Replies

This had all the earmarks of a rightwing terrorist attack. It wasn't. But that doesn't change the fact that it had all the earmarks of one. . . . it still had TONS of evidence pointing to it being a rightwing terrorist attack. The fact that it was not does not change that fact.

Yes, this is a typical prog fallback position: "I was completely and utterly wrong to suspect the opposition, but the mere fact that my first instinct was to suspect them is an indictment^* of them, not me."

^* In the rhetorical sense, not the 24-business-hour sense

14 posted on 04/22/2013 11:06:31 AM PDT by kevkrom (If a wise man has an argument with a foolish man, the fool only rages or laughs...)

:: the fact that it had all the earmarks of one. . . The fact that it was not does not change that fact. ::

Obviously not a rhetoric student or math major.

Seriously, read that again, critically.

This DUmmie is saying that “the facts of reality” should never be substituted for real facts.

ummm...huh?

19 posted on 04/22/2013 11:12:07 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alteration: The acronym explains the science.)