Posted on 08/29/2011 6:23:20 AM PDT by Reaganite Republican
evidence continues to mount that this arrogant, unaccomplished nothing isn't exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer...
On November 16, 1990, Barack Obama, then president of the Harvard Law Review, published a letter in the Harvard Law Record, an independent Harvard Law School newspaper, championing affirmative action. ... The response is classic Obama: patronizing, dishonest, syntactically muddled, and grammatically challenged. In the very first sentence Obama leads with his signature failing, one on full display in his earlier published work: his inability to make subject and predicate agree.
"Since the merits of the Law Review's selection policy has been the subject of commentary for the last three issues," wrote Obama, "I'd like to take the time to clarify exactly how our selection process works."
If Obama were as smart as a fifth-grader, he would know, of course, that "merits ... have." Were there such a thing as a literary Darwin Award, Obama could have won it on this on one sentence alone. He had vindicated Chen in his first ten words.
Although the letter is less than a thousand words long, Obama repeats the subject-predicate error at least two more times. In one sentence, he seemingly cannot make up his mind as to which verb option is correct so he tries both: "Approximately half of this first batch is chosen ... the other half are selected ... "
Another distinctive Obama flaw is to allow a string of words to float in space. Please note the unanchored phrase in italics at the end of this sentence:
"No editors on the Review will ever know whether any given editor was selected on the basis of grades, writing competition, or affirmative action, and no editors who were selected with affirmative action in mind." Huh?
More on celebrated 'author' Obama at American Thinker...
Somehow I screwed up the link, I apologize...
http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/2011/08/hopenchange-church-of-sub-genius.html
Ranks somewhere between “red brick” and “brook trout” on the Scale of Smarts.
If Obama were a GOPer, the MSM would have made him look the the most stupid man to ever live in America, let alone the WH.
You mean the way they treat Herman Cain?
Yep, AND Bachmann of course
Obama isn’t half the man Herman Cain is
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.