Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain-Feingold On the Ropes?
NetRight Nation ^ | September 24, 2009 | Michael Swartz

Posted on 09/24/2009 12:20:19 PM PDT by NetRight Nation

If you ask Americans about campaign finance reform, most likely they’ll answer something about the need for it because “there’s too much money in politics,” not realizing that to many the freedom to donate to the political candidate of their choice is a right equated with everything else granted by the First Amendment. It’s quite possible those free speech advocates will soon be pleased as a key part of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform package may be overturned by the Supreme Court.

In what began as a quite innocent case brought out as a clarification request by the producers of “Hillary: The Movie” asking whether they were bound by McCain-Feingold’s 60-day pre-election prohibition on independent groups airing campaign ads and other campaign financing laws in buying commercial time to advertise their documentary, the argument was widened by the Supreme Court into a much more broad discussion on whether the century-old ban on direct corporate and labor union electoral donations should be lifted.

A clear sign of their possible intent came in questioning by Chief Justice John Roberts, who compared the government’s interference in campaign finance as akin to “Big Brother” and dismissed the federal government’s argument by Solicitor General Elena Kagan, noting sharply that the power to enforce the First Amendment doesn’t belong in the hands of Federal Elections Commission bureaucrats.

(Excerpt) Read more at netrightnation.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: campaigns; mccain; money; politics

1 posted on 09/24/2009 12:20:20 PM PDT by NetRight Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NetRight Nation
Reform would be to


2 posted on 09/24/2009 12:29:07 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (There is no "O" in Transparency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetRight Nation

McCain-Feingold-Thompson deserves to dumped on the ash heap of history.


3 posted on 09/24/2009 12:38:54 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetRight Nation
It’s quite possible those free speech advocates will soon be pleased as a key part of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform package may be overturned by the Supreme Court.

Part of it? The smart money is on the REST of it getting tossed, probably within about two weeks from today.

4 posted on 09/24/2009 12:59:53 PM PDT by xjcsa (And these three remain: change, hope and government. But the greatest of these is government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
McCain-Feingold-Thompson deserves to dumped on the ash heap of history.

Agreed.

PS: Are you running, Pissant?

5 posted on 09/24/2009 1:10:06 PM PDT by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB

Mostly walking, since I tweaked my knee


6 posted on 09/24/2009 1:11:06 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NetRight Nation

Don’t have O’Conner on the court to screw it up this time.


7 posted on 09/24/2009 1:18:57 PM PDT by Nateman (If liberals aren't screaming you're doing it wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

After reading some of your earlier posts, I’m convinced that you’re the type of politician we need. I hope you’ll consider it.


8 posted on 09/24/2009 1:27:06 PM PDT by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB

LOL. There would be women coming out of the woodwork to assure I wouldn’t get close to even a primary victory.


9 posted on 09/24/2009 1:29:00 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pissant
LOL. There would be women coming out of the woodwork to assure I wouldn’t get close to even a primary victory.

That's the country's loss.

I'm not a world class expert on women, but I've strived to always part on good terms. I believe I'd be welcomed back by most, if not all that I've loved.

If your name was Clinton, it would be a career enhancement.

10 posted on 09/25/2009 5:57:55 AM PDT by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson