Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Right-Wing Assault on the New York Times (Rev. Communist Party defends NYT)
Revolution #53 ^ | July 16, 2006

Posted on 07/14/2006 6:52:59 AM PDT by pravknight

he Right-Wing Assault on the New York Times

A major, very serious, and significant right-wing assault has been unleashed against the New York Times, a key pillar of the liberal imperialist establishment, and a frequent critic of Bush Administration policies.

This fascistic firestorm was unleashed after the Times published, against the Bush Administration’s wishes, a June 22 story revealing a secret government program, nicknamed Swift, which gave U.S. officials “access to financial records from a vast international database and examined banking transactions involving thousands of Americans and others in the United States.” According to the Times, the Bush administration claimed that the program was limited to “tracing transactions of people suspected of ties to Al Qaeda,” the same claim it made before it was revealed the Bush regime was monitoring tens of millions of U.S. phone calls. As the Times also pointed out, this program, like other Bush spying programs, “doesn’t seem to have any specific Congressional approval or formal authorization.”

President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Republican officials and a whole slew of right-wing pundits have singled out the NY Times for criticism.

Kentucky Senator Jim Bunning called for a treason investigation against The Times. Rightwing radio host Glenn Beck claimed the Times was "fighting for the same thing that al-Qaida wants." Rush Limbaugh proclaimed the Times was "trying to help the jihadists." Newt Gingrich said of the paper, "They hate George W. Bush so much that they would be prepared to cripple America in order to go after the president."

On June 30, the Wall Street Journal editorialized, “On issue after issue, it has become clear that the Times believes the U.S. is not really at war, and in any case the Bush Administration lacks the legitimacy to wage it.” NY Times columnist Frank Rich (“All the News That’s Fit to Bully,” July 9, 2006) reported that California radio talk-show host Melanie Morgan said the Times was guilty of treason and called for its editor, Bill Keller, to be sent to the gas chamber.

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman considers this right-wing assault part and parcel of the Bush regime’s drive to crush any and all opposition and create and “authoritarian” state. In “The Treason Card” (July 7, 2006), Krugman wrote:

“Over the last few months a series of revelations have confirmed what should have been obvious a long time ago: the Bush administration and the movement it leads have been engaged in an authoritarian project, an effort to remove all the checks and balances that have heretofore constrained the executive branch.

“Much of this project involves the assertion of unprecedented executive authority—the right to imprison people indefinitely without charges (and torture them if the administration feels like it), the right to wiretap American citizens without court authorization, the right to declare, when signing laws passed by Congress, that the laws don’t really mean what they say.

“But an almost equally important aspect of the project has been the attempt to create a political environment in which nobody dares to criticize the administration or reveal inconvenient facts about its actions. And that attempt has relied, from the beginning, on ascribing treasonous motives to those who refuse to toe the line.”

Krugman notes that the attack on the Times “seems to have startled many people in the news media,” and that “somehow, nobody seems to find calls to send Bill Keller to the gas chamber funny.” He notes growing public anger and distrust of Bush and company, and hopes that “while the White House clearly believes that attacking The Times is a winning political move, it doesn’t have to turn out that way—not if enough people realize what’s at stake.”

Indeed, people should realize the seriousness of what is taking place. As the World Can’t Wait call states: “The Bush regime is setting out to radically remake society very quickly, in a fascist way, and for generations to come.”

We must act now. The future is in the balance.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: communist; liberalism; liberalmedia; marxist; newyorktimes; nyglbttimes; nyt; revolutionary
It seems the New York Times isn't just the Dems' favorite paper. The Maoists love it too.
1 posted on 07/14/2006 6:53:02 AM PDT by pravknight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pravknight

Gus Hall still subscribes.


2 posted on 07/14/2006 6:55:56 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pravknight
Over the last few months a series of revelations have confirmed what should have been obvious a long time ago: the Bush administration and the movement it leads have been engaged in an authoritarian project, an effort to remove all the checks and balances that have heretofore constrained the executive branch.

Is releasing classified information and helping the enemy in a time of war, a "check" or a "balance"?

3 posted on 07/14/2006 6:57:41 AM PDT by GOPJ (Conservative publishers are letting the monkeys to run the zoo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pravknight
"liberal imperialist establishment"

I'm really gonna' get kind of misty eyed the day we pack all the commies into a rocket and shoot them into the sun.

In between bouts of slaughtering millions of people they sometimes say some of the funniest and entertaining things.

4 posted on 07/14/2006 6:58:53 AM PDT by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pravknight

"We must act now. The future is in the balance."

At least ONE thing he said was true.

WE must act to discredit this vicious leftwing propaganda machine while its on the ropes.

We may never be able to totally destroy leftist organs like the Times, CNN, etc. but, thanks to the Internet and some stations like FOX, we can present our viewpoint undiluted and make an impression on the moral eunuchs who occupy higher office, and in the process, dilute the impact of these propaganda organs.


5 posted on 07/14/2006 6:59:12 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pravknight

As I read it I see this is just a plug for Krugman's book.


6 posted on 07/14/2006 6:59:44 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pravknight
Hey, look, these Commies gotta' learn to understand that all we want to do is frogmarch all the traitors out of the NYT building and hang them for treason ~ after a trial of course.

Nothin' personal in it, and just because we don't worry about the Commies anymore doesn't mean we've forgotten them in this.

They should simply avoid eyecontact with us and back up slowly and all will be well.

We promise, right?.

7 posted on 07/14/2006 7:00:54 AM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pravknight
We must crush any who dare to question the Truth that is the Times. We must act now to prevent anyone from actually daring to scrutinize the few remaining conduits of Truth into the American capitalist quagmire the Fascists are trying to create.

If we allow dissent in re the Times then who knows what conduits of Truth may fall next- the public school system? Network television? History departments at universities?

I love it!

8 posted on 07/14/2006 7:01:09 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
As I read it I see this is just a plug for Krugman's book.

Maybe Krugman can sue Dick Chaney & Karl Rove and then he could join CIA analyst Valeria Plame & parasite hubby Joe Wilson on a nationwide book promotion including interviews on all Big Media outlets.

9 posted on 07/14/2006 7:06:29 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pravknight

"It seems the New York Times isn't just the Dems' favorite paper. The Maoists love it too." ~ pravknight

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1664952/posts?page=40#40


10 posted on 07/14/2006 7:10:33 AM PDT by Matchett-PI ( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pravknight
That communists would support the York Times is not surprising. That the NYT supports Democrats is also not surprising.

A close reading of the Democrat Political Platform and the Communist Manifesto reveals that both follow the same ideology.

It's not the "Left" who have captured the Democrat party, it is the communists.

Under communist control the Democrats have made it clear that they are against: individual responsibility; free-enterprise capitalism; private property; the Judeo/Christian American tradition; national sovereignty; and GOD. Where am I wrong? Anyone?
11 posted on 07/14/2006 7:18:02 AM PDT by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R.W.Ratikal
Teddy Kennedy on individualism:


"Since September 11, the courageous
acts of countless Americans have set
a new standard for the nation. Indeed,
a new American spirit has been forged.
That spirit is characterized by sacrifice,
humility, and a refusal to quit
in the face of adversity. At a time
when our entire country is banding
together and facing down individualism,
the Patriots set a wonderful
example, showing us all what is possible
when we work together, believe
in each other, and sacrifice for the
common good..."

Yah, you are correct!
12 posted on 07/14/2006 7:24:59 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: R.W.Ratikal

Agreed. More relevantly, compare the Democratic platform with those of the minor Communist parties, such as the CPUSA, Workers World Party, Socialist Workers Party, Democratic Socialists of America, etc.

They all back the same issues. Non-communists in the Democratic Party are an endangered species.


13 posted on 07/14/2006 8:16:02 AM PDT by pravknight (Liberalism under the guise of magisterial teaching is still heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pravknight

SeeBS is jumping in too...

www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/14/opinion/main1805877.shtml


14 posted on 07/15/2006 7:47:35 AM PDT by GOPJ (Conservative publishers are letting the monkeys to run the zoo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson