Posted on 11/07/2012 9:40:48 PM PST by Kevmo
And of course once you called for the shooting of conservatives who have the complete gall not to march in lockstep with all things kevmo, then you kinda lose the right to talk about anyone "berating" conservatives, buddy boy.
Yes, you compromised your principles.
I voted, as the owner of this site encouraged,
***You can’t think for yourself? Has the owner of this site encouraged the compromisers such as yourself to pound on other freepers who are obviously more conservative than you? So, you think for yourself when it’s conveniently unconservative, is that it?
to stop Obama. That’s the entire point of political principle - to achieve political outcomes.
***How’s that working out for ya? Your POS candidate has managed to get less votes than than McCain. Romney loses to McCain in the primaries in 2008, gee, here’s a great candidate. JimRob has a truthfile for that candidate and consistently calls him a lying, baby-killing, gun-grabbing statist. Brilliant strategy.
Your pretend principles
***If anyone has a pretense to principles, it’s you. You’re pounding conservatives on a conservative site rather than focusing on where the real problem is, the GOP-E. You are a pretend conservative.
did nothing to lead to a good outcome given the options in November.
***Knowing what you now know, that Romney would lose, what would be the best conservative real estate in the country? It would be a conservative website where the owner and the vast majority of followers stuck with their conservative principles. Instead, we got waffling, loss of brand, and faux conservatives like you polluting this website.
JimRob understood the implications of that, shame some here are still too stupid to clue in.
***So then take your cues from JimRob, who isn’t calling those of us who were more conservative than him “stupid”. Anyone who engages in that kind of anticonservative behavior is a troll. You are a troll.
And of course once you called for the shooting of conservatives
***You are wound up pretty tight. Maybe you should add more bran in your diet. The title of this thread is The Republican Civil War. Are you going to key up on anyone else who logged onto such a thread because such a title advocates violence? Or is it possible, just possible for someone as densely unconservative as you, to realize that it is an analogy, and proceeding from such an analogy using the word “like when Napoleon did such & such” is a simple extension of that analogy. But whatever, if it gets under the skin of an unconservative troll such as yourself then maybe it’s worth continuing.
who have the complete gall not to march in lockstep with all things kevmo, then you kinda lose the right to talk about anyone “berating” conservatives, buddy boy.
***Yeah, maybe you should again consider adding that bran to your diet.
Violence against conservatives - that gets the kevmo seal of approval. “Berating” conservatives equates to me responding to you, in a conversation you initiated, since you felt the need by saying hello by calling me a troll - that’s just plain evil. So unless we all fall into lockstep with the brilliant kevmo pretend brand of ‘conservatism’ - we’re all liberal pudknockers. Well, at least you got that consistancy problem of yours fixed....
since you felt the need by saying hello by calling me a troll -
***Hello, Troll and don’t forget Good bye, pudknocker Troll.
Because I’m a troll in your tiny little brain I’m a troll, you advocate the shooting of conservatives. O-kay, may want to have your poor doc check your dosage. I realize now how ludicrous it was for me to expect you to put two thoughts together - it would require you to run out and rent a couple first. Way to forward the cause, brainiac
If there were a (D) after his name, nobody would have questioned it.
Republicans need to stop running Democrats as candidates.
A-freakin-men
Because I’m a troll in your tiny little brain I’m a troll,
***Why, yes you are. Perhaps there is hope for you after all. The first step is to admit you have a problem.
you advocate the shooting of conservatives.
***You logged onto a thread titled “republican civil war” and followed up with that by saying, “like when Napoleon” shot his own troups. If you don’t like the analogy, don’t log onto the thread. Wuss.
O-kay, may want to have your poor doc check your dosage.
***There you go again. Back to berating conservatives on this conservative forum. Troll.
I realize now how ludicrous it was for me to expect you
***What can we expect from YOU? You claim to follow JimRob’s lead but when it comes to dropping the invective against those who are more conservative than you, suddenly you ain’t following his lead. Like a troll.
to put two thoughts together - it would require you to run out and rent a couple first. Way to forward the cause, brainiac
***More berating those who are more conservative than you on this conservative forum. Trolls do that. Conservatives don’t. You Are A Troll.
Correction:
***You logged onto a thread titled “republican civil war” and I followed up with
Have a grown-up teach you what “berating” means. You pop up out of the blue to start ripping into to me - but I’m the one berating. And while anyone who reads your ranting completely understands why a person like you is fascinated with Napoleon’s gun, the fact that you feel the need to whip it out at conservatives makes you pretty far out there, buddy boy. It’s one thing to be a keyboard warrior; quite another when someone reads whom it is you plan to massacre. Get help.
Looks like you’re just suffering from butthurt. Maybe you should reconsider your decision to be a troll. Learn from your pain.
I appreciate your concern for my backside, and would expect as much from a dude fixated on Napoleon’s gun. It’s odd, but at least it shows some type of empathy, which is a far better path than your earlier call for the shooting of conservatives. Baby steps, but steps nonetheless. Keep it up; you can do it buddy!
You’re still at it, I see. Trying hard to say something... uh, worthwhile. Well, at least you try. Thanks for bumping the thread, T4BTT.
I can’t believe even you are a big enough moron to take pleasure that a thread that is nothing more than two boneheads playing post ping-pong is being bumped to the top. Taught me a lesson, though - I won’t underestimate your stupidity again.
Taught me a lesson,
***I have noticed that trolls and anti-conservatives learn from me. But I don’t learn much if anything from you, because you have so little to offer. So go ahead and start focusing on the real problem in conservatism today, the GOP-E. T4BTT
Love your tiny little bizzaro world, where “anti-conservatives” are defined as ‘all those who do not follow the All Mighty kevmo’s babblings in full lockstep,’
Trying to define the opposing side with a straw definition so you can argue against it. Yet another classic fallacy, straw argumentation.
Thanks for bumping the thread. T4BTT.
Those who are not kevmo are cursed with being the other side, no need to define anything. You’re the one who pointed out those not bowing to you need to be worked over with Napoleon’s gun
There you go with that shrill thing again. Time to put more bran in your diet, Troll. Maybe you should think about finding ways to ask whoever the future Napoleon of conservatism will be, to ask him not to fire on you because you’ve been such a good troll up until now. Now that the republican civil war has already started (title of thread), you might be able to save your skin if you crawl back under the rock you came from.
T4BTT, Troll.
I hate to ruin your wet dream, but the little tyrant isn’t going to let idiots who have no ability to recognize the enemy play with his gun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.