New group trying to straighten out the Boy Scouts- Gay Scouts question badly misses the point

Coach is Right ^ | 7/12/03 | Derrick Hollenbeck

[Oldpuppymax]

In a backlash to the Boy Scouts of America’s (BSA) decision to embrace the presence of openly Gay scouts in its ranks, a new group which has not yet named itself, has announced it will begin to operate as an alternative to the BSA starting next January 1st.

Using lofty phrases like “character development” the new group declared it will be generally modeled on Christian principles of chastity outside of marriages between one man and one woman. New Group (NG) will meet in Nashville in September to address what it says are the concerns of “tens of thousands” of individual scouts, scout leaders and sponsoring organizations troubled by the BSA’s sharp lurch to the left on this crucial issue.

New Group’s proclaimed mission will be to “guide generations of courageous young men to...

[fwdude]

I wasn’t aware that the OnMyHonor new organization was going to allow boys with same-sex attraction as long as they don’t act on it. This is a faulty foundation to build on.

[fella]

Openly gay means sexually active something boys should not be especially Boy scouts.

[buffaloguy]

I think it may be a very good foundation on which to build. parents may wish to put their gender confused boys in with a bunch of regular kids to see if that changes them a bit. As long as they keep it hidden I don’t see any harm.

Modeling themselves on the Heritage Girls (American Heritage Girls?)is a good start as they are a quality organization.

More power to them.

[BeadCounter]

All I know is there are already some groups out there like the National Royal Rangers.

[Pollster1]

Openly gay means sexually active something boys should not be especially Boy scouts.

Openly straight does not mean sexually active. I know a lot of married men who are openly straight but . . .

Why would openly gay automatically mean they are acting on that urge?