Ignore Lena Dunham's 'Girls' at Your Own Peril, Conservatives

Breitbart's Big Hollywood ^ | January 29, 2013 | Kurt Schlichter

[Darnright]

>Boomers have never been the libs youngsters love to bash them for. <

Agree. The Nixon/McGovern race was the 1st election in which I cast a vote. I remember a lot of people talking about ending the war, but my vote for Nixon was in large part an, “Oh HELL NO!” vote against McGovern. My parents followed suit and I grew up in a solidly conservative democrat household.

[GeronL]

It is still a pornographic, leftwing show

[tdscpa]

Lena Dunham?

Obama maternal relative?

[Impy]

Who’s running it now?

[Impy]

Tell us how you really feel. ;)

This Lena Dunham is extremely self important for someone I only first heard of a few weeks ago. Should should really put a cork in it.

Brian Williams, that’s pretty creepy.

[Prospero]

I read this article last week, and I understand the author's point completely. But he's dead wrong. First, when we cede the language we lose the argument, going out the gate. Basically he's saying, in the Culture War, such as it is, the Lost Girls of the Left, in this case, HBO controls the high ground of the battlefield, and in this case the Left gets to choose the ground.

Nonsense. All the Right has to do is stand for Truth, the existence of Truth, without any presumption of understanding truth exhaustively, in our personal and private lives, and that inevitably brings the battle to ourselves.

There's no way to have a meaningful discussion in a cesspool without getting the stink on us. Avoiding the cesspool, on the other hand, without consequence invites controversy in this culture the author seems to believe is in a majority.

It's the same "problem" Christian denominations often fail to solve by trying to sale the same hamburger on the other side of the street.

Why would anyone cross the road to check out your wares if you are engaged in offering the same hamburger they can get without crossing the street?