Posted on 11/07/2012 9:40:48 PM PST by Kevmo
Wow, not only are you shrill, but now you’re getting... weird. T4BTT, Troll.
If there’s any way do delve into your sick little world of fantasies and manage to avoid “...weird,” - well that would be an amazing trick
Well, look at that. You’re still here. T4BTT, Troll.
I am still here - which is amazing, because it’s what you actually said - yet it isn’t a bold-faced self-serving lie! Proof that there is hope even for the completely clueless.
Now your stuff is going into non-sequitur land, it doesn’t make sense. T4BTT, Troll.
I admit that an element of truth somehow slipped into one of your posts, and you find the idea of truth so foreign that you immediately label it a “non-sequitur” - why is that not surprising in the least???
I admit that an element of truth somehow slipped into one of your posts,
***Whereas, your posts are almost devoid of truth. Because you’re a troll. T4BTT, Troll.
You just keep defining conservatives as those willing to bend a knee to kevmo the great - that will get you places
No, I follow JimRob’s definition of conservatism, from the front page of this website. It excludes trolls like you. T4BTT
Amen!!! About time you learned from your mental superiors and are finally smart enough to follow JimRob’s lead. Of course I did the same prior to the election, but welcome aboard buddy boy, even if you are a little late - nice to have another right-thinking person for the cause.
You’re off into the weeds again, not realizing that JimRob’s definition of conservative excludes FReepers like you as simply trolls.
So I follow JimRob’s lead when it comes to the election, and that makes me a “troll” in your little brain. That’s a new low in stupidity, even for you.
You do NOT follow JimRob’s lead when it comes to leaving those who are more conservative than you alone, as we covered upthread. Like a dog going back to its vomit, that is a new low in stupidity, even for a troll like you.
Oh wait - you also mentioned what was "covered upthread"....funny thing; I just checked upthread, and you are the 'person' who swooped in out of nowhere and decided to start insulting me, though I never said a peep to you. In all the excitement, I'm sure you must have totally forgotten that, because the only other option is you are a lying sack of crap, and certainly that wouldn't be the case with a fine, clever upstanding thing like you. So yes, you're very welcome for getting the benefit of the doubt.
Oh well, you got me fair enough. Can’t argue about “leaving those who are conservative than you alone” Well done.
***Then do it.
It certainly doesn’t start with resisting to respond (note that’s a key word buddy - RESPOND - I never started a discussion with you) to arse-clowns who daydream about making Napoleon’s gun go off in order to take down supporters of Perry, Cain and Gingrich.
Oh wait - you also mentioned what was “covered upthread”....funny thing; I just checked upthread, and you are the ‘person’ who swooped in out of nowhere and decided to start insulting me, though I never said a peep to you.
***Post #138. You said a peep to another freeper, agreeing with his anti-socon views. I posted this thread, so it is not like I “swooped in out of nowhere”. I know you trolls like to consider FR to be your own little playground, but once you post to everyone, you post to... well... everyone. There’s no such thing as not saying a peep to someone else if you posted to everyone.
In all the excitement, I’m sure you must have totally forgotten that,
***Nope. It is you who seem to have forgotten that if you want to say something ONLY to one other freeper, then you freepmail them. When you post, it is to everyone. No such thing as posting to only one other person. Perhaps you never knew this yourself.
because the only other option is you are a lying sack of crap,
***Actually, since you’re not aware of how things work at FR when almost everyone else does, perhaps you are the lying sack of crap. Since you’ve been outed as a troll already, being a lying sack of crap isn’t much of a jump.
and certainly that wouldn’t be the case with a fine, clever upstanding thing like you.
***You’re absolutely correct.
The RNC chooses when and where primaries are held - the penalty for disobedience is removal of delegates to the convention.
THE RNC needs to be replaced and the constituional party might work. The Libertarians are dope smoking isolationists who hate the military.
Since when is it "anti-socon" to vote against Obama - please recall that even JimRob Himself understood this was something that sadly had to be done.
Thank you very, very much for adding good sense to this thread; seriously.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.