Posted on 04/11/2015 9:07:49 AM PDT by John Semmens
Ayatollah Khamenei, Irans supreme leader, characterized US President Barack Obamas statements about the agreement negotiated between the two countries as deceptive and evidence of devilish intentions.
Obamas assertion that Iran has agreed to ramp down its pursuit of nuclear weapons in exchange for a phasing out of economic sanctions is a lie, Khamenei said. What we have agreed to is this. First, all sanctions must be immediately ended. Once this happens we agree to refrain from engaging in any nuclear attacks until, in our judgment, circumstances for a favorable outcome warrant it. Most likely, circumstances wont be favorable for at least a few years.
US Secretary of State John Kerry sought to minimize any perceived discrepancy between the two sides, saying that Khameneis statement is within the bounds of the framework weve been constructing. We could quibble over which comes firstthe end of sanctions or Irans self-constraint as a nuclear poweror we could make the first concession as a step toward building good will.
Right now, Iran is conceding that there will be at least a few years before they launch any nuclear strikes, Kerry pointed out. This should ensure that nothing drastic happens during President Obamas remaining term. After that it will be up to his successor to devise a strategy for dealing with Iran.
In related news, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf dismissed warnings from former secretaries of state Henry Kissinger and George Schultz about the nuclear agreement the Obama Administration negotiated with Iran as lots of big words that few people will understand.
Kissinger and Schultz noted that the so-called agreement lacks any provisions for enforcement. Neither does it address Irans sponsorship of terrorisma behavior that will become a bigger problem once sanctions are lifted and Iran has more funds at hand to aid these groups.
Harf insisted that these concerns are irrelevant since Iran will not agree to inspections and reserves the sovereign right to use its resources as it deems best. For us to raise these issues would complicate the negotiations and make any agreement unlikely. We feel that it is better to have half a loaf than none.
if you missed any of this week's other semi-news/semi-satire posts you can find them at...
http://azconservative.org/2015/04/11/work-requirement-pares-maine-food-stamp-recipients/
Almost!
I always look at the author first because of you, John. Congratulations...lol
“”We feel that it is better to have half a loaf than none.””
Apparently the same can be said about State Department spokespersons - half a brain is better than none....
Did I forget to acknowledge this was satire..can’t fool me...
No half loaf there, only crumbs for the pissants.
LOL, not bad !
That's funny too, the ‘Half a loaf’ line is more recently used by Ted Cruz, I heard him interviewed tonight on a radio show.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.