Skip to comments.Why Boston was attacked is only hard to figure out if we deny the truth
Posted on 04/22/2013 8:54:41 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
Since last week when the Obama Administration and its media were forced to acknowledge the bombing in Boston was a terrorist act NOT carried out by the TEA party or the Klu Klux Klan, but rather by adherent Muslims, we have heard a stream of verbal gymnastics trying to absolve the murderers and somehow blame America for the carnage in Boston.
Weve heard from the Muslim apologist crowd bearded fake intellectuals with pipes, elbow patches and the like speaking in a halting meter to make it seem like every word is worth carving on Mount Rushmore.
Their sophistry, saying who radicalized them? and young men struggling to fit into a strange new culture or just young men trying to be heard does us no good.
What we need now is...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Look at the 2001 track record of their emerald Logan Airport. That should give you a clue.
Muzzies know what would happen should they attack a truly conservative city.
OPPORTUNITY fit the weapon.
[[Why Boston was attacked is only hard to figure out if we deny the truth]]
It’s only difficult if a person is an idiot liberal
I keep laughing at the MSM that keep repeating “we don’t know the motive” It’s so pathetic.
!! omg we are screwed.
They don’t even really want to ask, “Who radicalized them?”
It’s an important question, actually, and the answer would be “Saudis”.
We’re going to have more of this until we really ask and answer this question.
The people asking this, now, are merely asking in order to provide their own answers as deflection.
Now we’ve done it! “Right Wing Nuts and Teabaggers” are to blame for a Muslim woman allegedly being punched in the shoulder and sworn at in Malden. The allegedly happened on Commercial Street near the Orange Line “T” station. It is also where City Hall, the Police Station, two banks, four Lunch trucks all were at this time of day and there were NO witnesses.
I keep hearing that, but I don’t buy it.
Boston is a good scapegoat because it is a northeastern liberal city.
There’s a reason they are called “soft targets.”
Yes, the Boston Marathon was a great soft target.
Also,it happened to be the location of the saudi national who my suspicion is bankrolled the operation and gave the go order.
Boston is also full of liberals who thought that with the Messiah in the white house and Deval Patrick in the state house that they were safe and well loved by their government.
“I keep laughing at the MSM that keep repeating we dont know the motive Its so pathetic.
!! omg we are screwed.”
Very well stated! Remember liberalism is a brain disease akin to retardism. They are innately wrong about everything. The only advantage they have is numbers of teat-sucking dependents!
I keep telling my liberal acquaintances that I don’t give a rip for their motives, they are enemies and/or traitors to this country.
Stop studying these vermin and exterminate them with extreme prejudice. I am sick of people worming around the fact that younger murderer was a citizen. I point out that getting a citizenship to these muslim trash has but one purpose, get you assimilated so you can move freely.
Now, if you said that they attacked Boston because they viewed the politicians and much of the population as competitors for the same ideological space, I could buy that!
The truth is, the article wasn’t about why they attacked Boston specifically, the article was about why they did it at all, geography or target aside.
The author is spot on, and it goes to the heart of liberalism: Nobody is “bad”, it is their environment (poverty, geography, ect) or experiences (racism, perceived persecution, ect) in their lives that “made” them “bad”.
Conservatives understand that a lot of evil is done by evil people, and helped along by weak-minded people who knowingly and unknowingly assist them.
Liberals don’t really believe people ARE evil (unless you are a conservative, Christian, or tea partyer) and they don’t believe people are weak-minded. Liberals believe that is far too “judgmental”, since everyone has the same capability for thought, but some have had their capability for rational thought suppressed because they didn’t go to a Head Start program or were a victim of poverty, racism, (insert something else here, like “conservatism” or “christianity”)
Allowing backpacks on site? Take a tip from Times Square on NYears Eve.
I didn't get more specific:
Useful liberal idiots think that way. Committed liberals DO believe that people are weak-minded, only not themselves and their close associates.
Why was Boston attacked? Stupid question to ask.
It’s these guys neighborhood. Few who do such a thing, at least non-trained guys (which we don’t yet know for sure) leave familiar ground.
my tagline is worth it — BAN ISLAM!!
The Boston marathon was attacked because it was a soft target and the bombs were positioned to go off in front of many live television cameras and press photographers. Where else could that be easily done? They didn’t put the bombs past the finish line because the cameras were pointed the other way.
To what end? I have no idea.
>They dont even really want to ask, Who radicalized them?<
ANY muslim can be easily radicalized if they believe in the murderous teachings of the Koran.
"The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full." John 10:10
Hey MSM, the perp is evil and the motive is to destroy and it will use any pound of flesh who listens to evil/satan to get the job done! Now back to your mic and repeat this over the airwaves.
Yep, it's only to take the focus off of 'what they did' by studying 'why they did it'. Diversion tactic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.