Skip to comments.
Quentin Tarantino: boycotting my movie over my stupid comments violates my 1st Amendment rights
Canada Free Press ^
| 10/06/15
| Robert Laurie
Posted on 11/06/2015 8:09:17 AM PST by Sean_Anthony
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: Sean_Anthony
21
posted on
11/06/2015 8:43:37 AM PST
by
Celtic Conservative
(CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
To: Leaning Right
I respect your intentions in saying that, but I don't see how the cops are "stifling" anyone's rights. A boycott is not stifling, it's a time-honored non-violent response.People should boycott if they wish, that is their right of self-expression.
22
posted on
11/06/2015 8:44:43 AM PST
by
Zuben Elgenubi
(NOPe to GOPe - Yeb Arbusto es un payaso.)
To: Sean_Anthony
I wasn’t going to see it anyway. Is that violating his First Amendment rights too?
23
posted on
11/06/2015 8:47:00 AM PST
by
Southside_Chicago_Republican
(If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
To: Sean_Anthony
To: Sean_Anthony
Now we are OBLIGATED to watch his product, is that it?
25
posted on
11/06/2015 8:52:49 AM PST
by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: AlaskaErik
....and everything to do with ours. Boycotting is “speech” without words.
26
posted on
11/06/2015 8:53:52 AM PST
by
madison10
(If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter)
To: Sean_Anthony
Hard to boycott somebody when I’ve never watched any of his movies with no intention of doing so.
27
posted on
11/06/2015 8:55:06 AM PST
by
hattend
(Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
To: AlaskaErik
Right. Our not seeing a movie or listening to him has nothing to do with HIS 1st amendment rights.
If he really wanted to exercise his free speech, he could make his movies free. Not much chance of that.
The logical extension of his argument would have to be that if his 1st rights were violated, which they are not, he is perhaps due compensation. The only way he could collect is forcing people to watch his crap.
28
posted on
11/06/2015 8:55:51 AM PST
by
rey
To: Zuben Elgenubi
Excuse me? The First Amendment is about GOVERNMENT restricting speech.
Where, exactly, are his free speech rights being taken away by the government here?
To: Sean_Anthony
Consider your 1st amendment rights violated. I'll never watch another one of your movies.
To: Sean_Anthony
Well what about my first amendment right not to see it you ugly bastard
31
posted on
11/06/2015 9:01:14 AM PST
by
al baby
(Hi Mom)
To: Vic S
Quentin is free to be an idiot and spout any tripe he wants. . . as long as it doesn't incite violence and murder as many of the BLM flunkies do.
I'm also free to choose Leave It to Beaver reruns over his stupid films. There are some great family lessons taught in LITB. Quentin's films, not so much.
32
posted on
11/06/2015 9:04:43 AM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
To: SkyDancer
33
posted on
11/06/2015 9:05:07 AM PST
by
IncPen
(Not one single patriot in Washington, DC.)
To: Sean_Anthony
That’s not how it works, genius.
34
posted on
11/06/2015 9:06:34 AM PST
by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: I'd like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
To: Zuben Elgenubi
In my post #19, I argued that you were being unfair to the police union. Well, it turns out that you are correct after all.
From the Rolling Stone link at the bottom of my post:
Quentin Tarantino should expect a big "surprise" from the Fraternal Order of Police, the largest police union's executive director, Jim Pasco, told The Hollywood Reporter.
When a group with great power threatens you with a "surprise", that is over the line, way over the line. Disgusting, actually. So it looks like there are no good guys here.
http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/news/quentin-tarantino-has-surprise-coming-says-fraternal-order-of-police-20151105
35
posted on
11/06/2015 9:09:01 AM PST
by
Leaning Right
(Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: IncPen
To: Zuben Elgenubi
I can’t abide Tarantino or his movies but I agree with you - the cop unions are, in my opinion, far more dangerous to our liberties than any movie.
37
posted on
11/06/2015 9:14:27 AM PST
by
raybbr
(Obamacare needs a deatha panel)
To: Sean_Anthony
What he is saying is he has spoken and everybody else should shut up.
38
posted on
11/06/2015 9:25:55 AM PST
by
joshua c
(Please dont feed the liberals)
To: Sean_Anthony
What an ignorant POS. Boycotting his crapfest movies is also a 1st Amendment right.
39
posted on
11/06/2015 9:26:11 AM PST
by
RJS1950
(The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
To: Sean_Anthony
Who taught him the 1st Amendment...the Dixie Chicks?
40
posted on
11/06/2015 9:31:39 AM PST
by
fungoking
(Tis a pleasure to live in the Ozarks)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
