Posted on 04/08/2010 8:58:13 PM PDT by Neoavatara
This all started after Sarah Palin threw the first punch after Obama announced his nuclear arms strategic revision this week:
"It's unbelievable. Unbelievable. No administration in America's history would, I think, ever have considered such a step that we just found out that President Obama is supporting today," Palin, a former Alaska governorand now a Fox News contributor, said Wednesday in an interview with Sean Hannity.
"You know that's kind of like getting out there on the playground a bunch of kids ready to fight and one of the kids saying go ahead, punch me in the face and I'm not going to retaliate. Go ahead and do what you want to with me," she said. "No, it is unacceptable.
(Excerpt) Read more at neoavatara.com ...
Did we just lose a war with Russia?.......................Why are we doing a weapons reduction with Russia?...........
Then WHY bother to address Sarah?
I LOVE SARAH! pure and simple - I have tried to look else where, but she is ON TOP daily!
Love this woman. She is exactly what America needs. Her, or Michelle Bachmann.
He is no expert on ANYTHING and he is the most powerful leader on the planet!!!!!
Of course if FDR and Woodrow Wilson would have been as smart as Odumma, they would have laid down all the weapons we had, so that Japan and Germany would have seen that we want to play nice. What were they thinking?
I am availaible to give him a crash course.
Or anyone
Yes...By electing Obama. Barry is determined to undue everything Reagan achieved....Including WINNING the Cold War.......Obama is destroying the US economy and de-nuking to show the russians how sorry we are for winning......I only hope a Republican controlled congress can put the brakes on Obama’s Madness............
The List, ping
I think there are at least two major differences though. BO’s current chief of staff versus someone Gov. Palin would choose and the fact that if any member of Obama’s staff disagrees with him, he convinces them that he is the one who is correct. Wonder if we will ever really know who really is pulling his strings - and it’s not Rahm.
Someone should ask Obama why if the SecDef and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs were both comfortable with the Surge back in 2006-2007 he felt like he knew more and went around bashing it and predicting failure at every opportunity. How come he didn’t respect the SecDef and the JCS back then?
Besides, when it comes to nukes, comfortable really doens’t cut it with me. I don’t want to just be comfortable. I want to be beyond certain.
All kidding aside, it really is fascinating how the libs and their MSM spinners can't help themselves--Palin seems to be in every news cycle, and their incessant attempts to smear her are bizarre.
I'm not a complete fan of Palin's (which makes me a "hater" around here), but there is one aspect of her that draws my admiration without hesitation--her ability to get libs crazy.
“Palin seems to be in every news cycle, and their incessant attempts to smear her are bizarre.”
No, Palin is their focus now that Bush is no longer President. They alway need someone to focus on and demonize.
Except Palin does not show that it gets to her at all. That drives them nuts.
Gates: Obama strategy report 9 months overdue because law ‘unrealistic’
Naval Institute ^ | April 8, 2010 | USNI
Posted on April 8, 2010 2:58:53 PM EDT by Saint X
ANNAPOLIS, MD - Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said Wednesday that the Obama administration has failed to issue a national security strategy report because the deadline set by Congress “is a completely unrealistic requirement.”
(Excerpt) Read more at usni.org ..
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2489199/posts
Expert on nuclear, not bad for a community organizer. I am somebody!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.