Why not give them the Noble Peace prize?
Wondering if beheading a captured hostage is evil or not?
No wonder. This is coming from somebody who thinks ripping the limbs off unborn babies is a civil right.
No wonder CNN’s ratings have tanked. Nothing but idiots there.
Foley probably thought they were not evil too. That kind of mentality will
get people beheaded and behead a dumb ass network, as well.
“Understanding” my rear end. I’m not even gonna read the whole article.
They are 7th century barbarians.
Is it Muslim?
Then the answer is really quite obvious.
It is mind blowing how this pea-brained journo, a pure excretionary product of modern liberalism thinks he can ‘understand’ something as raw and barbaric as Islam in its true form. It is like a dog trying to understand a snake.
I would never have believed that the world could get so upside down!
Hmmm, that’s too difficult. What about the important questions?
Like, should it be called ISIS, or ISIL?
Tie that arrogant bastard to a chair and force him to watch the beheading.
THEN, force him to watch these cretins rape a goat.
Then, make him write an article about that.
According to the Left, there is no God or, if there is a God, He’s an egotistical, judgmental bigot not worthy of worshiping. Once you take God out of the equation, you remove any ultimate authority for “good” and “evil”.
Therefore, there is no evil without a God to tell us it’s evil. So how can one judge an act as evil without acknowledging a higher authority? That’s why the Left has such a difficult time calling anything or anyone “evil” because they, themselves, don’t want to consider God’s judgement for their own evil (abortion, homosexuality, etc.) even when that evil is blatantly obvious.
Wow - Mr. Dawes is SO far above the rest of us. He’s simply rises above the pettiness of recognizing evil as evil.
Golly gee. Do you think someday that even I can be as enlightened as you Mr. Dawes?
Maybe CNN should hire one of their spokes people...just for the ratings you understand.
The media didn’t care when ISIS murdered thousands of Christians, but chop one reporter’s head off, and they panic.
I guess that depends on your definition of the word Evil.
Most on the hard left don’t want to label anything as having a definite unambiguous quality. i.e. It’s not Rape-rape”.
I remember Rush once saying that the liberal mind cannot conceive of good and evil. They think in terms of right and wrong. Thus, if they’re for the “right” cause it doesn’t matter how they achieve it. ISIS is just trying to achieve their cause and this is an instant where one liberal cannot comprehend another’s action because of their thinking. But they certainly can’t call it evil.
Dare I say by definition above, all terrorists are liberals and liberals are terrorists. The only difference is the matter of degree.