Replies

Way too many data points remain unexplained, in the absense of fraud. You're making what is an argument constructed along the lines of Obama's whole campaign theme. Think about it - "in absence of me yet understanding the reason, it is therefore fraud."

"There is no other way to explain why my presidency has been a failure, in the absence of George Bush, since I've tried hard. (hence, it was George Bush's fault)

I don't need to go into detail about why the economy tanked in '08 ... both parties share that blame, including both partys' electorates. But there are a number of reasons, uncomfortable to accept, why we lost. Most are more plausible than conspiracy ... and frankly, even if Obama got a 20% advantage due to fraud and won, would still identify that American's can't think.

What if I were to say that in the absence of any proof on this post that you are a human (and I can't prove you are one), you must be a penguin?

Think better and longer .... your point is a fair hypotheses, but it fails logically on identifiable errors, and only provides fodder for the left who would like to show we are black helicopter guys.