Posted on 11/12/2004 1:20:27 PM PST by PJ-Comix
A little hint for those of you attempting to infiltrate DummieLand---Don’t post threads over there praising Hillary. It is a sure giveaway that you are really a Freeper. The fact is most DUmmies DON’T like Hillary either as a person or as an electible candidate. They will be VERY SUSPICIOUS of anybody posting threads favorable to Hillary. Oh, a little sidenote here. I often go to flea markets looking for books. Many, many bestsellers there such as by Stephen King or Tom Clancey. All the bestselling books eventually make their way through the recycling circles to the flea markets. But guess what? What is supposedly one of the best selling books of all times---“Lying History” by Hillary---is RARELY seen at the flea markets. In fact I saw only ONE copy of this book the other day and it is was in MINT CONDITION (never read). So if Hillary’s book was such a MASSIVE best seller why doesn’t it appear at the flea markets? Perhaps they are still sitting in those warehouses where her labor union pals dumped them after making their Hillary contributions via the book route. Just food for thought here. Anyway, sit back, relax, and laugh at this DUmmie THREAD entitled, “Does anyone else think Hillary would be a disastrous nominee in 2008?”. As usual the DUmmie rantings are in Bolshevik Red while the observations of your humble correspondent are in the [brackets]:
Does anyone else think Hillary would be a disastrous nominee in 2008?
[Yes, so PLEASE nominate her.]
Folks, I like Hillary. But for whatever reason, she is (unfairly) hated, loathed, and despised by a not insignificant segment of the population who will stop at nothing to defeat her.
[Replace the “unfairly” with “fairly” and your statement is close to reaching coherence.]
In other words, she's got too much baggage. She's toxic. The last thing we need in 2008 is to dredge up all the old hatreds and rivalries of the Clinton era. We need a fresh start--a new leader who can talk to the country with a clean slate.
[John Kerry?]
yeah, she would get creamed in the same states as Kerry but of course the primary system works well for those that appeal to the base, not the general, so Hillary would be tough to beat. But the meme for picking Kerry was "because he has the best chance of beating Bush", so perhaps we can be pragmatic as a party out of power and pick someone like Bayh or Warner.
[Too bad Bayh doesn’t pass the abortion litmus test. He voted to ban partial birth abortions thus taking him out of the running as Democrat Presidential nominee.]
I agree Hillary will engergize the repukes like not other candidate. We would get creamed. She doesn't have her husbands charisma to defend herself. Lets keep her where she is.
[No. Let’s nominate her. I like to see you creamed.]
I think she, justified or not, represents an old face of the Democratic Party that needs to be removed. If I remember correctly, she was booed at that televised convention for victims of Sept. 11? I also think she's in it for the power and control. In my mind, if she was worth her salt, she would have ditched Bill when the Monica scandal broke. She didn't, so I figure she only stayed because she wanted to be near power. People who simply want power for power's sake are not to be trusted.
[Hmmm….I won’t give you away but you are revealing too many tells of a Freeper infiltrator in Dummieland. Please develop a more convincing Dummie alter ego technique. But then, we can’t all be professionals like your Humble Correspondent.]
I think she would be a great Pres. but the mere sight of her throws the other side into a fury. We need to put her on the back burner until we take back solid control of this country.
[By that time, Hillary would be a mummy.]
she's not tough enough, appeases too much screw hilary
[At least we know Bill hasn’t, mopaul.]
I can't stand her....but she is tough enough. But please democrats, don't give the repubs their wet dream....enough with the Hillary talk.
[It’s tough to think of Hillary giving anybody a wet dream.]
Now it is suddenly clear to me, after the Bush "mandate," just how badly we would lose if we ran Hillary. We need a tough, plain-spoken populaist, prefarbly Southern, and preferably a potential "beer buddy."
[Sorry, but Billy Carter is NOT available.]
Yes I do. I really do not like her. I like her as a Senator, but she has been poisoned by the DLC and the DNC as they now stand. Out with the old guard, in with some fresh, new faces.
[Chelsea?]
She would not win a single red state.
[And probably even fewer Blue States.]
FAUX "news" is SO aggressively pushing her to run in 2008. PLEASE don't fall into this trap. Hillary would lose and lose BIG. 75% of the people in this country cringe at the name "Clinton". She's damaged goods. Facts suck, but it's still an old white boys club. I want to WIN, not set a precedent and alienate.
[I absolute disagree with your statement. 95% of the people in this country cringe at her name.]
She botched healthcare so bad that it fell out of public discourse for a decade. Her gaffe-filled carpetbagger campaign in New York netted her a slimmer margin over Rick Partyhack than Gore had over Bush in the state. Her Senate record has no standout acheivements that I know of.
[On the upside she does have the biggest Senate office of any of her fellow Democrats.]
Now that I know that she supports outsourcing, I think she's even worse, and heck, I don't blame Bill for straying from the nest.
[I don’t blame him for straying from the Hillary nest either but couldn’t the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES done just a wee bit better than Monica?]
She'd get McGoverned. Does the party really want to nominate another elitist, northeast liberal senator?
[GO FOR IT!!!]
Hillary would be worse than Kerry. She's Kerry in a dress, and the RW would hate her more because she's a woman. It would insult their "manhood".
[Kerry in drag. Now that’s an interesting thought. I bet Edwards would love that sight.]
All of this talk about running Hillary Clinton in 2008. The RNC has been ready to destroy her since 1994. The strategy that took the House and Senate away from Clinton was designed and largely financed by me.
[A DUmmie designed and financed the Republican strategy of winning the House and Senate in 1994? Is that Peyote you’re smoking or just straight crack?]
I think Clarkies are fabulous. I just do not trust Clark.
[LOL!]
Yes. I will not support, no matter what, even if I get kicked off DU. Worst mistake ever. She does not have the trust of the anti war people and the right wing would kill us all before the let her be elected. I voted for her for here in NY and after her war vote I decided to never again support her.
[But to give Hillary her credit, she is an EXCELLENT investor in cattle futures. You think you could turn a $1000 investment into $100,000 in just a year in that market, hotshot?]
I love her to bits, but living amidst freepers, i can tell you right now, we might as well run al sharpton. she's the punchline to most of their lame jokes.
[Al Sharpton in ’08? Hmmm…. I LIKE that idea!]
I would rather see Boxer/Lewis.. John Lewis would electrify the campaign, and he deserves a bigger stage than congressman from Georgia.
[Give me a chance to take a few hits off the crack pipe. I’ll need it to even consider this a feasible ticket.]
Absolute worst choice, Christ, I'd vote for Sharpton before her.
[WHOA! Am I seeing a big groundswell for Sharpton here?]
I respect and even like her, but she's waaaay to far to the right. And then there's the bitter hatred so many have for her. Forget her. I say Obama!!!!
[Forget her. I say Fidel!!!!]
If she gets the nomination, I will invest absolutely nothing of myself in that election. She will get my vote and that's it. Look foreward to a Repuke landslide.
[HILLARY! HILLARY! HILLARY!]
I saw her on Letterman several months ago and he was asking her about the War on Terra and I couldn't detect the first whiff of dissent. On top of that, I absolutely hated the glib, passionless way she answered his questions.
[Glib and passionless. Sort of like her “Lying History” book.]
she is an extermely polarizing figure. She would probably NEVER win nationally. If you thought the smear campaign the republicans waged against John Kerry was bad, just wait until Hillary runs. I shudder to think what they have in store for Hillary.
[Her track record.]
She is a terrible speaker. When she projects her voice she gets shrill. She would be a disaster on the stump.
[Um…you know…I just think…you know…that your…you know…assertion just might be…you know….an exaggeration.]
She too easily falls into the stereotype of the "shrill, powerhungry feminist". Plus all of the Clinton baggage. Plus I don't think she has core beliefs. Our candidate must have core beliefs, integrity and political courage this time around; Hillary has none of those. People have a visceral dislike of Hillary the same way they do Martha Stewart. Of course there's some sexism involved, but it has much more to do with the perception that she's an elitist who looks down on the "little people".
[Martha Stewart! Now there is a woman to seriously consider for the ’08 ticket. Sort of like Hillary but not nearly as repulsive.]
You're not going to see a Northeastern Democrat run successfully in 2008, be it Hillary or Dean or Jesus H. Christ.
[I’ve always wondered…Does the “H” in Jesus H. Christ stand for Hillary?]
a Hillary candidacy would be a poison pill. If it looks bleak now, that might be the death knell for the left ever electing a president.
[Take two poison pills and go to sleep…..permanently. ]
If we like getting our ass kicked...then pick Hilary. But who in the hell else can we pick?
[Janet Reno?]
Common sense says that she's a losing bet...BUT I can't help but feel that she is being "ordained" for the Presidency by forces beyond our ordinary control.
[I believe they are called Satanic forces.]
Unless BBV is fixed, no Democratic nominee stands a chance.
[The settings on the Diebold machines are already fixed to go 2 to 1 against her in ’08.]
Maybe Chelsea some day, but not Hillary.
[First we need to wean Chelsea away from beer and then she needs to actually SAY something in public. Chelsea 2020?]
Welcome #262 on the PING List.
Please add me to your DU ping list!
His record running Indiana as Governor will should stop him. I seriously doubt he would get the Dim nomination. He's too conservative.
They were giving them away at a book club, too. If you bought so many books, they gave you Hillarys book free. I wouldn't take one even free. but I figure somebody bought up a bunch of them and needed to get rid of them.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2684114
Another GREAT DUmmy FUnny.
WHY OH WHY DO THEY LIKE BUSH!?
HE's SATAN!
;-)
Our attorneys will be contacting you immediately. You must stop posting these private thoughts of our progressive thinkers now. You will regret any attempts to turn these posts into a comic book.
Skinner_DU
I went to DU today on a whim, and found some comments
where the DU crowd is afraid to run Hillary because
"freepers hate her."
Interesting perspective... Let's keep it up, MAYBE
Hillary the Candidate will just fade away....
More info on the DU
"slamming" Hillary.
Could it be they really are concerned about her???
Hillary Rodham is a Radical but can she really hide her identity to win an election??
Looks like she'll have to.
Hillary wants to run.
Hillary wants to WIN.
Good topic, but NO WAY should we
be encouraging Hillary Clinton to run!
She is a wicked, evil person.
She hates America and would be
underhanded enough to win.
I would NEVER risk the future of our
country on her candidancy!
On election night, I almost got sick
thinking of the possibiliy of Kerry winning,
imagine the horror of an election night
with Hillary (and Bill) Clinton on the Ballot!
I would never laugh at her as a candidate.
That's like tempting the devil.
>>From DU comments..
" All of this talk about running Hillary Clinton in 2008. The RNC has been ready to destroy her since 1994. "<<
Thank Goodness Judicial Watch is still out there
to STOP Hillary.
http://www.judicialwatch.org
It ain't over yet.
Hey, Skinner (if that is really you), I notice there are Freeper threads posted on the DU that are "ridiculed" also. Can't take the heat?
"You must stop posting these private thoughts of our progressive thinkers now."
===
LMFAO!
I never did finish that book....
Clean up your own house, Skinner, before you come to ours. Half of your sick little site is Freeper quotes!
Typical leftist hypocrite.
"I never did finish that book...."
Probably the most over-rated book of the last 20 years, at least in terms of best-sellers. My very lib. friend had never read it either and she asked my why I didn't like it, I said it was very pretentious and contrived and she said "That's what I thought, good I won't bother with it now."
So, we see there IS some common ground. Or was, that was a couple of years ago.
Skinner, go jump!
Your boys violate copyright all the time by posting stuff from FR and linking to us!
Physician, heal thyself!
Idiot!
"Progressive" thinking?
You MUST be kidding...all your thinking is strictly regressive. You'd sooner see this nation back in the stone age.
If you don not like our resident humourist, call the following number:
1-800-BITE-ME
Growup. That's the problem with you socialists. You dish it out but can't deal with the truth. Jim Rob would NEVER go to your board and voice empty threats because WE'RE THE ADULTS. Btw, I have the links to threads where your "children" have done the same. Whole threads of posts and insults. Even a freepers bio posted for ridicule. Still wanna play?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.