Posted on 10/01/2014 7:34:59 AM PDT by fredericbastiat1
Just as todays opinion makers seek to divorce Islam from its impact for example brutal conquest, forced conversion, religiously-sanctioned sex slavery, beheadings past opinion makers worked equally hard to divorce communism from its impact for example, brutal conquest, forced collectivization, concentration camps or gulags, mass murder. And this worked.
Unlike Nazism, Communism has never been judged guilty or even held responsible for the carnage and suffering it has caused. On the contrary, it remains a source of liberal, statist ideas...
...these belief systems [Communism and Islamic supremacism], both hostile to our Constitutional liberties remain protected by silence. This silence has already cost hundreds of thousands of American lives in our time. It started right after 9/11 as soon as President Bush declared Islam was a religion of peace, officially delinking Islam from specifically Islamic jihad. Official policy to this day absolves Islam of jihad, and most recently absolves Islam of the jihadists known as the Islamic State.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
This is why we have folks such as Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, and many others who are getting the TRUTH out NOW.
Leftists love the jihadis because both leftists and jihadis really want to destroy this country and build it up again as a totalitarian state.
That effort to rebuild WILL FAIL because of just anger “blowback.”.
The left just wants to see representatives of the old order suffer; they are confident that they can seize power when it finally collapses. The parallels also to Zimbabwe/Rhodesia and South Africa are striking.
They FORGET that unlike those two countries in Afrca, AMERICANS are LOCK and LOADED, if you get my drift.
And we will face a 70 year battle with it, in spots all over the globe, just like with Communism too.
In his introduction to Dianas brief speech, Mr Gaffeny mentioned Ms. Wests syndicated column from last week:
For logic-minded Americans still genuinely puzzled as to how it could be that our presidents and secretaries of state and generals and pundits keep hammering home the big lie that Islam has nothing to do with jihad, that the religion of conquest is a religion of peace, I have a special warning. Such widespread, politics- and mass-media-driven brainwashing is nothing new.
Just as todays opinion-makers seek to divorce Islam from its impact for example, brutal conquest, forced conversion, religiously sanctioned sex slavery, beheadings past opinion-makers worked equally hard to divorce communism from its impact for example, brutal conquest, forced collectivization, concentration camps (Gulags), mass murder.
[...]
The more I continue to learn about the extensive penetration by Stalins secret agents into the federal government over the two decades that FDR and then Harry Truman held the Oval Office, the clearer it is that the American ship of state had too many hands loyal to the USSR pushing at the rudder, influencing, to varying degrees, the direction of U.S. policy and strategy, even if not especially during World War II.
Such is the once-hidden history that comes into closer focus since the U.S. and Russian governments released some subset of their vast secret archives intelligence documents, FBI files and the like. Reigning court historians keep looking the other way, hoping Americans never notice the big picture: that FDR presided over the biggest national security disaster in U.S. history, the massive infiltration of the U.S. government by agents of a foreign power.
Ken Burns new PBS documentary, The Roosevelts, typifies this blackout. For example, take the series treatment of the Yalta Conference, the final meeting of the so-called Big Three wartime leaders. Old news footage shows the conference table, from Stalin to FDR to Churchill. The camera also shows a man who sure looks like Soviet military intelligence agent and U.S. State Department official Alger Hiss. Next to him is top White House aide and, according to some experts, Soviet agent or asset Harry Hopkins. Both men are seated behind the dupe-ish secretary of state Edward Stettinius.
Does Burns inform viewers of the identities of these notorious figures seemingly boring from within before the viewers eyes? Does he note the existence of scholarship confirming covert agent Hiss outspoken role at the conference, and evidence that he may have exerted influence over deliberations on China policy, war reparations including German slave labor, and other vital issues in the USSRs favor? Is there any mention of the troubling questions about Hopkins single-mindedly pro-Soviet stance that caused George C. Marshall to describe Hopkins job with the president as being to represent the Russian interests?
Silence. Or rather, Burnsian chatter about the big secret of Yalta being FDRs grave health something obvious to anyone who looked at him. The series ultimate mission is accomplished, however. A re-gilded FDR is burnished to a starry sheen, blinding a worshipful audience.
Diana West could have kept quiet. She couldve written a historical account of those years that was in alignment with the Narrative of Lies were all taught in government schools. It sure wouldve been easier to go with the flow than it has been to stand athwart The Lie, demanding truth for a change.
Shes right: history narratives like the one Ken Burns told will blind us to the point that we wont recognize truth anymore.
Truth is too scary, too alarming for regular folks to be permitted to see. So the history architects continue to build risible domestic workplace violence walls around the ugly reality of Islams random beheadings. Nothing to see here especially if youre blind.
Remember that FDR had a pack of Communists and Communist sympathisers in his circle.
Why is the group CAIR even allowed to operate in this country? We never had the equivalent in WW2 for the Germans or Japanese.
This is how it works.
They tell us what they are going to do to us, a short time later they do it, and our government makes a excuse that what they did was not really what they said they would do so it was not them that did it.
ISLAMIZATION OF THE WORLD
Heres a valid wake up call to all those who think it cant happen.
Christians use to be the great majority in Lebanon. In the Middle East, the cradle of Christianity, almost no Christian are allow to remain living in the home of their Christian ancestors by the Muslim majority.
Here is a perspective by Dr. Peter Hammond. Dr. Hammonds doctorate is in Theology. He was born in Capetown in 1960, grew up in Rhodesia and converted to Christianity in 1977.
Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammonds book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat:
Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life. Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.
Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges. When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well..
Heres how it works:
As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:
United States Muslim 0.6%
Australia Muslim 1.5%
Canada Muslim 1.9%
China Muslim 1.8%
Italy Muslim 1.5%
Norway Muslim 1.8%
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:
Denmark Muslim 2%
Germany Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom Muslim 2.7%
Spain Muslim 4%
Thailand Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves along with threats for failure to comply.
This is occurring in:
France Muslim 8%
Philippines Muslims 5%
Sweden Muslim 5%
Switzerland Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law.
The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world. When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions.
In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:
Guyana Muslim 10%
India Muslim 13.4%
Israel Muslim 16%
Kenya Muslim 10%
Russia Muslim 15%
After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:
Ethiopia Muslim 32.8%
At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
Bosnia Muslim 40%
Chad Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon Muslim 59.7%
From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:
Albania Muslim 70%
Malaysia Muslim 60.4%
Qatar Muslim 77.5%
Sudan Muslim 70%
After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:
Bangladesh Muslim 83%
Egypt Muslim 90%
Gaza Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia Muslim 86.1%
Iran Muslim 98%
Iraq Muslim 97%
Jordan Muslim 92%
Morocco Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan Muslim 97%
Palestine Muslim 99%
Syria Muslim 90%
Tajikistan Muslim 90%
Turkey Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates Muslim 96%
100% will usher in the peace of Dar-es-Salaam the Islamic House of Peace.. Here theres supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:
Afghanistan Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia Muslim 100%
Somalia Muslim 100%
Yemen Muslim 100%
Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.
Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel. Leon Uris, The Haj
It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos.
There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death.
Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate. Todays 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the worlds population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the worlds population by the end of this century.
Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammonds book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat
I’ve known about communism since a lad, and spent 10 years active military service, during The Cold War.
During that active time, I learned just how batty those mohammedan buzzards are, when the Siamese brand of that bunch, blew up a few places in Bangkok, one of which I just walked from, in 1972.
I know about both, and it is many of those “aw-come-on-it can’t-be-as-bad-as-that” thinkers, that are doing their due diligence, to paint that cheesy white fencepost picture of both of these deadly ideologies.
Riddle: How many communists can You fit on a church pew?
Answer: About ten fat arse union members.
Heck, I wish that 1/5 of the world's population didn't follow this crazy "prophet," but they do. Denying it won't change anything.
dear flyash,
As to your riddle:
“Riddle: How many communists can You fit on a church pew?”
Do you mean ‘sitting’, or ‘post-bullet Pancho Villa prone’?
My answer would be: “As many as the wood would support!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.