Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sheriff Joe Now Investigating Obama Alias Harry Bounel: Obama Mama In WA In 1961 (Arpaio)
BirtherReport.com ^ | February 25, 2013 | Al Hendershot

Posted on 02/25/2013 9:25:42 PM PST by Seizethecarp

Today, I had a conversation with an investigator from the Cold Case Posse in AZ. We talked and I expanded on several dossiers filled with evidence for over an hour. They asked for all of my relevant information on Obama, the Harry Bounel alias evidence, and the dossiers I completed on Stanley Ann Dunham, her parents, and Michelle Obama as well. They have it all. BTW they also say that it looks like my information cannot be disproved and will be useful.

I have proof, definitive proof that Stanley Ann Dunham was in WA state in "1961" as per the issuance of a SSN numident in her name with the SSN 535-40-8522. There is no way that she was in HI and I have proof because in the fall she was in college in WA, not HI.

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Heated Discussion; Politics
KEYWORDS: afterbirfturds; arizona; awjeez; awjeeznotthisagain; birftards; birtherbs; birthers; bs; certifigate; conspiracy; doesntiteverstop; harrybounel; hawaii; joearpaio; kenyanbornmuzzie; naturalborncitizen; obama; sheriffjoe; stanleyanndunham; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 851-869 next last

1 posted on 02/25/2013 9:25:48 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Great news...good to see the Posse still active.

Of course, the so called “conservative” media will refuse to report this....too busy with talking about Michelle’s booty and the MSNBC hyped squester. Sad we have so many PhonyCon Obama Supporters (I’m looking at you Hannity, Levin, Coulter, Malkin, et al) who continue to give Obama a pass on eligibility


2 posted on 02/25/2013 9:30:42 PM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void; LucyT; Red Steel; Flotsam_Jetsome

“There is no way that she was in HI and I have proof because in the fall she was in college in WA, not HI.”

Al Hendershot says he has confirmed Arpaio Posse interest in his Harry Bounel file and the links to Mooshell.

While Hendershot has been an able investigator of Barry’s SS# trail it appears that it is news to Hendershot that Barry’s mom was in WA in the fall of 1961. Being in HI in the fall of 1961 does NOT prove that SADO was not in HI earlier in the year, of course.


3 posted on 02/25/2013 9:36:17 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Bump


4 posted on 02/25/2013 9:37:07 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

It might prove she wasn’t in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961??


5 posted on 02/25/2013 9:37:52 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

It might prove she wasn’t in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961??


6 posted on 02/25/2013 9:38:07 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Do you have any information on the unwed Mother’s home in WA?

It may have been connected to the church they attended there...Unitarian?

I had read that they were on the Canadian border and used a Canadian hospital for deliveries for cost savings.

I have read nothing on this for a year or so.


7 posted on 02/25/2013 9:42:49 PM PST by 3D-JOY (If you missed FR as much as I did...please make an extra donation to keep it running...right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Do you have any information on the unwed Mother’s home in WA?

It may have been connected to the church they attended there...Unitarian?

I had read that they were on the Canadian border and used a Canadian hospital for deliveries for cost savings.

I have read nothing on this for a year or so.


8 posted on 02/25/2013 9:43:02 PM PST by 3D-JOY (If you missed FR as much as I did...please make an extra donation to keep it running...right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY

oops, sorry for double post. don’t think I did it.


9 posted on 02/25/2013 9:44:58 PM PST by 3D-JOY (If you missed FR as much as I did...please make an extra donation to keep it running...right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Everyone knows she was in WA state in the fall of 1961, it’s part of her wiki biography.

This is a big so what.


10 posted on 02/25/2013 9:50:11 PM PST by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty
I'm willing to keep an open mind on Obama’s eligibility, but I'm also pragmatic. President Obama was elected twice. No one is going to remove a sitting president on his second term. Can you imagine the absolute chaos this would cause? That doesn't make it right, btw, but it's something you should at least consider. Is Obama’s eligibility so important that it's worth tearing the country apart? You might think it's worth it, but most people, even good conservatives, probably wouldn't.

That's what upsets me about your post. You slander some folks, like Levin and Malkin, for being “PhonyCon” Obama supporters. Levin and Malkin are both great spokespeople for conservative causes. They aren't “Obama Supporters” simply because they disagree with you on eligibility.

11 posted on 02/25/2013 9:54:04 PM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

While Hendershot has been an able investigator of Barry’s SS# trail it appears that it is news to Hendershot that Barry’s mom was in WA in the fall of 1961. Being in HI in the fall of 1961 does NOT prove that SADO was not in HI earlier in the year, of course.


One thing to note: If SAD was in WA state the fall of ‘61...she would have had to been on the mainland for a while.

The airlines back them did not allow pregnant women 6 mos or more preg. to fly back then...especially an unaccompanied young pregnant women. Also, they were very strict on flying with relatively newborn children...and would have definitely raised alarm with an unaccompanied white women with a black/mixed race baby....even a liberal state like Hawaii would have prevented such travel

My mother experienced this when we had to go back overseas on an accompanied tour of Germany, and they tried to prevent my mom from traveling, as she was 6 mos along w my brother.


12 posted on 02/25/2013 9:54:49 PM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY

“Do you have any information on the unwed Mother’s home in WA?”

No. And I am not inclined to believe she and her family were portraying herself as unwed.

I accept the FOIA documentation as most likely genuine (it destroys Barry’s Dreams narrative). In those documents U of HI staff informed INS that BHO Sr. had impregnated and reportedly “married” a coed on the exact date claimed in the HI marriage record and divorce document, a coed who was living with her parents.

BHO Sr. was already suspected by INS and U of HI (and later Harvard) of being married and also that there was discussion of putting the child up for adoption with the Salvation Army likely due to SADO’s age and BHO Sr’s student status (and the baby’s race?).

Bottom line I don’t see a shameful hiding away in an unwed home, especially when the grandparents announce the birth in the newspaper (I am inclined to regard those announcements as genuine although they do not prove HI birth).


13 posted on 02/25/2013 9:59:49 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Other than it’s interesting, what difference will it make? No one will confront Obama about more egregious elements of his shady past than this.


14 posted on 02/25/2013 10:00:01 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

That’s what upsets me about your post. You slander some folks, like Levin and Malkin, for being “PhonyCon” Obama supporters. Levin and Malkin are both great spokespeople for conservative causes. They aren’t “Obama Supporters” simply because they disagree with you on eligibility.


Had they taken Obama Eligibility seriously, and not wasted their time and media sphere on piddling issues (who sits on an NRLB is trivial compared to the constiutional eligiblity of the President, Mr Levin)....Obama definitely would not have won a second term, possibly not even finished his first.

And, Michelle Malkin actually attacked the Cold Case Posse in some of her articles....referrring to the Posse and Obama Eligibility people as “Truthers” and comparing them to 9/11 Truthers. And you call that “good for conservative causes”?

It is more than indifference...some of these people have attacked Obama Eligibility folks as bad as MSNBC has (esp Malkin and Coulter). Levin always brags about his “Landmark Legal Foundation got Clinton’s law license revoked in Arkansas”....hey a President who is not eligible is much more important than one who got busy with an intern

They spend more time talking about Michelle Obama’s butt than they do on her husbands eligibility


15 posted on 02/25/2013 10:04:05 PM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

BTTT.


16 posted on 02/25/2013 10:07:33 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Bottom line I don’t see a shameful hiding away in an unwed home, especially when the grandparents announce the birth in the newspaper (I am inclined to regard those announcements as genuine although they do not prove HI birth).


A mixed race black/white baby in 1961 would something even the most liberal family would not want out in public. Even in liberal states back in the early ‘60s that was really frowned upon. Something that today would not be an issue....but 50 yrs ago would be


17 posted on 02/25/2013 10:11:21 PM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Is Obama’s eligibility so important that it’s worth tearing the country apart? You might think it’s worth it, but most people, even good conservatives, probably wouldn’t.

If it is a blatant breaking of the constitution, YES IT IS!!!

Some principles are worth suffering and even dying for, the TRUTH is one of those.


18 posted on 02/25/2013 10:12:43 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

You make it sound like the country isn’t being torn apart now.


19 posted on 02/25/2013 10:14:30 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty
I think it's a stretch to say “Obama definitely would not have won a second term” had Levin and Malkin taken Obama’s eligibility seriously, and the US Senate would have never voted to impeach Obama in his first term.

I think we'll find out more about President Obama after he's out of office, but the man's not going to be impeached. I think that's part of the reason why some conservatives aren't interested in pursuing “Truther” discussions. Pragmatically speaking, no one is going to remove a sitting president from office over the sort of “evidence” that's been presented so far or is likely to be found in the future.

As far as conservative pundits making fun of “Truthers,” some Truthers are nutjobs. Sorry. I've read some Obama eligibility theories that border on the absurd. I thought the Cold Case Posse did good work, but even they didn't say Obama’s documents were definite frauds. They only said the documents appeared fake. That's not conclusive evidence that Obama is ineligible.

20 posted on 02/25/2013 10:26:12 PM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
Is Obama’s eligibility so important that it's worth tearing the country apart? You might think it's worth it, but most people, even good conservatives, probably wouldn't.

So, you're willing to turn your back on the letter of the Constitution, just like that. Shameful.

Yes, this is that important, because if we relent on this one point, we'll have conceded ground to the Communists that may take a bloody revolution to recover.

And for your information, the country's already torn apart. The divide between left and right almost can't get any worse than it is right now.

21 posted on 02/25/2013 10:26:20 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp; Absolutely Nobama; aragorn; Art in Idaho; Aurorales; autumnraine; azishot; ...
Constitutional Eligibility

22 posted on 02/25/2013 10:31:32 PM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp; Absolutely Nobama; aragorn; Art in Idaho; Aurorales; autumnraine; azishot; ...
Constitutional Eligibility

23 posted on 02/25/2013 10:32:28 PM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

I guess I agree, but girls still did go away in the early 60’s.

It might also explain her friend saying she did not even know how to care for him. Maybe she went to school directly from a home with lots of help while recovering.

Maybe they married and then her family discovered he was already married? They would not have considered it legal, I think.

Wonder if we will ever get to the truth?


24 posted on 02/25/2013 10:34:12 PM PST by 3D-JOY (If you missed FR as much as I did...please make an extra donation to keep it running...right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

“A mixed race black/white baby in 1961 would something even the most liberal family would not want out in public.”

I think you are underestimating what attitudes there were in “the most liberal families” in 1960. I was actually in one at the time! The Dunhams went to the “Little Red Church,” a Unitarian Universalist church (name says it all), and the Mercer Island HS was an island of Marxist third-world liberation and diversity-loving enthusiasts, it would seem.


25 posted on 02/25/2013 10:34:24 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
No one is going to remove a sitting president on his second term.

Nixon?

26 posted on 02/25/2013 10:34:59 PM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

The country will not be torn apart if Obama is proven ineligible in a court of law. We have very organized method of succession. Biden becomes the president and he will appoint a VP.

But I won’t hold my breath expecting this to happen. But I am also keeping an open mind.


27 posted on 02/25/2013 10:36:16 PM PST by entropy12 (The republic is doomed when people figure out they can get free stuff by voting democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
TigersEye: “You make it sound like the country isn’t being torn apart now.”

You make it sound like it is. Seriously. People aren't dying in the streets over Obama’s eligibility, but they will if he's removed from office. Some people may want a civil war. I don't. We really, really need to peacefully resolve America's growing political and cultural divisions. Violence should (must!) be avoided until there is no other recourse.

Truthers are never going to see President Obama removed from office (over eligibility). There's no tool to do that. Courts can't remove a sitting president. Congress could, but it won't. That's reality. Sorry.

28 posted on 02/25/2013 10:36:30 PM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

“You might think it’s worth it, but most people, even good conservatives, probably wouldn’t.”

Voiding everything he has signed his name to would be fantastic!!!

All the commissions he’s approved and the people he’s hired under them would be fired, including eliminating Homeland Security and Obamacare!!!!


29 posted on 02/25/2013 10:38:09 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Wow! OK.


30 posted on 02/25/2013 10:39:56 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Thanks for the pings!


31 posted on 02/25/2013 10:43:30 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
Is Obama’s eligibility so important that it's worth tearing the country apart?

Considering the damage he has done/is doing?... Yes, yes it is.

32 posted on 02/25/2013 10:43:50 PM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Nixon was finished when his own party turned on him.

There are many reasons to believe that Barry is at his final momentary early second-term peak in popularity and that he is about to swan-dive into extreme unpopularity due to his economy-crushing Marxist/crony-capitalist policies.

His thrashing around trying to put something up on the scoreboard smacks of desperation, IMO (gun grabbing? minimum wage increase?) and it is all small-ball so far.

Every day lots of sane people getting crushed by Obamacare are saying “If I get the chance to damage this creep I will do it” and that includes a lot of folks in his own party.

As long as they keep the White House by moving Biden in to be followed (they hope) by Hilarious, they have nothing to lose if an extremely unpopular Barry is exposed as a fraud.

Hey, a guy can hope, right?


33 posted on 02/25/2013 10:43:50 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Do you have the research on their home ownership?

Names, SS#’s and lots of irregularities? More than just the land added to the property.

Check out who is billed for the taxes! Who pays them?


34 posted on 02/25/2013 10:49:06 PM PST by 3D-JOY (If you missed FR as much as I did...please make an extra donation to keep it running...right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I think I’m just being realistic. I read eligibility articles with interest. For example, I thought the Cold Case Posse made a compelling case. However, it’s not enough to impeach a sitting president.

We’re still finding out secrets from WWII and the Cold War. I think that would happen here even if President Obama turned out to be ineligible. I could be proven wrong, of course, but he’s already survived one term. I think that’s why conservative pundits don’t want to spend any more time on Truthers. I think they’d rather focus on problems they might be able to help change.


35 posted on 02/25/2013 11:00:17 PM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

She could have easily traveled with her six week old infant and still attended school in the fall.

I also seriously doubt that an airline flying from Hawaii had any thoughts at all about mixed race baby from the state with the highest level of mixed races. That is a silly assertion.


36 posted on 02/25/2013 11:02:38 PM PST by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Impeachment wouldn’t be necessarily since Obama has never been Constitutionally eligible to hold office. He would be considered nothing more than a de facto officer.


37 posted on 02/25/2013 11:02:55 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
I think I’m just being realistic.

So does 0bama. Everyone does for that matter.

FWIW I said nothing about violence or wanting a CW. I said nothing about the eligibility issue. I could also site dozens of instances of violence in the streets that have occurred over that last four years but it would be a waste of time.

38 posted on 02/25/2013 11:04:17 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Biden was not elected in his own name, but as attached to “0”. There was early talk of his election falling right along with “0”. Interesting that the rules I read are before or after swearing in, in January. I think there were many opinions flying about early in the first election.

This is going to go on for a long time. The illegality of applying for student loans as a foreign student may be the biggest “catch 22” for him someday. Failure to register for the draft would add to those facts.

Why would he hide so much information and falsify so much, as well spend all the money to defend his position if all was OK?

I enjoy learning all the theories and hoping I live long enough to learn which are the truth! I expect no change during this term, but I can hope!


39 posted on 02/25/2013 11:09:18 PM PST by 3D-JOY (If you missed FR as much as I did...please make an extra donation to keep it running...right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Conservatives haven’t relented on a slew of constitutional issues, but the people in power do what they want regardless. You act like this particular issue is the one worth fighting for. What about the commerce clause distortions, the taking of private property rights, Roe v. Wade, unreasonable searches, etc? Do you think the natural born citizen issue is more important than all the other constitutional distortions?

Let me put it this way. I believe there’s something shady in Obama’s past. He’s hiding something. I don’t know what it is, but I’m pretty sure there’s something there. Would I like to know more? Sure. I fully support those who want to investigate further. I just don’t think there’s anything we can realistically do to impeach him. That’s not turning my back on the constitution. It’s accepting reality.


40 posted on 02/25/2013 11:14:15 PM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

A court can’t remove a sitting president. He can only be impeached.


41 posted on 02/25/2013 11:16:00 PM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I am slightly worried about all the people preparing for more violence. Will there be an outlet for all that effort?

Will a small event set it on motion?

Storms or other interruption of services might cool that steam.


42 posted on 02/25/2013 11:16:14 PM PST by 3D-JOY (If you missed FR as much as I did...please make an extra donation to keep it running...right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY
I am slightly worried about all the people preparing for more violence. Will there be an outlet for all that effort?

Are you talking about the unions? The OWS people? The BATFE? The Drone Program? What "people preparing for more violence" are you talking about?

43 posted on 02/25/2013 11:19:32 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Court cases are just to get the information forced into the public domain. Aren’t they? I think I read that getting to discovery is their goal.


44 posted on 02/25/2013 11:19:52 PM PST by 3D-JOY (If you missed FR as much as I did...please make an extra donation to keep it running...right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Maybe Trump needs to up his reward for odumbi’s records to 50 million.


45 posted on 02/25/2013 11:20:47 PM PST by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

No, those who are becoming armed, storing food, buying land and seeds. We even have women’s groups learning to home can foodstuffs again. Bunkers, Water purification and solar powered communications are constantly being discussed.

There is even planned a seminar on advanced first aid etc.


46 posted on 02/25/2013 11:24:44 PM PST by 3D-JOY (If you missed FR as much as I did...please make an extra donation to keep it running...right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY
Is this the violence you are talking about?

TV anchor: 'Race-baiters' behind black-mob claims

Ravi Baichwal is not going to like this: Three-thousand people fought, looted, rioted, assaulted, cursed, threatened, hurled racial epithets and vandalized a Chicago neighborhood over the weekend.

Don't worry, I am told there is no violence in the streets.

47 posted on 02/25/2013 11:26:52 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

Maybe Trump can offer enough for Hillary to tell what she knows.??

I can’t believe she did not have the facts.


48 posted on 02/25/2013 11:28:38 PM PST by 3D-JOY (If you missed FR as much as I did...please make an extra donation to keep it running...right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

TomasUSMC: “Maybe Trump needs to up his reward for odumbi’s records to 50 million.”

Oh, I think there’s something there. I just don’t know what it is, and it doesn’t necessarily have to be about Obama’s place of birth. Maybe he just didn’t think a blatantly Marxist past would help him get elected, or maybe he doesn’t really know who his father is. Who knows?

I don’t have a problem with Truthers per se. I only started posting on this thread because Levin and Malkin were being slandered. I think someone can be a good conservative without believing Obama is a Saudi-owned Manchurian Candidate or some of the other absurd conspiracy theories I’ve read.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Manchurian_Candidate


49 posted on 02/25/2013 11:28:54 PM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY
No, those who are becoming armed, storing food, buying land and seeds.

People have been doing that for decades. I don't see anyone needing "an outlet for all that effort." I suppose preparedness is a waste of time though since nothing bad is happening in this country.

50 posted on 02/25/2013 11:29:16 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 851-869 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson