Posted on 10/17/2015 10:41:47 AM PDT by Isara
|
BLOWOUT! Ted Cruz vs. Dianne Feinstein (video)
The biggest take away from that exchange was that Tyrant Feinstein wasn’t going to be schooled on the constitution by Ted Cruz and the mask came off and the ugly inner commie came out and lashed out at Senator Cruz. She was so mad that she let the cat out of the bag and told the truth about what she really feels about the constitution by basically saying she as a Senator can supersede the constitution. They can’t take it and they know when they are cornered correctly they will lash out and lose it. Their house of cards fall flat. Cruz is bringing that same heat to the marxist media. They are boiling over just like Feinstein did….and their ears are bleeding from the piercing truth coming from Ted Cruz.
 |
“If you look at the Black Lives Matter movement, one of the most disturbing things is more than one of their protests have embraced rabid rhetoric, rabid anti-police language, literally suggesting and embracing and celebrating the murder of police officers,” the Texas senator said. “That is disgraceful.”
Cruz also talked about the “vilification of law enforcement” under the Obama administration, pointing to the death of Deputy Darren Goforth, who was shot and killed while he was filling his patrol car with gas in Houston, Texas. Cruz said he attended the sheriff’s funeral when the pastor talked about the mission of law enforcement to “deliver us from evil.”
DeRay McKesson, a leader in the Black Lives Matter movement, called Cruz’s accusation “desperate.” “Cruz aims to perpetuate lies about a movement focused on ending violence in order to garner attention,” he wrote in an email to ThinkProgress. “This desperate statement is another reminder that he is unfit to be the President of the United States.”
“It’s amazing to me that black people and their allies affirming that Black Lives Matter is somehow celebrating murder,” another leader, Johnetta “Netta” Elzie, told ThinkProgress. “Nothing about us affirming our own lives has anything to do with ’embracing and celebrating the murder of police officers.’”
When you see them react this way like they did at ThinkProgress, you know you have successfully placed yourself over the target and have all the fire power. Here’s another great example of the marxist media losing their ever loving mind over Ted Cruz’s audacity to tell the truth. This time it’s from the Boston Globe.
But it is Ted Cruz who has truly hit a new low.
In commenting on Tuesday’s Democratic presidential debate he derided it as “more socialism, more pacifism, more weakness, and less Constitution” and “a recipe to destroy a country.” He complained that “we’re seeing our freedoms taken away every day, and last night was an audition for who would wear the jackboot most vigorously” and “for who would embrace government power” for stripping away “your and my individual liberties.”
Let’s put aside the fact that wearing a jackboot most vigorously makes no sense; and that it’s pretty strange to call Democrats weak pacifists and then complain that they are jackbooted tyrants.
The real problem here is that Cruz’s language is verging on incitement. In a polarized political environment, in which Republicans increasingly view Democrats as illegitimate, to suggest that a Democratic win would lead to individual liberties being taken away and the country being destroyed is the height of irresponsibility.
Cruz is basically offering moral support to the angriest and most paranoid individuals who find a home in the Republican Party. Rather than toning down the country’s growing polarization, he’s throwing gasoline on the fire. And considering that the GOP has basically become the party of unfettered access to guns, Cruz’s rhetoric takes on an even more troubling hue.
The Marxist Media loves interviews with your typical elected Republican where they usually give half answers on topics like Black Lives Matter. The marxist media can continue to write about how the GOP doesn’t want to address race issues and they can continue that slow drip, drip, drip, false narrative all the way up to election day. Cruz gives them a direct answer and saves his hardest rehtoric for these hard left marxists. Why does he do this?
First off this is the fastest way to get your message out. It’s like a dog whistle for the Marxist Media. They sound the alarm and try to make headlines out of this. In their minds they think statements like this will sink Cruz. In reality it’s helping him gain traction and momentum and he knows it.
The main reason Cruz does this. Deep down inside Ted Cruz truly despises the left and what they stand for. Ted Cruz recognizes that this is not about some peripheral disagreement between parties on how to govern a country game that so many typical moderate get along Republicans play. He wants to defeat them and remove the cancer that they spread that is killing our country. Obama is not a nice guy he is a radical hateful revolutionary and Cruz wants him and his party soundly defeated. I think we got a glimpse of that take no prisoner attitude about the media from Ted Cruz in his very frank interview with Glenn Beck about how the media out to destroy us.
Ted Cruz: Media Will Filet You on the Front Pages (video)
As Cruz sees it, as sheeps among wolves it pays to be cynical. Speaking the truth skillfully is how you do it. Don’t think for a minute that the media and the democrat party hates you and wants nothing more to destroy you and everything you believe that made this country great. The marxist media thinks that their attacks will stick and their control of the narrative will stop Cruz and they can continue to protect the Demoncrat party. The truth with Cruz like Warden Norton in the Shawshank Redemption told Andy Dufresne when he paid Andy a threatening visit in detention…
“Nothing stops Cruz….Nothing….. and in the next 8 years of Ted Cruz’s term you will do the hardest time their is and Cruz won’t protect you from the conservatives…he will pull you out from The New York Times Building on the west side of midtown Manhattan and cast you down with the soddomites…you’ll feel like you’ve been screwed over by a train..NPR? Funding for the arts? Gone…sealed off ..torn down brick by brick we’ll have a newspaper burning bonfire inferno and dance around it like wild injuns…. flames so high that people will see it for miles….or am I being obtuse?”
Shawshank Redemption - Warden Norton - Isolation scene - Nothing Stops (video)
If a “Black lives matter” snake says he’s not fit to be president, then he’s my choice for president.
Indeed he does it so well, they’ve decided ignoring him is their best course of action.
“There’s no question that Ted Cruz is the best candidate in the field to defeat the media.”
Ted’s too late. Trump has already defeated them. Most recent examples:
1. CNBC just caved to Trump’s (and Carson’s) ultimatums regarding format changes.
2. NBC refuses to cave to La Raza’s “growing” demand to cancel Trump’s appearance on SNL.
3. Trump’s REPEATED public accusations that the media is biased, dishonest and liars.
Article reminded me of why I like Cruz and inspired me to send his campaign a hundred bucks. Cruz really is a force to be reckoned with. He whips the media every time he comes into contact with them.
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Budget, Spending & Debt |  |
 |
|
| Civil Liberties | |
|
 |
| Education | |
|
|
| Energy & Environment | |
|
|
| Foreign Policy & Defense | |
|
|
| Free Market | |
|
|
| Health Care & Entitlements | |
|
|
| Immigration | |
|
|
| Moral Issues | |
|
|
| Second Amendment | |
|
|
| Taxes, Economy & Trade | |
|
|
More at Conservative Review: https://www.conservativereview.com/2016-presidential-candidates
It's more than disgraceful, it's suicidal. We need police reform - military mindset and tactics, blasting people to bullet-riddled pulps at the drop off a hat, absolutely zero possibility of personal lawsuits for abuse of power, needs to stop.
But.
The police are THE most direct measurement of civilization. THEY ARE NOT OPTIONAL. And if you want to see the alternative, go to a socialist country and see what they are like. Cops not only need to be the good guys, they MUST be the good guys, and need to be worked with until they ARE the good guys, wherever there are problems. Yelling "f#ck the police" is equal to yelling "f#ck civilization." People need to grow the f#ck UP.
You can see it here David Gregory tried to help Schumer out but Cruz handled him too...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcmCFZZL7tM
It really is CRUZ or LOSE folks... nowadays saying such gets me labeled as a Trump hater, some conservatives have learned liberal Alinsky tactics all to well and seem to love it.
Well, this Boston Glob guy is right.
Democrats are certainly not pacifists, but they don't put the jackboot on the throats of their friends and allies, only on their enemy.
Unfortunately, the Democrats' enemy is the American people.
Yep, Trumps crazy free and fair market ideas will be the ruin of America.
The Man in Black’s life mattered.
Well played!
“It really is CRUZ or LOSE folks... nowadays saying such gets me labeled as a Trump hater, some conservatives have learned liberal Alinsky tactics all to well and seem to love it.”
Love Cruz. He is my guy, has been from the beginning, but I’ll take Trump. Best case scenario for me is Pres/VP in any order.
Have never seen an instance on FR where a Cruz supporter was labeled a Trump hater on the basis of supporting Cruz alone. Might want to examine that a little closer.
Ted is the candidate I hope gets the GOP nod!
It’s not that simple.
You are asking people to vote Cruz with the promise that he will be able to blow through the media and the GOPe while they are looking at Trump whom is already doing it and has for months. Wrecking Bush and disabling the press’s ability to control the narrative.
People are not going to just say “Thanks for sticking your neck out, Don. Now I’m going to go vote for Cruz because I saw a checklist on FR”.
Amen
Trump Hater!
But While Feinstein and Leahy and the rest are repugnant to me, intellectually dishonest as often intentionally as unintentionally, I do not see that video as an example of where Cruz beat them either rhetorically or on the merits of the argument.
Where am I wrong (I might be) ... ?
It IS, in fact, within the scope of Congress' power, to disallow certain books. For instance, a book full of pictures of kiddy porn or kiddy porn literature.
So this is not an example of a video I would send my silly liberal neighbors to say 'Here is Ted Cruz, why do you think he's irrational?'
What did I miss here?
Thanks for posting by the way - this is not a criticism of the post ... but perhaps criticism of the choice of exchange to demonstrate Cruz is right on the Constitution ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
