-— But the deck is still stacked in favor of those at the top, she wrote in The Des Moines Register. -—
Seriously?
If you were a viable candidate, it would HAVE to be about you, you ignorant Hildebitch. Trying to be the stealth candidate with that wide ass, ugly face and trail of corruption is pure denial of reality.
The Four Big Fights
Sounds like something Madame Mao would say...
HARF! Or is it Grubered?
5.56mm
Because this doll isn't really about her:
Yes, it will be, Ms. Clinton. You and your husband ran the Clinton Foundation like what William Magear “Boss” Tweed did with Tammany Hall in New York City exactly 150 years ago. And we know the fate of Tweed—penniless and in jail.
excellent strategy on her part IF she doesn’t have serious primary challengers. She could lay low and avoid interviews. The blue states are a lock. The red states are a don’t care. They steal the purple states. Nowadays almost any hard left dem will win the presidency if they can stay on offense rather than defense. IF Hillary can avoid being on defense she may prevail. That is her only chance.
IF Hillary can avoid being on defense she may prevail. That is her only chance.
Another reason to avoid interviews, even a softball leftist interview, is accidentally saying something incriminating.
She’s right.
It is going to be about the Democrats favorite thing: “Free Stuff.” The Democrats want to go after wealth - not income - wealth.
How about making the campaign about the four murdered in Benghazi while the Queen was busy collecting donations and did nothing to protect the embassy and Zero slept?
She wishes...
A campaign that isn’t about a candidate is certainly something new in American politics. Two words, Hillary: Uranium One. And the $100 million you got for signing over 20% of the country’s uranium reserves to the Russians while you were Secretary of State. What about Uranium One, Hillary?