Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Campaign Defends Planted Questions
AZCONSERVATIVE ^ | 17 Nov 2007 | John Semmens

Posted on 11/18/2007 9:32:46 AM PST by John Semmens

Democratic presidential frontrunner Senator Hillary Clinton’s campaign was forced to admit that it has been planting questions at her public appearances. Clinton campaign spokesman Mo Elliethee admitted that the campaign has been regularly planting questions, but defended the practice.

“Let’s face it, too few of the people at these events are smart enough to formulate a coherent question,” Elliethee claimed. “The Democratic Party’s constituency is over-weighted toward the ill-informed and under-educated. If they could hack it they wouldn’t need the government programs the candidates are devising to help them.”

To bolster his argument, Elliethee recounted the time in 1992 when a questioner asked then presidential candidate Bill Clinton whether he preferred “briefs or boxers.” “If we leave the questions up to the average person we’re taking a big chance,” Elliethee warned. “I mean, what’s Senator Clinton going to do when some goofball asks her whether she prefers ‘guys or gals?’”

In related news, both openly-gay members of Congress have endorsed Hillary Clinton for president. Representative Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), the only acknowledged lesbian in the House, endorsed Clinton months ago. This week Representative Barney Frank (D-Mass.), the only admitted homosexual man currently serving in congress, came out for Clinton. “Senator Clinton has always been a staunch advocate for homosexual rights,” Frank said. “She understands our needs like she was one of us.”

(Excerpt) Read more at azconservative.org ...


TOPICS: Humor; Politics
KEYWORDS: democrats; gays; hillary; satire

1 posted on 11/18/2007 9:32:46 AM PST by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Oh, if only such an honest story were true... ;)


2 posted on 11/18/2007 9:34:57 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

““Let’s face it, too few of the people at these events are smart enough to formulate a coherent question,” Elliethee claimed. “The Democratic Party’s constituency is over-weighted toward the ill-informed and under-educated. If they could hack it they wouldn’t need the government programs the candidates are devising to help them.”

Ain’t it the truth and they got this right.

Is this from The Onion or Scrappleface? The Dhims would never admit to this or any other fault about their minidless, lockstep sycophants.


3 posted on 11/18/2007 9:37:21 AM PST by garyhope (It's World War IV, right here, right now, courtesy of Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

“Let’s face it, too few of the people at these events are smart enough to formulate a coherent question,”
Elliethee claimed.
“The Democratic Party’s constituency is over-weighted toward the ill-informed and under-educated.
If they could hack it they wouldn’t need the government programs the candidates are devising to help them.”

LOL


4 posted on 11/18/2007 9:37:55 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garyhope

The only important difference between Nazi-ism, Fascism, Communism, Socialism and Liberalism is the spelling, and that the last group hasn’t got the brains to figure it out.
- Bill Vance


5 posted on 11/18/2007 9:40:03 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
“I mean, what’s Senator Clinton going to do when some goofball asks her whether she prefers ‘guys or gals?’”

Heh, heh. Or, whether she prefers guys who used to be gals or gals who used to be guys.

6 posted on 11/18/2007 10:33:04 AM PST by Texas Eagle (Could pacifists exist if there weren't people brave enough to go to war for their right to exist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Oh, if only such an honest story were true... ;)

It's all true except for the part about them admitting it...
7 posted on 11/18/2007 1:39:46 PM PST by tje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
“Let’s face it, too few of the people at these events are smart enough to formulate a coherent question,” Elliethee claimed.

Let's face it ... this is what the Democrats and the Democratic Party believe of the American citizen and voter! An opinion closely akin to what the King thought of his subjects, be they in England or in the Colonies. The colonists finally had enough of him.

I'm wondering when the American people will see the light regarding the Democrats.
8 posted on 11/18/2007 8:27:16 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson