more information, read the WND report "Alabama gets serious in fight against 'gay' marriage," by Bob Unruh.

Resistance has been a hallmark of Alabama justices. Last year, pro-abortion activist Nina Martin labeled Alabama Supreme Court Justice Tom Parker as a man who "has figured out how to dismantle Roe v. Wade." According to her criticism, Parker is the biggest threat to abortion in this generation.

Abortion was granted federal legal acceptance, through the U.S. Supreme Court, under the administration of Republican President Richard Nixon in 1973. Since then, abortion has been allowed in the U.S. in all nine months of pregnancy and it has legally murdered over 60 million innocent Americans. Nixon did not fight fiercely against this judicial activism imposing capital punishment on the unborn. But he was the first U.S. president to resign because of political scandals.

Nixon's biggest scandal was that he was not the biggest threat to abortion in his generation. But now God has raised Justice Parker as a better resistance to abortion in the U.S. Supreme Court.

And now God is also raising Parker and his worthy company of Alabama justices as a better resistance to gay "marriage" in the U.S. Supreme Court.

Roy Moore, the current Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, is famous for not following orders from federal judges to remove a monument of the Ten Commandments from the Alabama Judicial Building in 2003. Both Moore and the monuments were removed from the building. But today he is again in the resistance.

Moore passionately embraces conservatism. Last July, he reacted when Facebook launched an app called "Let's Celebrate Pride," which allowed users to overlay an image of the homosexual rainbow over their profile picture. The Facebook celebration was in honor of the U.S. Supreme Court decision creating gay "marriage."

The strongest resistance came from conservative Russians, as reported by me in my article "Conservative Russians Give Moral Lesson to Facebook's Homosexual Propaganda," published in Barbwire.

As a good conservative, Justice Moore spread my article on his Facebook profile. His message was clear: He was against the pro-sodomy judicial activism from the U.S. Supreme Court. He was supportive of the Russian resistance to this activism and to the Facebook celebration.

I support the conservative resistance of the Alabama Supreme Court to the U.S. Supreme Court in its liberal measures to kill the unborn and the real marriage.

With information from WND.

Portuguese version of this article: "Casamento" gay: Alabama luta contra ativismo judicial do Supremo Tribunal dos EUA

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Tom Parker: the Biggest Threat to Abortion in this Generation, According to Pro-Abortion Critic

Conservative Russians Give Moral Lesson to Facebook's Homosexual Propaganda

U.S. Homosexual "Marriage" Will Affect Other Countries

[chesley]

We lose this battle everytime. Until some others join in and tell the SC where to stick it, why should we bother?

[VerySadAmerican]

I wish ISIS would put out a video stating they will attack us because we allow gay marriage.

[DaveyB]

I hope President Cruz appoints Roy Moore to the USSC!

[dp0622]

Why are states so afraid to break the law when obummer and jarrett do it ten times a day?

screw the feds and their laws.

I almost thought this was a republic for a minute.

Another issue as that at least some states that voted against gay marriage might be for with the HUGE amount of propaganda thrown their way. I’ve seen the attitude change in teens around here.

I tell them about the VD crisis. the suicide rate. many were abused as a child. etc.

[so_real]

Best post all day.

[juliosevero]

Thank you very much!

[EternalVigilance]

"Right after the Supreme Court's decision to legalize same-sex marriage..."

The supreme Court didn't "legalize" anything. They can't. Courts are not given the power to make laws. That power is reserved only to the legislative branch, and even then, those laws must conform to the laws of nature and nature's God and to the Constitution.

I wish people on "our side" would get their language right. They give away the whole battle when they use words that grant total power to the tyrants in black robes.

How will we ever win when people like Franklin Graham can't even get it right?

"You seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy...The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal..."

-- Thomas Jefferson, Letter to William Jarvis, Sept. 28, 1820

"I do not forget the position assumed by some that constitutional questions are to be decided by the Supreme Court, nor do I deny that such decisions must be binding in any case upon the parties to a suit as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high respect and consideration in all parallel cases by all other departments of the Government...At the same time, the candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the Government upon vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned their Government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."

-- Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1861

[Mechanicos]

Why do we fight? Because its the right thing to do.

[Jemian]

Ping

[DJ MacWoW]

We lose this battle everytime. Until some others join in and tell the SC where to stick it, why should we bother?

Silence is compliance.

[sergeantdave]

Key phrase:

“When the Supreme Court decision was announced in June...”

The decision is an opinion, not a legally binding dictate. The court cannot write law. Only the legislature can write law. If the legislature agrees that a judicial opinion is sound, then the legislature must pass a law to give that opinion the force of law.

It’s really that simple.

[LowOiL]

Love me some Roy Moore, now if he can just keep his wild stupid son on a leash so that he does the cause no more harm.

[JLS]

“We lose this battle everytime. Until some others join in and tell the SC where to stick it, why should we bother?”

Exactly, modern history is such that AL standing up to the Federal government is not going to fly. In fact it hurts the case. Such is being on the morally and historically wrong side of civil rights in such a visible way as standing in the door of UAL trying to fight a federal order.

Moore is either a fool not to recognize that or a demagogue who does not care about the cause but only was trying to push his political career by pulling the stunt he did. Moore is probably the single last person I would ever pull the lever for. Heck I might vote for Obama for an office over Moore.

[chesley]

Heck I might vote for Obama for an office over Moore/<>P I cannot tell you how repulsive I find that sentiment

[chesley]

We cab talk about it, But the SC loves to send in the troops when they think they are being defied.

[chesley]

Yes. Still there are smart ways to fight, and less smart ways. There are effective ways to fight and some not so much

Until America, all America, treats the Supreme Court with the Supreme Contempt that it deserves, we will get nowhere.

[DJ MacWoW]

SCOTUS doesn’t have the power to “send in troops”.

[chesley]

No? But the President does. And do you think for a second that he wouldn’t?

[DJ MacWoW]

No. I don't think Obama will send military troops. He can't send the National Guard. Only the Governor can.