[G Larry]

I’m tired of the charge that I’m over reacting, by suggesting that massive vote fraud was a key in this election.

Way to many data points remain unexplained, in the absense of fraud.

The refusal of some conservatives to vote for Romney is the other half.

[Yashcheritsiy]

Way to many data points remain unexplained, in the absense of fraud.

This, +1000

[willywill]

and the dumbass oreily said last night “president obama won fair and square”..

[Ingtar]

The refusal of some conservatives to vote for Romney is the other half.

I'd love to see the data on this. I haven't even seen anything that breaks down the GOP into the Conservatives and others. It appears to me, at first glance, that it was those overvalued "Independents" who said they were voting for Romney and did not show up.

[HannibalHamlinJr]

Way too many data points remain unexplained, in the absense of fraud. You're making what is an argument constructed along the lines of Obama's whole campaign theme. Think about it - "in absence of me yet understanding the reason, it is therefore fraud."

"There is no other way to explain why my presidency has been a failure, in the absence of George Bush, since I've tried hard. (hence, it was George Bush's fault)

I don't need to go into detail about why the economy tanked in '08 ... both parties share that blame, including both partys' electorates. But there are a number of reasons, uncomfortable to accept, why we lost. Most are more plausible than conspiracy ... and frankly, even if Obama got a 20% advantage due to fraud and won, would still identify that American's can't think.

What if I were to say that in the absence of any proof on this post that you are a human (and I can't prove you are one), you must be a penguin?

Think better and longer .... your point is a fair hypotheses, but it fails logically on identifiable errors, and only provides fodder for the left who would like to show we are black helicopter guys.

[plain talk]

Not sure who is accusing you of overreacting. Any evidence of voter fraud must be reported and pursued. But if dems run these precints how do we get the evidence? I feel like we can look t the numbers from the outside and see they make no sense. But how do we get actual evidence?

[plain talk]

Not sure who is accusing you of overreacting. Any evidence of voter fraud must be reported and pursued. But if dems run these precints how do we get the evidence? I feel like we can look at the numbers from the outside and infer fraud but without access to the data we don’t have prosecutable evidence. I just hope some on our side are pursuing this. I feel like massive fraud occurred because the data I do see makes no sense. However that is not enough.