Skip to comments.Supreme Court to conference on Obama eligibility today
Posted on 02/15/2013 9:09:12 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
Today, February 15, 2013, Attorney Orly Taitz brings her request to move the Obama eligibility challenge from conference to the oral hearing stage at the US Supreme Court. She is moving forward in spite of the fact that four African-American Supreme Court clerks refused to allow Taitz to see the signature of Justice Anthony Kennedy who denied her petition originally. But I resubmitted to Justice Roberts, and he sent it to the conference, Taitz said. (1)
The California attorney is asking
how do we know that he (Kennedy) ever saw the brief? In no uncertain terms clerk James Baldin told me that I (Taitz) [was] not allowed to see the signature. This denial of her right to see Kennedys signature does not make any sense. Perhaps her...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
They DO NOT want this issue addressed
HE IS A FAKE INFILTRATOR AND THEY KNOW IT
Why else would they go through such lengths NOT TO show a lousy birth certificate ( and the fact that the one they did release is a provable phony should have outraged EVERYONE )
She's fixed on the obvious flaw in the "decision" to keep her away from the Supers.
What if your parents sat you down and said, "You're adopted and not of our blood", got up and walked away.
Would you accept that?
There isn’t a court in this land that overturn an election.
Even CJ Roberts said that an election trumps the Constitution (ObamaCare)
Also, get Nancy Pelosi under Oath and ask her why she changed the wording in her certification of 0bama as eligible when she was Speaker of the House. She removed the words "under the provisions of the Constitution of the United States of America" EXCEPT FOR HAWAII'S CERTIFICATION, SHE LEFT THAT IN.. WHY, NANCY? BECAUSE YOU KNEW 0BAMA WASN'T ELIGIBLE DIDN'T YA NANCY!!!!
There is no law of the land...There’s only the law of the priviledged.....
Even if the SC vote all-zip, the barry is not illegible to serve - so what?
There is no one in any body or court that will do anything about it, whatever that might be.
I beleive that THE ONLY chance anyone has of proving some type of identity fraud if the obviously altered Selective Service registration Obamugabe is using.
The changes are juvenile and glaring. Oabma’s only “out” will be to say that he is older (fits an earlier website that says he is 4 years older) and that he didn’t register in oppositional protest to the VN war.
The press will give him a pass (just as the “dodgers of canada” were given a pass).
Good luck with that.
Look, up in the sky, it's flying PIGS!
Which of the above will we see first?
HIS IQ IS OFF THE CHARTS!
If Osama 0bama dies in office, it will be from old age, probably in about 2035.
The fact that our court system refuses to hold a full trial for this issue is proof enough that it is known fact that Obama is not eligible
If you look at all the idiot cases that go to full trial in all various courts in this nation....we cannot get one court to hear a case brought forth by a US citizen dealing with the eligibility of the President? BS
Obama owns 5 votes on the court. We all know that.
The way the state run media covers for this Marxist a-hole is just sickening.
If he doesn't declare himself dictator for life, I fear we'll just get another Soros lackey in 2016 to complete the destruction of the Republic.
Yeah, right. This crap will be on Monday's loser list, "denied without comment" --the same fate of every other birther case that has crossed the Supreme's desk. It's amazing people still get all excited over this stuff.
They have got the goods on the fraud, Obama. It’s time to act accordingly and throw him out of office and into a prison cell and those who helped him.
You get on a plane for a long trip. You put your life in the hands of the airline and crew. Halfway there, you ask the stew if the guy in the cockpit is REALLY a pilot.
Why has ROBERTS, and not some other judge, put this case in conference? What is going ON in this court?
The only branch of the Federal Government with the power and authority to remove a sitting President for crimes, per the U.S.Constitution, is the legislative branch - Congress.
The power and authority to remove a usurper via Quo warranto was delegated, by Congress, to the District Court, Washington, D.C.
Even worse. Before and after the flight takes off, the pilot is seen on the body of the plane tearing apart its engine, the stewards, FAA, and company owner all swear that it doesn’t matter whether the pilot is really a pilot and not a hijacker, and the passengers all say, “OK” and go back to watching the in-flight film. The media (and some Freepers) attack those who point out the sabotage underway. When law enforcement points out the sabotage underway they are also attacked.
Watching Hillary pull off that ‘actress of the year’ stunt REALLY REALLY REALLY TICKED ME OFF, because it was a clear sign that she was attempting to beat back further probing of team 0bama’s COVER-UP or downplaying of the attack so as to shield 0bama from damage to his re-election.. 0bama pulled the SAME stunt with Romney in the debate where he feigned anger because of Romney’s ‘act of terror’ challenge. The same psychology was in play here, compliments of Axelrod or Jarrett. How they let Hillary just walk away after her dramatic play act is beyond me.
Thomas already admitted they were “evading” the issue.
That was the intent of their alinsky tactics here at freerepublic.
They were quite successful.
Of course, having the admin mods in their corner was also helpful.
Ha! They say: “Well, actually he isn’t a pilot, but he’s REALLY, REALLY cool and it says on his resume that he’s real smart!”
Only, in this case, you asked prior to even boarding the plane.
Others joined in and asked as the plane was taxiing to the runway and yet more joined in asking for verification prior to takeoff.
The crew informed each asking, that their questions were frivolous and that they had no right in asking those questions to begin with. Some were even told that they would not receive the complimentary in-flight snack/beverages as a penalty for daring to ask such a question.
Even if they do evade the issue today, it would be kinda nice to set up a protocol for reasonable consideration in the future - literally every court has declared that all candidates, voters, citizens have no standing to contest any of the constitutional eligibility restrictions... and that’s just ridiculous. It’s hardly an unreasonable request.
“.....The power and authority to remove a usurper via Quo warranto was delegated, by Congress, to the District Court, Washington, D.C.......”
Anybody try a quo warranto method yet?
I don’t want a President Biden but Obama was never legally qualified to hold the office of President because he was not Natural Born. His father was a citizen of Kenya at the time of his birth.
“She is moving forward in spite of the fact that four African-American Supreme Court clerks refused to allow Taitz to see the signature of Justice Anthony Kennedy who denied her petition originally.”
“When school students touring the buildings came up to the Taitz group to ask questions, their teacher was said to have made them leave! (2)”
Two extremely relevant factors in the case against Obama and leaves many questions unanswered.
Who were the for African American clerks who denied Taitz her constitute all right to see Justice Kennedy’s signature and what were they wearing that day?
And who exactly was this school teacher who told her students to leave when the students began to ask questions?
Was it really a school teacher and were the others really students? Could it be that the teacher was really a member of the Trilateral Commission and just perhaps the students were North Korean avatars?
I don’t know.
That looks like an Obama double. LOL
He wouldn’t need to use fake docs if the info on them was correct....
Orly Taitz tried Quo Warranto in 2010 (Taitz v Obama). It was dismissed.
Montgomery Blair Sibley has another Quo Warranto suit also being heard in conference at SCOTUS today. It also was dismissed by the lower courts and by the SCOTUS in a previous incarnation. (ex-rel. Sibley v Obama).
Not a surprising comment coming from you, Drew. Interesting how you have no respect for the birther movement yet you post on the birther threads regularly. Most people just ignore what they consider idiocy and move along. I often wonder what might be your motivation....
Are you kidding? Orly Taitz is nothing if not entertaining! I swear, her birther crusade could be a Coen Brothers' film.
I don’t wonder at all.
Real conservatives who care about the Constitution and don’t think his eligibility will ever be addressed just don’t post on these threads.
Anyone who thinks his eligibility (or rather, lack of it) is a non-issue as in not important, or that there is no doubt about it, are neither conservative nor do they care about the Constiution or rule of law.
The Powers That Be in DC and the national security apparatus may have gamed out the various scenarios where "Obama" is outed as the fraud he is and concluded the risk of the country's destruction is too great For such to be allowed to happen.
For myself however, I pray every day that he and his handlers and enablers are exposed for all to see, and in spectacular fashion.
"if you have integrity, nothing else matters. If you don't have integrity, nothing else matters."
Applies to the rule of law also.
Folks appear to be confused about Noonan v Bowen. First, and most importantly, this is NOT an appeal of a lawsuit to the Supreme Court. It is an Application for a Stay. Please take a look at the actual Supreme Court Docket:
Most folks are familiar with the Supreme Court issuing Stays of Execution in capital murder cases. The stay being requested in Noonan v Bowen is to stop the certification of California’s Electoral votes until the California Secretary of State has vetted Barack Obama. Of course, the problem with that is that the California Electoral votes have already been certified. Granting Ms. Taitz’s application for a stay now would be like granting a stay of execution after the prisoner has already been executed.
The reason that this application went to Justice Kennedy first is because it is a California application and Justice Kennedy is the regional Supreme Court Justice for California, each of the justices handles applications from a different region of the nation.
Once the regional Justice has rejected an application, the Respondee has the option of submitting it to each of the other Justices, but usually a denied application is submitted secondly to the Chief Justice who then submits it to the full Court for a Friday Justices’ Conference.
Unlike a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (a request to have the full court rule of an appeal) an application for a stay or an injunction requires the approval of five Justices in order to be granted. Writs of Certiorari require four Justices’ concurrence.
Francis McDormand could pull it off...and probably win an Oscar for her turn as deranged dentist Orly Taitz.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.