Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/06/2013 7:25:55 PM PDT by Lexi Cory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lexi Cory

Great points! This is not about background checks, but rather a national registry, which we should resist at all costs. A disarmed nation is no longer free.


2 posted on 05/06/2013 7:32:16 PM PDT by calif_reaganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lexi Cory

Did you know that a felon cannot be charged with the crime of possessing an unregistered firearm (in states where there is a registry).


3 posted on 05/06/2013 7:35:53 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lexi Cory

Good points in this article. Most opposition to gun control follows typical paths - constitutionality, no new laws because we don’t enforce existing ones, etc. Nothing wrong with that.

But I wish we had some congressmen with gonads that would go on offense instead of defense. Where are the top 20 violent crime cities in the US and which party runs them? What is the marital status of most violent criminals and what type families do these criminals come from?

The liberals and their policies are responsible for a large percentage of violent crime in our society.


4 posted on 05/06/2013 7:37:07 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lexi Cory

Bttt.


5 posted on 05/06/2013 7:58:26 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

6 posted on 05/06/2013 8:00:32 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lexi Cory
As the text points out - universal background check really isn't about universal background checks. The name/label is completely misleading.

First, it is hardly "universal" criminals will continue to ignore it like they do existing background check laws, other firearms related laws, and oh yeah, laws in general.

Second, while it will only target law abiding citizens, it cannot possibly work without a national registry of all existing firearms. All firearms. How else could anyone possibly know who is supposed to have what (or not) and who may have transfered which firearm to whom.

Third, it is insanely intrusive. (at least the parts of a State proposal I've heard) You cannot "transfer" your firearms to someone for more than 72 hrs without a background check. Going on vacation for a week? Going to have the neighbor's kid watch your pets while you're gone? Don't think so. Your trusted friend going for a long weekend hunting with his son, wants to borrow one of your rifles for his son? Sorry, not without a background check. You going to deploy to the sandbox, leave your personal weapons with spouse? Nope, not without a background check. Meanwhile of course real criminals will continue to buy/sell/trade firearms like gifts at a white elephant party.

Universal background check? Stop lying you gun-grabbing wanna-be fascists.

7 posted on 05/06/2013 8:42:23 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lexi Cory; All
We will not save our Second Amendment right within our broken government. Our government is beyond repair. We will never be able to take a step forward without taking 3 steps back. Our tyrannical government is full of people who literally hate our Constitution. It's not a problem that just started recently, but one started decades ago. We haven't been able to stop it, and it's not possible to stop without a government collapse at this point.

That's something we need to realize. This started a long time before Obama. It's what allowed him into the position he's in, and it's why he's been able to step it up to the level he has. Any victory we have within our broken government, is just buying us a little more time in a losing battle.

www.OathKeepers.org

8 posted on 05/06/2013 9:32:05 PM PDT by ThermoNuclearWarrior (Jeffrey Earnhardt to drive Oath Keepers car at June 1, NASCAR race in Dover - WWW.OATHKEEPERS.ORG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lexi Cory

Yeah, I love how when the Dems are talking about how hard it is to get new anti-rights legislation passed, they point to the failure of UBC, as if that would be expected to be far more palatable than an “assault weapon” ban. As in “See how intransigent those GOP NRA lackeys are? They won’t even go for background checks!” Idiots. In fact, background checks and the resulting registry are far more insidious than bans or restrictions on specific classes of weapons.


9 posted on 05/06/2013 11:04:37 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lexi Cory

ping


10 posted on 05/07/2013 12:07:03 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lexi Cory
If UBC's were around at the time of the founding of this nation, the Founding Fathers would have been hanged with that information.
11 posted on 05/07/2013 3:43:20 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson