Why Boston was attacked is only hard to figure out if we deny the truth

Coach is Right ^ | 4/22/13 | Derrick Hollenbeck

[Oldpuppymax]

Since last week when the Obama Administration and its media were forced to acknowledge the bombing in Boston was a terrorist act NOT carried out by the TEA party or the Klu Klux Klan, but rather by adherent Muslims, we have heard a stream of verbal gymnastics trying to absolve the murderers and somehow blame America for the carnage in Boston.

We’ve heard from the Muslim apologist crowd – bearded fake intellectuals with pipes, elbow patches and the like – speaking in a halting meter to make it seem like every word is worth carving on Mount Rushmore.

Their sophistry, saying “who radicalized them?” and “young men struggling to fit into a strange new culture” or “just young men trying to be heard” does us no good.

What we need now is...

[runfree]

The Boston marathon was attacked because it was a soft target and the bombs were positioned to go off in front of many live television cameras and press photographers. Where else could that be easily done? They didn’t put the bombs past the finish line because the cameras were pointed the other way.

To what end? I have no idea.

[353FMG]

>They don’t even really want to ask, “Who radicalized them?”<

.
ANY muslim can be easily radicalized if they believe in the murderous teachings of the Koran.

[presently no screen name]

I keep laughing at the MSM that keep repeating “we don’t know the motive”

"The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full." John 10:10

Hey MSM, the perp is evil and the motive is to destroy and it will use any pound of flesh who listens to evil/satan to get the job done! Now back to your mic and repeat this over the airwaves.

[presently no screen name]

Stop studying these vermin

Yep, it's only to take the focus off of 'what they did' by studying 'why they did it'. Diversion tactic.