Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Toomey: Background Checks Are Not Gun Control
RCP Video ^ | 4-10-2013

Posted on 04/10/2013 4:54:19 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: Poor Richard

“Sadly, I am from Pennsylvania and I voted for this double crossing bozo.

That won’t happen again.”

I did too, won’t do it again.


41 posted on 04/10/2013 6:39:54 PM PDT by depenzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Did anyone ask Toomey how this law would have prevented Newtown?

Or ask Obama? Or Biden?

Does anyone in the “journalism” business do their jobs anymore?


42 posted on 04/10/2013 6:54:29 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Toomey’s argument is the same one pushed for police DUI roadblocks. Take a look at the police reports. You’ll find a ratio of 20/1 non-DUI but, high fine citations to DUIs.

We’re just searching for the criminal element.

The truth is criminals will commit crimes, including illegal gun transfers/ownership.

The solution is end the background checks completely. Criminals will get guns. If the honest also are armed, then the criminals will suffer.


43 posted on 04/10/2013 6:57:17 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

I just hit the bastard’s Facebook page. f’n traitor, unprincipled politician.


44 posted on 04/10/2013 7:00:09 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA (Molon Labe - Shall not be questioned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Toomey got into self-destruct mode and forgot to abort it.


45 posted on 04/10/2013 7:14:19 PM PDT by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Learn three chords and you, too, can be a Rock Star!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

When I was a kid, we used to call this behavior by “Elected Officials” TREASON.


46 posted on 04/10/2013 8:53:11 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

It is surely a most serious violation of their oaths of office!


47 posted on 04/10/2013 9:24:12 PM PDT by faithhopecharity (()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

>>> Did anyone ask Toomey how this law would have prevented Newtown?

Not in the ‘press conference’ that I saw. He is going to face his constituents, hope some one bring it up. Multiple times. Until the knucklehead finally ‘GETS IT’

>>> Or ask Obama? Or Biden? <<<

Pfffttttt, you are kidding me, right?


48 posted on 04/11/2013 4:08:10 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson