Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/30/2013 10:02:03 AM PST by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Starman417

Watching a regime(s) implode is not for the squeamish.

Karma is a b*tch.

Dem candidates have a tough choice..

Dumb or Dumber.


2 posted on 12/30/2013 10:07:30 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

There isn’t enough whitewash on the face of the earth to cover Hillarys and Obama’s faults in the Benghazi affair.

That is not to anyone who can actually think for themselves. As for the others they aren’t bothered to care.
They eat whatever manure is fed to them by the Obama liberal Hillary,propaganda arm.


3 posted on 12/30/2013 10:09:32 AM PST by Venturer (Half Staff the Flag of the US for Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417; 1_Rain_Drop; 2111USMC; 2ndDivisionVet; Absolutely Nobama; acapesket; ...
"Dismiss" do they? Where the hell do they think they are? Kindergarten? Even kindergartners can smell bull$hit!

Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise me or Republicanprofessor.


4 posted on 12/30/2013 10:10:03 AM PST by MestaMachine (My caps work. You gotta earn them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417
When liberals are out of power, they can claim the moral high ground with all kinds of theoretical solutions to real problems, safe in the knowledge that they won't have to defend their nutty ideas because no one is going to be stupid enough to try them.

When they're in power, they have to put up... and because we live in a country with freedom of speech, they can't make the opposition shut up.

Because of that, their constant struggle against reality gets more and more ridiculous and obvious. They retreat into their anti-reality bubble, drawing their friends and supporters around themselves in a hive-like swarm.

6 posted on 12/30/2013 10:21:21 AM PST by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

Senator Clinton voted for the Iraq war, just like Senator Obama did. Funny how the libs ignore this, but hated bush Bush for doing it.


9 posted on 12/30/2013 10:54:00 AM PST by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

The Old Gray Whore apparently got one of the two memos:

1) She Who Must Not Be Named has been selected to run in 2016;

2) They did NOT get the memo that Odinga is trashing the 22nd Amendment and will be running for his third term...


10 posted on 12/30/2013 11:00:42 AM PST by Old Sarge (And Good Evening, Agent Smith, wherever you are...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

Those New York Times writers are well-paid by the Democrats. How is bringing up Benghazi good for Hillary? Three Republican members of Congress recently went to Libya and Egypt. It wasn’t for sightseeing. The Democrats are scared s**tless. This Democrat administration has been playing loose and sloppy. Could be that they supported Al Qaeda. Now, supporting our enemy is the very definition of treason. Treason gets you hung. These jackasses in this administration may have fooled around and drawn a death sentence for themselves. The Democrats can’t change who is involved or the definition of treason. The only thing they can do is try to say that Al Qaeda really isn’t an enemy. This is serious. It’s not about protecting Hillary’s behind. It’s about keeping her from getting hung. Watch out.


11 posted on 12/30/2013 11:15:37 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

NYT had no credibility.


12 posted on 12/30/2013 11:30:10 AM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

You would think the New York Times would choose to go out with some dignity intact... but that appears to be not the case.

When are the next round of lay offs coming?


14 posted on 12/30/2013 11:57:16 AM PST by GOPJ ("Remember who the real enemy is... ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

15 posted on 12/30/2013 11:59:09 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

16 posted on 12/30/2013 11:59:32 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

Why does anybody give a rats ass what the NY Times has to say about anything?
Any body with even half a brain knows that the only thing the rag is good for is kindling for the fire place.


23 posted on 12/30/2013 12:50:41 PM PST by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

the story is what matters not the truth.

the NYT is selling its reputation to liberal doners as being able to fool the serfs.


25 posted on 12/30/2013 4:10:30 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson