Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

I am 54 as of last February. I will bet anyone here a nice, reasonably-priced steak dinner that by my 60th birthday polygamy will be legal in more than two states.
1 posted on 07/01/2014 12:58:31 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

A gay Mohammadan ?


2 posted on 07/01/2014 1:01:51 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
common sense ruling that Indiana’s ban on same-sex marriage, like bans in most jurisdictions, has no rational basis so it was thrown out as unconstitutional.

In other words, if voters vote for something that's irrational, it's automatically unconstitutional?

Funny, my copy doesn't mention that. In theory it sounds like a good idea, but what happens when you have irrational judges deciding what is or isn't rational?

3 posted on 07/01/2014 1:02:27 PM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I will be 50 this coming February. I'm willing to bet that before I turn 53, there will be open rebellion in this nation, if not all-out civil war. This sh!t can't keep going like this. Something's gotta give.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

4 posted on 07/01/2014 1:03:06 PM PDT by wku man (Veterans, it's up to us to save the Republic...let's roll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

5 posted on 07/01/2014 1:04:54 PM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Hey Abdul - you know that allah’s gonna getcha for that, right?


8 posted on 07/01/2014 1:11:20 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I am also very secure in my sexual identity so I don’t spend all day complaining and obsessing over what my neighbors do behind closed doors.

The author is living in fantasy world of 10 years ago.

Ten years ago all 'they' wanted was to be left alone, to do their abominable acts in the privacy of their own homes.

Today ... that is not good enough

Now if you are a baker you must be forced to bake them a cake; if you are a pastor you must never call them to repentance or you will be in jail; if you a counselor you must never try to cure them. This is a far cry from "leave us alone."

The author has his head up his liberal rear end believing that all they want is "equality." Thinking people understand that is not what they want ...

9 posted on 07/01/2014 1:12:53 PM PDT by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
I also don’t worry about someone trying to use this ruling to marry their pet iguana or trying to engage in polygamy with an exponent because those arguments are just silly.

That's what they said about the phag marriage arguments, too.

10 posted on 07/01/2014 1:13:05 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
if the critics of same-sex marriage would spend as much time working on their own marriages as they do freaking out over someone else’s maybe they could live happily ever after too.

Since my one and only, completely original female wife and I(an unaltered male)have been happily married for 37 years I think I can say with some authority that same sex marriages are not real marriages but only a cheap imitation of the real thing.

14 posted on 07/01/2014 2:06:56 PM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Indiana’s ban on same-sex marriage, like bans in most jurisdictions, has no rational basis so it was thrown out as unconstitutional.

Granted that homosexual marriage supporters won't buy our "Bible thumping", but the health risks are a rational basis for banning homosexual marriage. That is the same basis for restricting smoking. What is our side waiting for?

17 posted on 07/01/2014 3:54:21 PM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (See my home page for some of my answers to the left's talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think the lawsuit that will enable polygamy will come when three men or three women want to marry each other. I just don’t see the liberal courts ruling in favor of heterosexuals no matter what the topic is.


21 posted on 07/01/2014 4:54:01 PM PDT by MeganC (Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I don’t get it and frankly never have.

Of course you don't get it, "Abdul Hakim-Shabazz, esquire". That's why you're a slave on the Democrat plantation, an Obuttwipe worshipper, and a party to every filthy piece of treason and corruption that has denigrated our country for the past six years.

22 posted on 07/01/2014 5:02:08 PM PDT by workerbee (The President of the United States is PUBLIC ENEMY #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Pack o’ lies and misrepresentations and weaselings etc.

My proverbial keyboard has long ago been waterproofed.

Until Truth is brought back into the picture, the Lies will carry the day. And it turns out Truth is a person.


26 posted on 07/01/2014 5:15:24 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson