Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Matthews And Guest Wonder What’s In Romney’s Head When He Looks Down On ‘Hero’ Obama
Mediaite ^ | October 17, 2012 | Noah Rothman

Posted on 10/18/2012 7:37:47 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews and Inside The Actor’s Studio host James Lipton analyzed the debate performances of both Mitt Romney and President Barack Obama on Wednesday. In the course of their analysis, they verged into a psychological deconstruction of Romney – wondering what he may have been thinking when he “looked down on the president.” Matthews said that it was clear Romney had little regard for Obama “as a person,” but declined to speculate on the reasons for Romney’s disdain beyond the fact that he may not “understand the Constitution.” “I don’t want to get into it, but we can all imagine what that was based upon and none of it good,” said Matthews.

Matthews opened the segment by playing a clip of the moment when Romney asked Obama if he had characterized the September 11 attack in Libya as terrorism on the day after the attack. Rather than respond to the question, Obama replied simply “proceed.”

“It was the face off in High Noon. And the President of the United States was Gary Cooper.” said Lipton. “At that moment, he became a hero, I think” Lipton said that Americans would either chose a president or “a boss” in November. “Job creator is a euphemism for profit creator,” Lipton added, noting that, in his estimation, creating profit often requires downsizing employees in the process.

Matthews then played a clip of the confrontation between Obama and Romney over the GOP nominee’s assertion that permits for energy exploration on federal lands is down over the last four years. As crosstalk between the two candidates died down, Romney spoke over the president attempting to get his point across and told Obama “you’ll get your chance” to respond.

“I don’t think he understands the Constitution of the United States,” said Matthews after watching the exchange. “He’s the President of the United States. You don’t say, ‘you’ll get your chance.’”

“If Mitt Romney were the president and Barack Obama were the challenger, and these roles were reversed, and Obama treated Romney – the president in this construct – the way he was treated, you would have heard an outcry from coast to coast and you would never, ever hear the end of it,” Lipton said, inexplicably. “It is rude. It’s inexcusable. I think it’s a very, very sad day when the presidency, which has been under fire since Nixon — and particular this president — can be treated this way by someone who is an American citizen.”

“I think it’s a lack of deference,” Matthews said in agreement. He said that Romney masked his disregard for Obama in the first debate, “but through it all he looked down at the president.”

“He looked down at him as a person,” said Matthews. Lipton said that he would not go that far, saying that he could not read Romney’s mind. “Is he looking down on the president? I wouldn’t be at all surprised,” Lipton said. “There are reasons for it.”

“Many of them bad,” Matthews concluded.

The pathology of this conversation should be self-evident. When the president becomes iconic – a figure that is deemed by his supporters to be beyond criticism — there is a dangerous dynamic at play.

Watch the segment below via MSNBC:

(VIDEO AT LINK)


TOPICS: Politics; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: chrissymatthews; debate; debates; media; msm; obama; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hero for what?

being born half cracker and half preto?

that is now an accomplishment?

tells a good yarn?

round the firepit?

i mean really


21 posted on 10/18/2012 9:54:43 PM PDT by wardaddy (my wife prays in the tanning bed....guess what region i live in...ya'll?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

“He’s not “The President” during an election debate.”

He’s an employee trying to keep his job doing a presentation to the shareholders.


22 posted on 10/18/2012 10:33:01 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think the Constitution has a provision anticipating just this situation. Challengers to an historically terrible president are required by the Constitution to look down upon him and visualize an empty chair. The founding fathers were prescient, weren’t they?


23 posted on 10/18/2012 11:05:10 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Both men are interviewing for a job.
One wants to be chairman of an obamanation.
The other wants to be president of the
United States of America.

24 posted on 10/19/2012 1:16:20 AM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson