Breitbart to RNC: Stream it, baby, stream it!”

Canada Free Press ^ | 11/02/15 | Judi McLeod

[Sean_Anthony]

Could save America from a Hillary Clinton presidency that in reality is Obama’s coveted 3rd term in office

Within a few weeks from now, Barack and Michelle Obama will appear ‘live’ on their very own Christmas card,assuring a peaceful Christmas-seeking world how, down at heart, they really love the U.S., God and particularly the now all but depleted armed forces.

It’s called canned streaming and with today’s technology anybody can do it.

Breitbart’s savvy editor at large John Nolte’s version of streaming is one that could save America from a Hillary Clinton presidency that in reality is Obama’s coveted 3rd term in office.

[TexasCajun]

Matt Drudge to host:

Moderators:

Rush Limbaugh
Mark Levin
Allen West
Phyllis Schlafly

[Jane Long]

Oooh....that’s a great mod line-up, TC!!!

And, would love for Drudge to host and stream. It would be YUUUUGE!!

[j.argese]

Does anyone remember when Ross Perot talked about the “Electronic Town Hall”? Changes to liberty beyond the Founder’s wildest dreams are within our grasp.

[MNJohnnie]

FYI

[Cyman]

I was very critical of Dr Carson’s call for streaming on Facebook or Google but on Drudge???? A million thumbs up!!!

[Soul of the South]

“If you’re worried about older voters still uncomfortable with streaming, why not ask C-SPAN to carry it?”

Older voters, particularly those below age 75 are much more tech savvy than most people give them credit. Regardless, the GOP has a lock on the over 60 white vote unless they do something stupid on Social Security or nominate another left winger in sheeps clothing like Romney.

Since Lee Atwater died the Republican Party has been unable, or unwilling, to communicate a coherent, consistent, and compelling message to voters distinguishing the party from its supposed opposition. As a result the party place defense at the national level.

Social media and the internet has changed the game in terms of the delivery of messages. However, a weak or incoherent message is still a bad message. A message that isn’t consistent, and presented forcefully, over a period of months is also an ineffective message. Yes the Democrats have the advantage of Hollywood’s best image creators, as well as the mainstream media to fine tune and present their message. However, in today’s world it is possible for imaginative and creative communications professionals to make a huge impact by using the new media effectively. Effective use of new media also demonstrates to younger voters the party is current and future oriented. If Reince can’t see it, get someone else to head the party.

[UB355]

Content delivery is not the issue at all.

[sparklite2]

Phyllis has to be, what,
a hundred years old?

Tammy Bruce instead.

[RitaOK]

Phyliss still can rock Plymouth.

[sparklite2]

I see where Phyllis is 91 years old. Her rockin' days are over. How about

Andrea Tantaros

[i_robot73]

Oh, come now. We can’t have any ‘rogue’ ideas/plans getting into the public’s way of sports, DWtS, or Karsashians (sp? who cares) watching.

Why nobody in the party has an active page w/ each candidates action-plans for XYZ is still beyond me (Yeah, most are just bloviating @ssholes whom couldn’t string two thoughts together...).

The 21st C technology is a CON vs. the uniparty (especially the GOP); they actively keep the field DEAF and DUMB. Why rile up the base when ‘GOP good, DEM bad’ is all they need?

[RitaOK]

I getcha’, but Andrea is all paycheck, and paycheck comes from FOX, and FOX is aligned with the globals to take out Trump. FOX is dead to me.

Let’s look at Levin, Limbaugh and some Breitbart people. They are fox hole types who owe FOX nothing.

[norwaypinesavage]

Streaming it (only) is not a good idea. The people I know who most need to see the candidates unfiltered, won't watch it unless it can be selected with a remote from their recliner. If not there, they would wait until NBC, CBS, or ABC tells them what was said.

The candidates should hold the debate at a location of their choosing, with the hosts of their choosing. They should stream it directly, but also sell the feed to the highest bidding network. The income could be distributed to the candidates in the same proportion as was used to select their stage position. Then people can get a completely unfiltered debate from the feed, and the couch potatoes can also select it on their remotes.

[joesbucks]

Let’s go with this. My guess is that once it’s done, those who feel slighted will complain, still.

[nomad]

Been saying this for a while.