Posted on 11/26/2009 11:44:18 PM PST by STARWISE
The long process of appealing the ruling of Judge Jerome B. Simandle, who dismissed the case of Kerchner et al. vs. Obama & Congress has begun.
The Federal 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, has set the due date for the filing of briefs of the appellants in the case:
January 4th, 2010.
Commander Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., USNR Retired, issued a public statement regarding the announcement:
We look forward to moving ahead with this very important constitutional case along the legal pathway to the ultimate decision maker for this historic and precedence setting lawsuit, the U.S. Supreme Court. They will determine the answer to the pressing legal question of what is a natural born Citizen of the USA per Article II constitutional standards and did Obama and the U.S. Congress violate the Constitution and statutory laws and my constitutional rights during the 2008 election cycle.
And, the Supreme Court will also be asked to refer their legal definition to Congress to determine if Obama meets that legal ruled definition. I say Obama does not meet the founders and framers intent for the Article II eligibility clause.
I say Obama is a deceiver and a usurper.
Commander Kerchner, in his zeal for the Constitution and public education on its provisions, is also continuing his public campaign to educate the American public on this issue. He closes his public news release with the following notice:
In the interim in addition to our internet efforts, we are running educational advertorials in print media to inform the general public of the issues. See an example attached.
More examples can be seen at:
http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/advertorials.htm
Briefs Due By January 4th, 2010 ............ PING!
http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/advertorials.htm
Sorry, too much turkey ...
Here’s the link to the article:
BTTT !
Is this the Berg case?
No .. Mario Apuzzo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Kerchner v Obama & Congress - 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals Briefing Notice Issued
Kerchner v Obama & Congress - 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals Briefing Notice Issued
24 Nov 2009: BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Appellant Darrell James Lenormand, Appellant Donald H. Nelsen Jr. and Appellant Lowell T. Patterson due on or before 01/04/2010. Appendix due on or before 01/04/2010. (TMK)
Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., CDR USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/kerchner-v-obama-congress-3rd-circuit.html
Just like the Global Warming Scam was exposed, so to, this will be exposed, and soon.
Justice delayed...
This scandal needs to be aired before KSM trial diverts media attention.
What do these ladies have to do with the situation?
Oh you mean dikes like this one?
Gotta laugh, or I'd scream.
This is an interesting lawsuit in that it names former Vice President Dick Cheney as a defendant along with Obama and Pelosi.
KERCHNER et al v. OBAMA et al
Plaintiffs: CHARLES F. KERCHNER, JR., LOWELL T. PATTERSON, DARRELL JAMES LENORMAND and DONALD H. NELSEN, JR.
Defendants: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, UNITED STATES SENATE, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, RICHARD B. CHENEY and NANCY PELOSI
Case Number: 1:2009cv00253
Filed: January 20, 2009
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office [ Court Info ]
County: Burlington
Presiding Judge: Judge Jerome B. Simandle
Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Other Statutory Actions
Cause: U.S. Government Defendant
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question
Well, at the time the Senate accepted the results of the Electoral College vote, Cheney was the VP and President of the Senate. He failed to ask if anyone had any sort of objection to accepting those results. Had he so asked, someone could have responded and we might not be where we are now.
I suppose he could claim he had no idea Obama was anything other than what he claimed but I’d find that hard to believe.
“Well, at the time the Senate accepted the results of the Electoral College vote, Cheney was the VP and President of the Senate. He failed to ask if anyone had any sort of objection to accepting those results. Had he so asked, someone could have responded and we might not be where we are now.”
Okay, maybe he’s a pure as the driven snow... or maybe not! Actually, I doubt we ever know. Politicians being what they are, he may have been coluding with Obama or Soros or Satan himself, though I repeat myself... repeatedly.
he may have been coluding with Obama or Soros or Satan himself
~~~~~~~~~
Please, remove the tinfoil.
Hey! It’s my head and my tinfoil. I’ll wear whatever I want, whenever I want! So there! Nyah! Nyah! Nyah!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.