Posted on 07/27/2015 12:01:38 PM PDT by DanMiller
Having been thoroughly schooled by Iran during the P5+1 nuke negotiations on the necessity for flexibility, the Obama Administration is now even better prepared to take on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
As North Korea and more recently Iran proved, sanctions are feeble devices for getting rogue nations to eliminate their nuclear weapons programs. Possibly effective in bringing such nations to the bargaining table, they tend to collapse as the negotiators come to understand the benefits their nations would realize by their elimination (the sanctions, not necessarily their nations).
According to a July 26th Washington Post article titled U.S. planning to press harder against North Korea on human rights,
After the Obama administrations groundbreaking nuclear deal with Iran, there have been calls to replicate that pact with North Korea, a rogue state that already has nuclear-weapons capability.The linked article also notes,From Washington to Beijing, analysts and policymakers have been talking about the agreement as a possible blueprint for negotiations with Pyongyang. [Emphasis added.]
But Kim Jong Uns regime has made it clear that it expects to be accepted as a nuclear power saying this month it is not interested in an Iran-style deal. The Obama administration is instead focusing on human rights to further isolate North Korea, encouraged by the outbursts this approach has elicited from Kims stubbornly recalcitrant regime apparently because the accusations cast aspersions at the leader and his legitimacy. [Emphasis added.]
There is a growing assumption that the North Koreans are not going to surrender their nukes, Andrei Lankov, a North Korea expert based in Seoul, said after recent meetings with officials in Washington. Human rights are Washingtons next political infatuation, he said.
Pyongyang this month denounced the United States for escalating its anti-North Korea campaign after Sung Kim, the U.S. special representative for North Korea policy said at a public forum that pressure is a very critical part of our approach to dealing with North Korea.The Norths state-run Korean Central News Agency reported afterward that pressure being persistently increased would simply harden North Koreas will to take tough counter-action against the United States.
North Korean representatives have been notably responsive at the United Nations to criticism of the countrys human rights record and of the leadership in particular, staging a number of protests at forums in New York. [Emphasis added.]
North Korea's increased responsiveness shows that nuke negotiations with it may well be even more successful than were those with Iran, giving Dear Leader Obama an even greater giant leap forward in His pursuit of foreign policy legacies.
Engagement with North Korea is becoming increasingly necessary. It has recently been reported that
the North has recently upgraded a missile platform and may be readying to launch a long-range missile around the time of a national anniversary in October.
In addition, North Korea is building a new high explosives assembly facility at its main Yongbyon nuclear complex. North Korea will probably use such explosives internally only for peaceful purposes, while (although not suggested by the linked article) preparing them for shipment elsewhere. Perhaps they may be sold to Iran and sent via diplomatic pouch to ensure safety.
Iran persuaded Washington, once "infatuated" with the "possible military dimensions" of Iran's nuclear program, that Iran itself should probe those dimensions, turn the results of its investigations over to the indefatigable UN watchdog (the International Atomic Energy Agency, a.k.a. "IAEA") and thereby negate all suspicions. Following that precedent, North Korea should itself investigate whether there are bases for allegations of its human rights violations. It should then, in no less timely fashion, turn any relevant information it finds over to the appropriate UN agency -- perhaps the Security Council, where all permanent members, including stellar human rights advocates Russia and China, have vetoes.
Despite the brilliance of its handling of the Iranian nuke program -- and the equal if not even greater brilliance of the plan to proceed with North Korea -- unsubstantiated rumors will be spread by warmongering hawks such as those who continue to challenge Obama's great victory over Iran. For example, it may be claimed that any DPRK officials who provide evidence of human rights violations will be executed by hungry dogs starved for the purpose.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCo5yR7N_Iw]
That is nonsense. Most of the dogs in North Korea are already starving. The over-inflated egos of any DPRK officials that cause them to blather irresponsibly about such things would simply be deflated by defensive antiaircraft weapons such as recently used on Defense Minister Hyon Yong Chol. It's the humane way to deal with those guilty of "disloyalty and showing disrespect to dictator Kim Jong Un." It would, in fact, be sufficient evidence of North Korea's respect for human rights (comparable Iran's) to terminate any further inquiry immediately.
If, as Obama claims, "99% of world" likes the Iran "deal," at least 200% will love a deal with North Korea under which it demonstrates its respect for human rights while promising not to use its nukes on any nation unless it wants to because Dear Leader Kim is upset. The trade potentials are equally mind-boggling and the deal will be no less a win-win situation for everyone than the "deal" with Iran!
And we will do the same with North Korea!
Clinton already made a deal with them, doesn’t anyone remember that?
lol
If the secret agreement in the Iran deal is that Iran has agreed not to test a nuke. And, I think it is!
Will we overlook even facilitate Iran getting North Korean nuclear weapons technology? (Not satire or irony.)
The North Koreans have already tested nukes.
Iranians need proven technology if they are agreeing not to test.
The North Koreans are p*ssed off because we gave Iran ten billion dollars to develop offensive nuclear weapons, and the North Koreans didn’t get a dime to develop theirs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.