Posted on 09/17/2014 8:14:30 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Meanwhile, Ebola is far more frightening and deadly than ISIS decapitation. Just ask Barack Obama.
While he patently ignores dread diseases being brought into America over an unprotected southern border, waiting it out until midterm elections are over before delivery of government-stamped amnesty, who can really believe that President Barack Obama will deliver the world from Ebola?
So immersed is Obama in reinventing himself as ‘World Savior from Ebola’, he came up with first-time-in-six-years kudos for America yesterday: In thanking “everybody here at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for welcoming him, Obama said:
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
When the expression was coined, “It takes a village”, I had no idea that Obama could turn it into a weapon to destroy America.
” - - - This sounds like a plan if you are Obama hiding the real truth of Benghazi and hunting down the world spotlight weeks before midterm elections. - - - “
BINGO!
The most dangerous virus known to man can get exponentially more dangerous the more people who are exposed to it. Keep it contained and it has less chance of mutating into something that will wipe out humanity. It seems to me that Obama is working to help the virus evolve.
Recall dear leader's display of filial affection for the King of Saud?
Infected hajji’s are a real threat to the Saudi Kingdom and their credibility as guardians of Islam’s holy places.
There have been documented incidents of travellers exposed to Ebola travelling to neighboring countries and flying out from non-Ebola related airports.
Ebola is a game changer for Saudi Arabia, hence the sudden shift in Obama’s plan for military placement.
That African Leaders summit a few months back was not just a bunch of rulers having lunch and golf! That was Obama saying, "I bring these 3,000 martyrs to you in your struggle"
We certainly wouldn’t find out at that point. Maybe if the death toll became impossible to coverup or there were whistleblowers to let us know...but any military deaths or infections will be regarded as national security items and the public will never be told...
Why 3000? To equal the death toll for 9/11?
They would have a very hard time concealing deaths of GIs.
The VA would be happy to help.
‘Accidents’ happen.
The family needn’t know the cause of death. Just ask those SEAL’s on SEAL team six, whose bodies were cremated in spite of the family’s wishes.
No, the Ebola deaths of regular GIs who are sent to Africa for this Ebola mission, would be very difficult to conceal from their families, and hometowns, and media, and fellow soldiers.
You can’t hide the deaths of these ordinary troops who ship to the Ebola area and then never return.
What can soldiers do there? It’s stupid to send soldiers. But it shows 0’s priorities.
The SEAL’s returned.
In jars.
The families will never know what precisely killed them.
‘Accidents’ covers a lot of mortality causes.
These aren’t SEALs shot down on a combat mission.
To have ordinary GIs and support troops on a no-combat humanitarian mission living in garrison and comfort and among their fellow regular troops and cell phones, and laptops, be exposed, become infected, be isolated and treated, die, and the bodies handled as Ebola bodies after death, is not going to be able to be kept secret.
Even if someone wanted to do so.
“These aren’t SEALs shot down on a combat mission.”
Wow. Obtuse much?
The military cremated remains contrary to the family’s wishes. They could very easily do it again. Regardless of where and how the troop died.
The families will have no clue what killed their kin. Or even if the ashes in the jar are really the remains of their kin.
The military will conceal such infections until such a time as they’re no longer concealable. Particularly if revealing the presence of said infections violates some previously unstated rules of PC or political expediency.
Do you really expect the military to come clean about such a thing? Just from matters of national security. Imagine what terror organizations could do with the information that it was possible to infect even ONE us military troop? National security will be used to justify such illnesses as they occur until such a point as they’re no longer concealable.
Do you really think our military will run right out to press organizations and announce that ‘private so and so has contracted ebola, is being treated for it and is in stable condition’? Really?
I wonder if you know much about life in the military.
To have ordinary support troops and regular GIs living together on a no-combat humanitarian mission living in garrison and comfort and among their fellow regular troops and cell phones, and laptops, first be exposed, and then become infected, then have to be isolated and treated, and then either shipped home as a survivor which most would be, or die and then the body be handled as an Ebola body after death, is not going to be able to be kept secret.
I wonder if YOU know anything about the military.
Yes or no, do you think the military will call a press conference the very first time one of their troop gets ebola?
They will try to contain it. Only if they are unsuccessful and the numbers become too big to contain will they let the cat out of the bag.
Wouldn’t it be a coup for a terror organization to find out it was possible for even one US troop to contract ebola? Think of the PR nightmare involved...
The early symptoms are those of malaria or even lassa. How on earth would any troop know for certain they’d contracted ebola?
I can just see it now, General so and so calls a press conference and alerts ISIS that US troop are easily infected with ebola. Can’t you see this too? /s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
