Posted on 10/12/2015 7:51:58 PM PDT by Isara
Results from a straw poll of libertarian Republicans highlight the senator’s shrewdness.
Even before the 2016 presidential election cycle began, most observers expected the race for the Republican nomination to be a war of attrition—especially compared to the Democratic primary, where Hillary Clinton was expected to enter the race as a nearly prohibitive frontrunner. And so back in March, when Ted Cruz announced his campaign for president, it was easy to infer that Texas’s junior senator would be planning for a long campaign that would leave him as the last candidate standing at the end of the GOP nomination fight. Cruz is shrewd. He wouldn’t have launched a campaign if he couldn’t see a path to victory.
And, for Cruz, the path wasn’t that hard to see. As I wrote then, the early polls didn’t seem auspicious: perhaps 4 percent of primary voters considered him their first choice, and Cruz was not the only candidate likely to compete as a conservative alternative to the party establishment. But several years of Republican infighting in Texas have already shown me that conservatives who oppose the establishment are united by their opposition, not their conservatism. The “Tea Party” is an umbrella term for a number of right-wing factions, which align on certain issues but are philosophically at odds on others. Cruz, unlike any of his likely rivals, had already navigated that tricky terrain, and therefore had a unique advantage. He might not be the first choice for pro-life voters, or for libertarians, but he could easily be the second: Rick Santorum endorsed him in his contested 2012 primary, as did Rand Paul. If he could outlast those candidates, he could have a good chance of rolling up their supporters along the way.
As I wrote in August, Cruz’s strategy became more complicated when Donald Trump barreled into the race and started throwing a temper tantrum, which has now been going on for months. As I noted last month, the strategy had shifted slightly, apparently in response to Trump’s continued popularity: Cruz had started offering occasional criticisms of unnamed “campaign conservatives,” rather than commending Trump while waiting for him to implode, as he had been doing. I continue to think that Cruz’s decision to cozy up to Trump was shockingly risky, in part because it was such a blatantly political calculation and in part because Trump remains the frontrunner, and his well-coddled supporters are comically defensive of their man. Last week, Cruz said that he doesn’t think Trump will be the nominee, and added that he, Cruz, plans to win “the lion’s share” of Trump’s supporters. As you can see in the comments section of the Breitbart story about the incident, many of Trump’s fans were outraged and aggrieved, as if they were somehow under the impression that Cruz, a United States senator who is running for the Republican presidential nomination, is trawling around Iowa looking for a chance to sacrifice his career on this golden altar.
In case there was any doubt, though, Cruz’s stated plans to roll up Trump’s supporters are explicit confirmation of his strategy. The Republican Liberty Caucus straw poll, held this weekend in New Hampshire, brought further confirmation that this is a shrewd strategy. The straw poll included 800 respondents who self-identify as libertarians or members of the Republican Party’s “liberty” wing, and used a methodology called “approval voting”: respondents were asked to name all the candidates they would vote for, rather than just one. Rand Paul won; 57 percent of the straw pollees said that they would vote for him. But Cruz had almost as much support: 51 percent said they would vote for him too. There was a steep drop-off for third place: just 17 percent of the liberty lovers who took part in the weekend’s proceedings said they would vote for Ben Carson. Most of the other candidates registered barely any support at all.
Straw polls, by their nature, are not particularly rigorous. No one should put too much weight on the Republican Liberty Caucus’s straw poll in particular, because one of its implications is that libertarians are too fractious to play a decisive role in presidential elections: Paul is clearly aligned with the libertarian wing of the party, and has made an assiduous effort to court libertarian Republicans, and yet he couldn’t win a supermajority of support among this self-selecting group of supposedly like-minded people.
More significant is that Paul didn’t even emerge from the straw poll as the dispositive leader of this faction. His campaign has been languishing anyway, and he doesn’t have an alternative base of support; if he can’t count on libertarian Republicans, he’s got no base that can keep him alive deep into the primary calendar. Conversely, the Republican Liberty Caucus’s straw poll is great news for Cruz. It’s a clear signal that he can plan on rolling up the lion’s share of Paul’s supporters at some point, as he was no doubt planning to do.
It’s also a signal that we need a nickname for Cruz’s 2016 strategy, because he’s clearly in this campaign for the long haul, and I don’t want to have to summarize his plan every time I write about him. Since he’s a Texan, we could call it the Tumbleweed, but that metaphor would imply that Cruz doesn’t have a focused trajectory, much less an end game. A more apt metaphor comes from the Katamari video games. Cruz is quietly rolling a small, Velcro-covered ball through the campaign, amassing more and more supporters along the way, until sooner or later he may have a boulder big enough to roll right into the general election.
Ted is still my first choice.
[He (Cruz) might not be the first choice for pro-life voters]
TED CRUZ has the strongest pro-life platform in the race for POTUS.
Ted Cruz is the best choice to restore a constitutional government.
Top 15 issues with Americans polled:
54% - The availability and affordability of healthcare
53% - The economy
51% - The possibility of future terrorist attacks in the U.S.
46% - The Social Security system
46% - The size and power of the federal government
46% - The way income and wealth are distributed in the U.S.
43% - Hunger and homelessness
43% - Crime and violence
39% - Illegal immigration
38% - Drug use
37% - Unemployment
34% - The quality of the environment
28% - The availability and affordability of energy
28% - Race relations
25% - Climate change
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/top-15-issues-americans-worried/story?id=29758744
If Ted Cruz wants to ascend into double digits from 6.7% in RCP average, he must focus on above issues.
Ted, yes.
Trump is making this fun though.
Me too, Cruz or lose
Hmmm...Romney won the nomination in 2012 because he was everyone’s second choice. I wonder if Cruz’s strategy is something similar?
bump to the top
Romney campaigned to suburban liberals
Ted Cruz is my first choice as well because he seems to well understand that the crisis in which we find ourselves is due to ignoring God and His ways. He made that very clear even at the beginning of his campaign. In most all other areas he has an equally sound perspective of what needs to be done.
My main concern at this point is that our system is so far gone and our defense vulnerability is so high that I wonder if elections will actually even take place. We are in a a very dangerous position at present and the main cause of that still remains...and we the people....are all responsible for that.
While it is not a link that I could really post as a "FReep this poll", I found it rather intelligent that the Cruz campaign would approach donors, and would-be donors (read as: "Stakeholders") for their opinions on the issues that matter the most in this election.
Ted Cruz is listening, where others seem to be talking. This is the reason why I am 100% behind Cruz and I am not distracted by DJT, like many seem to be.
Part of my attraction to Cruz is a matter of fundamentals. He has rock solid conservative values, and NOBODY can argue otherwise. Still, what really attracts me the most to Cruz is that he has been the only one of the bunch that has been (well maybe Rand Paul too) from Day One of his campaign, running as a Constitutional Conservative, set on limiting the overreach of power of the Federal Government.
That, to me is the TOP ISSUE. Everything else falls into place behind it when the Federal Government is limited in scope, power, and the ability to sustain itself by breaking the backs of the producers, the makers, and the creators of our society.
I look forward to the "Yes we can! Yes we can!" Hopey Changey schtick of DJT to wear thin... I hope so, at least, but am discouraged because the Marxist presently residing in the White House, won two campaigns pandering to the electorate, telling them exactly what they want to hear, exactly like DJT is doing now.
So...?
I can, TPA, Patriot Act.
Cruz and the Club for Growth.
No thanks...Senator.
Ugh.
"After witnessing several senators huddle on the floor the day of the TPA vote (on June 23), I suspected that to get their votes on TPA, Republican leadership had promised supporters of the Export-Import Bank a vote to reauthorize the bank before it winds down," he said."I cannot vote for TPA unless McConnell and Boehner both commit publicly to allow Ex-Im to expire -- and stay expired."
Cruz was near the top of my preference list until I came across his agenda to increase H1-B visa foreign workers FIVE FOLD. That told me everything. He is just another politician pushing the cheap labor express because his rich donors ordered him to.
If Cruz was independently rich and could self finance his campaign like Trump, he would indeed be the best candidate. But unfortunately Cruz must obey his ring masters.
Cruzin' to Victory.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.