Skip to comments.
al-Qaeda Claims to Have Nukes !!
Jamestown.org/Yidwithlid ^
| 2/18/09
| Yidwithlid
Posted on 02/18/2009 5:45:59 PM PST by Shellybenoit
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: Shellybenoit
If something like this ever happens, the middle east by and large had better be a pot marked sheet of glass and I would not want to hold mosque property anywhere in the country.
2
posted on
02/18/2009 5:48:53 PM PST
by
DonaldC
To: DonaldC
Personally, I think a dirty nuke is more their style.
3
posted on
02/18/2009 5:49:53 PM PST
by
DonaldC
To: Shellybenoit
Couldn’t read the whole blog. I don’t even want to know anymore. It’s not like we can do anything to stop this, not with Bambi running the world.
4
posted on
02/18/2009 5:51:19 PM PST
by
Soothesayer
(The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
To: Shellybenoit
Hope they don’t blow up DC during the next State of the Union address.....
5
posted on
02/18/2009 5:51:27 PM PST
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
To: Shellybenoit
don’t worry if they kill 10 million Americans they will have a subpoena issued and could face a trial!
6
posted on
02/18/2009 5:51:35 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Hey, won't you be my Face Book friend??)
To: Shellybenoit
al-Qaeda Claims to Have Nukes !! Doesn't matter. They'd never use nukes against the U.S. now that Obama is President. Won't happen. Impossible.
To: DonaldC
O will blame our own racism and crack down against conservatives
8
posted on
02/18/2009 5:52:37 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Hey, won't you be my Face Book friend??)
To: Shellybenoit
Frankly, if NYC gets hit again its there own fault. They were the first ones to bash Bush for doing exactly what they wanted. Remember the Jersey Broads?
Pray for America and Our Troops
9
posted on
02/18/2009 5:55:00 PM PST
by
bray
(The District of Corruption fits Obama like a Glove)
To: DonaldC
Agreed.
A nuclear bomb is a pretty sophisticated piece of equipment. It the acquire one they have to use it due to degradation issues. Or, they have to have techs to maintain it. It doesn’t even work well as a threat because they can’t hold it over any one’s head for very long.
They would have to put up or shut up and they’re still jabberin.
10
posted on
02/18/2009 5:55:02 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: Shellybenoit
Obama's going to ship them all the resources they need to deliver them.
'Sanctions? What were they for? Give 'em what they want. As long they think I'm cool...'
11
posted on
02/18/2009 5:55:30 PM PST
by
allmost
To: Shellybenoit
Former Clinton Secretary of Defense William Perry and former Assistant Secretary of Defense Graham Allison believe that the nuclear destruction of one or more American cities is more probable than not in the very near future. Barrack will save us!.
He'll talk them to death. Or maybe talk them even crazier than they are now.
He's certainly doing that to me.
12
posted on
02/18/2009 5:57:11 PM PST
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: Shellybenoit
We keep hearing politicians talk about the retribution that Iran would receive should there be a nuclear attack on Israel or the USThese are the same savage ratbastards who sent their own children on a walk through Iraqi minefields, with litle plastic "keys to heaven" to comfort them as they prceeded to get themselves blown apart.
What kind of "deterrence" could these disease entities possibly care about?
To: Shellybenoit
I will believe Al Quaeda has nukes when I see the firt explosion in Israel
If they had them they would have already used them.
Insanity runs deep.
15
posted on
02/18/2009 6:04:38 PM PST
by
Venturer
To: Venturer
http://www.debka.com/index1.php
Barack Obama concludes secret pact with Saudi King
DEBKA-Net-Weekly Exclusive Report
February 18, 2009, 2:12 PM (GMT+02:00)
DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s reveals the terms of the accord US president Barack Obama has secretly forged with Saudi King Abdullah and the ways in which they plan to work together in the Muslim world, the Persian Gulf and the Middle East.
Moscow in contrast is deepening its ties with Tehran.
The implications of this widening divergence are examined in the coming issue of DEBKA-Net-Weekly out Friday.
16
posted on
02/18/2009 6:06:28 PM PST
by
sheikdetailfeather
(I will never stop listening to Rush Limbaugh.)
To: Shellybenoit
He wants to execute it in a way that kills up to 10,000,000 Americans. Piker. Obama's good friend Bill Ayers wanted to kill 25 million, and that was years ago.
17
posted on
02/18/2009 6:07:54 PM PST
by
Interesting Times
(For the truth about "swift boating" see ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
To: Shellybenoit
Our new government doesn't really understand the threat. We keep hearing politicians talk about the retribution that Iran would receive should there be a nuclear attack on Israel or the US. What they don't get is mutually assured destruction is not a threat to people who strap bombs onto their children's backs so they can blow themselves up.
![](http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/01/10/world/11iran_1_lg.jpg) Inspecting the centrifuges |
18
posted on
02/18/2009 6:14:42 PM PST
by
cynwoody
To: Squantos
Right, definitely hope not.
19
posted on
02/18/2009 6:17:15 PM PST
by
Ahithophel
(Padron@Anniversario)
To: DonaldC
From everything I've read, nuke weapons are very difficult to maintain in a ready state. Not something armatures can do.
I'll bet this is just braggadocio.
20
posted on
02/18/2009 6:18:33 PM PST
by
FBD
(My carbon footprint is bigger then yours)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson