[manc]

I said many of these points yesterday and there was one poster who kept saying guilty due to the affidavit I had to point out that in it there was not any mention of wiretapping at all. There were some who were saying he was an idiot.
Why I asked we have no idea if these charges are trumped up or not so why are we not trusting the media.

what happened yesterday was that it seems sadly there are many ion this country and even on here who will go with a media headline and never question.
It was the same when the raid on the LDS church went ahead
We had some screaming child abuse etc and yet not one abuse charge came to court.

I trust and hope that if I ever have to have a jury then I have those who do not go with the media headlines all the time and I'll take those who can question and think for themselves

[GeronL]

We had some screaming child abuse etc and yet not one abuse charge came to court.

Which doesn't mean there wasn't. Which is another point that could be made about this case I guess.

[Mr Rogers]

Here is my question - what was an FBI agent assigned to the Violent Crime Squad doing investigating ‘phone manipulation’?

Unless he manipulated the phone to bludgeon someone to death, how is it “Violent Crime”?

Smells strongly of set-up!

[Suz in AZ]

I believe you meant to say “FLDS Church” not “LDS Church”.

[CharlesWayneCT]

There are 10 indictments, 3 of which have resulted in convictions, for men in the FLDS compound having sex with minors.

That is a form of “child abuse”, although I know what you meant was that there was no OTHER form of “child abuse”, such as physical abuse or pedophilia.