Posted on 02/25/2013 9:25:42 PM PST by Seizethecarp
Today, I had a conversation with an investigator from the Cold Case Posse in AZ. We talked and I expanded on several dossiers filled with evidence for over an hour. They asked for all of my relevant information on Obama, the Harry Bounel alias evidence, and the dossiers I completed on Stanley Ann Dunham, her parents, and Michelle Obama as well. They have it all. BTW they also say that it looks like my information cannot be disproved and will be useful.
I have proof, definitive proof that Stanley Ann Dunham was in WA state in "1961" as per the issuance of a SSN numident in her name with the SSN 535-40-8522. There is no way that she was in HI and I have proof because in the fall she was in college in WA, not HI.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Gestapo comes to mind.
The discussion will proceed quite nicely once you start providing source material and links for your assertions instead of telling others to "ask nicely" or "go find it themselves".
The only "pee and wind" I see is you standing at the bow of a boat under way relieving yourself, as unladylike as that is.
Gestapo comes to mind.
How so?
Don’t bother, a freeper who I think should know, wrote to me some time ago to tell me that this lovely man was the best lawyer on FR. I don’t know how it came about, but maybe that’s what he told the freeper and said freeper believed it. Sometimes I wonder, if it was true, maybe that’s one of zero’s lawyers we are responding to. He’s not interested in anything to do with getting on with sharing information or research, he’s only interested in pinning his victims against the wall.
Started his career as a prosecutor probably. Everyone is guilty before they can prove they are innocent is the MO.
I’ve finished with you. Thanks for playing, but you have become predictable and that’s boring.
Yep...and that is why I ask questions. Are you an in-the-loop somebody yourself or just a skirt tail clinger?
Where is the proof of this elusive "truth"? When will those of us out-of-the-loop nobody nothings finally get to see it? Next year? Never? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
How did finding out the truth about "Fred's" gender work out for you?
I think it is a fine line ,if the a/line exists at all, to say and recognize something as a ‘fake’ versus saying such is not a ‘fraud’ when talking in the public domain.
keep digging, troll.
You must be out of work again.
Why don't you ping that person and let's put it on the boards for all to see.
Or shall I ping them? If you want to go there I'll gladly do just that!
Where is the egg going to be? I've still got the mail!
not even close. I doubt he even finished high school.
I think it’s best if I stay out of it, we are giving oxygen to a malignant force - he’s just uncovered that screen names are not always indicative of gender, and probably would go into shock to learn that the famous french author George Sand, was a female.
There’s no hope of any advance here. I may post a few items for the record later in the day, but otherwise, it’s a total waste of time.
No more pearls before swine.
What your watching is mediation in the format of a trial. The plaintiff and defendant have signed an agreement to have their case adjudicated by a mediator, Judge Judy. Judge Judy is not bound by the rules of the Court.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
I know that Judge Judy does follow the basic rules of evidence. However, if you want a better source, check out http://www.cochranfirm.com/resources/PersonalInjury/burdenofproof.html.
“The person bringing the lawsuit, the plaintiff, has the burden of proving the elements of his lawsuit. In a civil case, the plaintiff must prove his case by a preponderance of the evidence. That means that he must prove a fact and his damages by showing that something is more likely so than not, i.e. 50.1% versus 49.9%.
“If the judge or jury believes the plaintiff and defendant equally, the plaintiff has failed to meet his burden of proof and his claim must fail. In other words, the tie goes to the defendant. The defendant does not have to prove anything. The defense is free to simply poke holes in the case of the plaintiff.”
There’s more at the website, but, like I said before, allegations carry absolutely no weight in a court. You need evidence. Without it, you don’t have a leg to stand on and you will lose without the defendant having to lift a finger!
Yeah, I've seen the video. (meaning I watched it after you linked it) Trying to raise viewership thus the reason no title was given.
It has almost 50 views now! It's couples dancing! Big whoop. The title is...MAL I VAL which is "oh so close" to Mal-Val, isn't it.
Your point?
What evidence is needed?
OMG! Surely even you aren't that obtuse!
So you posted a link to a YouTube video with no title that, in the end, was couples dancing and you think that such is proof that Valerie and Malcolm are the parents of the sitting POTUS and I'm the clown?
This question of mine...Where is the evidence to back it up?...was a request for you to provide such evidence of parentage.
EPIC FAIL on the part of Brown Deer.
So now I'm a troll as well?! I'm a one stop shop for you, aren't I! All your personal little demons all rolled up in one neat package.
Since you're here as well you must be in the same boat!
At least I've been gone a while as my posting history will show. Have you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.