Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

I've been out of the DUFUing loop for about a month and a half. Too much to do to DUFU. But now I may be able to shake the rust off and get back into the routine, as time permits.
1 posted on 04/22/2013 10:36:11 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: PJ-Comix; Xenalyte; RMDupree; AlexW; CzarNicky; Mike Fieschko; motzman; codercpc; thingumbob; ...

PING!


2 posted on 04/22/2013 10:38:04 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Back in the DUFUing saddle again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson

Top 5


3 posted on 04/22/2013 10:39:26 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson
The only question now is whether we're talking about religious theocrats, white-supremacists or anti-government/anti-taxers.

Oh, that's just negative-Nancy pessimism. It COULD be ALL THREE!!!

Or, they could just do what that a-hole over at HuffPo did and declare the two Chechen brothers "honorary conservatives".

6 posted on 04/22/2013 10:43:25 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson

Thank you Charles! I was hoping you would get to this!

Oh! And Top 10!


7 posted on 04/22/2013 10:53:42 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson

Ha! I hope these libtards are enjoying their crow sandwiches.


8 posted on 04/22/2013 10:57:20 AM PDT by matt1234 (The NRA: Redefining "Too big to fail.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson
What a pack of losers, and who is that guy again? He's almost funny if his dreck didn't anger me so...

I begin to suspect the libtards have only one functional brain cell between the lot of them and so they have to share it, and it makes them all regurgitate the same leftist spew. They all sound alike to me. :)

9 posted on 04/22/2013 10:58:05 AM PDT by W. (It's five o'clock somewhere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson

This is a bit terrifying.


10 posted on 04/22/2013 10:58:05 AM PDT by douginthearmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson
but I want to go down there WITH EVERY FIBER OF MY BEING.

...and shoot every madre-koit carrying a Gadsden Flag with my ill-gotten assault rifle.

Goes without saying...

11 posted on 04/22/2013 11:00:00 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alteration: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson
I don't have to be respectful of these murderous reptiles that have repeatedly
called for violence against us for daring to vote, daring to challenge them,
daring to claim our civil rights.


No, that would be your fringe element who does this, and the Islamic/Muslim people
you crouch behind hoping to do the dirty work for you. Wait until Blacks start
voting Conservative. I Can hardly wait to read that post.

12 posted on 04/22/2013 11:02:50 AM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson
Top 0? Well of course it is no matter how late I show up.

Will you be posting a DUmmies FUnnies of their reactions after it was revealed that Rush Limbaugh wasn't branching out from EIB to IED?

13 posted on 04/22/2013 11:05:19 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Choose one: the yellow and black flag of the Tea Party or the white flag of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson
This had all the earmarks of a rightwing terrorist attack. It wasn't. But that doesn't change the fact that it had all the earmarks of one. . . . it still had TONS of evidence pointing to it being a rightwing terrorist attack. The fact that it was not does not change that fact.

Yes, this is a typical prog fallback position: "I was completely and utterly wrong to suspect the opposition, but the mere fact that my first instinct was to suspect them is an indictment* of them, not me."

* In the rhetorical sense, not the 24-business-hour sense

14 posted on 04/22/2013 11:06:31 AM PDT by kevkrom (If a wise man has an argument with a foolish man, the fool only rages or laughs...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson

Any follow-up threads?

I looked over there (about to get in the shower — EWWW). NOTHING about the muslim scum and very little about Boston in general.


16 posted on 04/22/2013 11:09:05 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (LBJ declared war on poverty and lost. Barack Obama declared war on prosperity and won. /csmusaret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson

This had all the earmarks of a rightwing terrorist attack. It wasn’t. But that doesn’t change the fact that it had all the earmarks of one. . . . it still had TONS of evidence pointing to it being a rightwing terrorist attack. The fact that it was not does not change that fact.


It had all the earmarks of an attack from Mars. But it wasn’t.

No, it had tons of HOPEFUL SPECULATION, neither “evidence” nor “fact”.

Evidence is and remains that Muslim Chechens perpetrated the attack. Facts and evidence support each other: eyewitnesses, videos, still photos, social media postings, IEDs. Neither evidence nor facts are emotional, subjective or politically correct.

They have so changed the language that it is impossible to have a discussion, let alone one about legalities and reality.


17 posted on 04/22/2013 11:11:38 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson

Funniest thing I’ve read in a while. Thank you.


20 posted on 04/22/2013 11:21:00 AM PDT by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson

Gotta love the deductive reasoning of the DUmmies.

Step 1. Discount the obvious.

Step 2. Blame righty with zero evidence.


22 posted on 04/22/2013 11:25:16 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson
I'd be willing to bet you a shiny new dime that this is some far-right-wing, White (likely White Supremacist), Teabagger Militia group.

This is what happens when liberals are forced to bet with their own money.

23 posted on 04/22/2013 11:30:27 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Blather. Reince. Repeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson
Pitt just got me thinking. In Saudi Arabia I had devout Muslims tell me that the greatest gift a father can give his kids is Islam. So for leftists wouldn't the greatest gift be increasingly high taxes?
24 posted on 04/22/2013 11:39:07 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson

I’m only half way through this DUFU but i just had to scroll down to post at what a fine job you and the DUmmies have done here Charles.
After a so far semi-miserable day i am now laughing my butt off and wiping tears from my eyes!
Thanks!

Hey Pitt, Boston is “My Town” too you pretentious bore.
I wonder if the owner of Bukowski Tavern ever wonders why he has no business except for Pitt....


25 posted on 04/22/2013 11:49:26 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson

“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”


28 posted on 04/22/2013 12:02:36 PM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Henrickson
don't have to be respectful to a group of violent savages that are guilty of sedition and treason.

treason?, like violating and attempting to further subvert the US Constitution? ...called for violence against us for daring to vote, daring to challenge them, daring to claim our civil rights

like the 2nd Amendment?, that right?

I wonder if these tools understand the meaning of the words 'Constitutional Republic' ?

30 posted on 04/22/2013 12:13:09 PM PDT by NativeSon ( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the Disco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson