Posted on 07/14/2011 10:46:50 AM PDT by jazusamo
Darrell Issa and Charles Grassley demand to know about contact DOJ has had with committee witnesses. Also, a source tells PJM: DOJ has picked a new fall guy to target after they failed to topple ATF Director Ken Melson.
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and Sen. Charles Grassley, (R-IA), ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, have fired off another pair of letters to Attorney General Eric Holder as part of their investigation into the Operation Fast and Furious debacle, which has claimed the lives of at least two American law enforcement agents and a reported 150 Mexican nationals.
In one letter, Issa and Grassley note that the Department of Justice has been providing information about the program to committee witnesses — which implies tampering. The other letter names DOJ officials who knew about the operation.
Per the tampering letter:
We have recently learned that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (BATF) has afforded potential witnesses for the Committees’ investigation into Operation Fast and Furious access to a shared drive on its computer system replete with pertinent investigative documents, including official ATF emails. Although, our staff has been advised the Department has since terminated access to this document cache, we write to seek additional information relating to this egregious decision. We also ask that you promptly self-report this matter to the Office of Inspector General (OIG).
As we understand it, the shared drive contains the documents that have been produced to the Committees through the course of our investigation, those made available for in camera review and possibly documents that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has not yet provided to the Committee. These witnesses had not previously seen many of these documents.
Allowing witnesses access to such documents could taint their testimony by allowing them to tailor their responses to what they think the Committees already know. Additionally, witnesses who gain access to documents they have not previously seen could alter their recollection of events. This practice harms not only our investigation, but also the independent investigation that you instructed the Inspector General to conduct.
In other words: the DOJ was either trying to make sure witness stories are consistent with DOJ talking points, or they were going through the back door to make sure everyone who was testifying was on the same page. Either would likely get the average citizen slapped with an obstruction or witness tampering charge in a state or federal court.
The hypocrisy here is egregious. According to the letter, on May 5 of this year an associate deputy attorney general expressed concern the committee “might allow witnesses exposure to documents they had not previously seen”:
To the extent that you nevertheless plan to interview our trial witnesses prior to trial, we would appreciate you taking the following steps to help reduce the risk of harm to the case that could arise from such interviews. First … we ask that you not show the witnesses new documents, as exposing the witnesses to facts that are not already within their personal knowledge may contaminate their recall of events. Second, for the same reasons, we ask that you not orally convey facts to the witness of which the witness was previously unaware.
DOJ did exactly what they asked Issa’s committee not to do.
Issa and Grassley demanded the following by July 18:
1. Identify which ATF and DOJ employees had access to this shared drive.
2. Provide a log of documents and the date each document was posted to the shared drive.
3. Provide a log of any other documents relating to this investigation, not on the shared drive, to which these employees had access.
4. Provide the dates for which these employees had access to the shared drive.
5. Identify those employees who still have access to this information.
The other letter sent to Holder names the people the committee says it knows for a fact had knowledge about Operation Fast and Furious. Of the 12 names on the list, there are a couple of particular interest. One is Lanny Breuer, former special counsel to President Bill Clinton and current assistant attorney general for the Criminal Division. Another is Deputy Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Blanco.
PJMedia has heard from sources that since DOJ’s attempt to make Acting ATF Director Ken Melson the fall guy failed when he turned King’s Evidence, DOJ is now planning to make Blanco the sacrificial lamb.
A third name of extreme interest: Gary Grindler, Eric Holder’s chief of staff.
It’s a bit difficult to believe that Holder’s chief of staff knew about this operation, but Holder didn’t.
Issa and Grassley are demanding all communications records between the 12 relating to Operation Fast and Furious.
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for Holder to claim — as he has all along – that he didn’t know about the operation until it blew up in his face. Issa and Grassley must keep pounding away until the guilty parties are hauled before a federal grand jury – the country owes Brian Terry and Jamie Zapata nothing less.
ALSO READ:Gunwalker: Smoking Gun Email?
I’d like to feign surprise but I put nothing past these criminals anymore.
Cindie
Exactly! I seriously doubt there’s been a more corrupt Justice Department than the Holder/Obama DOJ in our nations history.
It’s not a sporadic thing with them, it seems to be an everyday occurrence on many different issues and they do it blatantly, defying anyone who may question them.
Man, you’re good.
Another excellent one, Frank. Thanks for posting.
Oh how I hope Holder goes down for this, he’s long overdue.
bump Gunwalker
FYI
5.56mm
Just ask wikileaks for the info. Pretty sure they have it somewhere.
The list, ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
http://www.nachumlist.com/gunrunner.htm
“DOJ did exactly what they asked Issa’s committee not to do.”
Poison pill to the case Issa, and Grassley are working?
That too could be their game. Muddy the waters so any case can’t be prosecuted without debate over who knew what, when. The more confusion, the less chance the perps will end up behind bars.
Why do I think Bill Clinton is advising behind the scenes here?
Finished cocaine is bought by Mexies for $3,000 per key, while unprocessed BASE is just $1,000. How might Mexies TRIPLE their profits with about the same risk? A bit like the oil industry; by moving upstream and also owning the mechanism for processing cocaine base in central America.
Docs related to F&F and Castaway show an interesting confluence of Mexy narco financial interests with Obama political interests:
Mexicans wanted a Honduran operating environment permitting for their own cocaine processing there, further south to the source of the product. This would permit Mexicans to bypass middlemen, collecting the profits these others had enjoyed to that point.
Meanwhile, via arms sales to these dangerous Mexican criminals, Obama would win its own new friends in Central America. As a topper, in the process he would also end up disallowing easy gun sales to law-abiding Americans —call it the Chicago-ization of the whole USA.
So far, this Obama op has killed 152 people, 2 of them badged US officers.
Note that more and more docs uncovered refer to “DEA, ATF **AND OTHER AGENCIES” —so this imbroglio clearly had SECRET FOREIGN POLICY OBJECTIVES.
—>THIS IS IRAN-CONTRA ALL OVER AGAIN<—
Thanks, that scenario would sure explain the Honduran operation “Castaway” thing, hopefully more will be found out about it and reported.
Great post! Bears repeating often.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
