Skip to comments.Opinion: If Romney wins ("He inherited wealth") [Blech]
Posted on 11/04/2012 12:07:48 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Playwright George Bernard Shaw warned us, Power does not corrupt men; fools, however, if they get into a position of power, corrupt power. It's a forecast of coming attractions should Mitt Romney steal the Seal next Tuesday.
So here's the deal: Mitt Romney's a phony. While Hurricane Sandy's damage proliferated this week, his campaign rally disguised as a storm relief event encapsulates the façade. He inherited wealth. He is a man with no core, no principles, no understanding of ordinary citizens' plights, no concrete proposals to fix the country's problems. He respects few besides his super-wealthy cronies. He disrespects journalists. He exudes disdain for women. His disrespect for the President of the United States cascaded with condescension during their first debate. He disrespects the American people's intelligence by misstating his own record and comments, even within hours of having made them, and expects you to buy into his falsehoods.
His campaign has been defined by platitudes and lies, acknowledged by his pollster who said that they would not be deterred by fact-checkers. It's false that President Barack Obama has mismanaged the economy; it's been slowly recovering for years despite Republicans blocking every major jobs and other economic proposals presented by the president to a do-nothing Congress.
Romney's latest lie is his Oct. 25 statement to an Ohio rally that Jeep was thinking of moving all production to China. Despite being immediately refuted by the Chrysler Corporation, the message is continuing in radio and television ads.
So here's a peek into life under a Romney/Ryan administration, telegraphed by campaign pronouncements and practices and Mitt's reign as Massachusetts governor.
Medicare will be replaced by a voucher system that will substantially increase health care costs for seniors.
Secrecy will be widespread, covering issues positions and policies similar to his secrecy during the campaign. Romney has been so secretive that he refused to take questions from any reporter during the past three weeks.
Voting rights will be curtailed over time in a drive for a one-party state, the Republican/Tea Party variety. Republican-promulgated voter suppression laws and voter intimidation projects in the key battleground states have been one of this year's big stories.
Government regulation will increase, not decrease, into private matters such as abortion, contraception and other health issues. The permanency of these changes will be ordained by the appointment of more radically activist justices to the Supreme Court, pushing a 5-4 conservative majority even further to the right and assuring the reversal of Roe v. Wade.
Mitt Romney may have aggressively debated Barack Obama but he has been meek elsewhere. He declined to challenge Richard Mourdock when the extreme right-wing Indiana Senate candidate claimed that a rape victim's pregnancy was God's will. He's cowered before Rush Limbaugh.
Shannon O'Brien, his opponent in the 2002 Massachusetts gubernatorial race, discounts Romney's promise to work with Democrats. You can look at how he governed, she said. He vetoed 800 pieces of legislation like the minimum wage or access to contraceptive rights Sometimes they were petty (like) a special bill that would have helped a disabled cop; vetoing money that would have paid for kosher meals for elderly people in nursing homes I think something like 750 vetoes were overridden by the Democratic legislature. That doesn't sound like a guy who was playing ball with people on the other side.
During the last few days we've witnessed genuine bipartisan leadership as President Obama, joined by New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, illustrated hands-on involvement with the start of clean-up operations in Hurricane Sandy's wake. It is community organizing at the state and national level.
This brings us back to George Bernard Shaw.
Romney's repeated commitments to undo programs that have built this country over several generations and his comments to wealthy donors in a private meeting that he's not concerned about 47 percent of Americans demonstrate clearly that these fools will corrupt the power they'd inherit following a victory next Tuesday.
Martin Sheen, who played President Bartlet in the Emmy-winning series West Wing, recently said: Mr. Romney really showed how stupid he is and arrogant. There's an old phrase, arrogance is ignorance matured, and that's what we saw He's never had to compete for a job or face eviction or struggle to get a college loan. He's a guy that the old phrase applies to: he was born on third base and thought he hit a triple.'
Next Tuesday we'll learn whether all Mitt's resources have enabled him to steal home or whether he'll be tagged out at the plate.
Oh, my. Several people who have heard the full 47% quote tell me they are not likely to vote for Romney. Especially some friends living on modest, mostly SS benefits in their old age.
Let me see if I have this straight: ROMNEY is a phony?
I’m afraid that this joker is caught on the wrong side of the looking-glass.
Michael Zucker. 1 percenter, liberal.
As Reince Priebus wrote:
As Romney told a C-SPAN interviewer in 2006:
"I did get a check from my dad when he passed away. I shouldnt say a check, but I did inherit some funds from my dad. But I turned and gave that away to charity. In this case I gave it to a school which Brigham Young University established in his honor. ... And thats where his inheritance ended up."
Why did he give the money away?
"I figured we had enough of our own," he said.
I doubt they heard the full quote, that tape was edited
The Tahoe Daily Tribune ^ | November 3, 2012 | Michael Zucker, stockbroker & guest columnist................
ROTFL. Like it matters. Take a hike, Zucker, you sucker.
This guy is a stockbroker? In Tahoe no less? I would never trust this guy with my money. Holy cow.
Zucker has partaken of too much Obama cocktail! One sip and you become a bumbling, rambling idiot who focuses solely on repeating the fraudulent tales of MSNBC and completely ignor and shortcomings or screw-ups of our current White House occupant. The cocktail is habit forming and paid for by your tax dollars....please pray that Mitt wins big....I don’t want the Obama lawyers slowing down the Eject Obama Express!
A silly Liberal rant—watch out, more like him in MSM will be hitting Mitt when he wins—anything he does will be seen as a negative “Rich Guy” with no soul. In truth many Liberals will be glad to see Obama Gone. He failed them too.
Remind me where the Kennedy clan got their money.
Liars, reprobates, and sociopaths are generally the folks who accuse others of the very tactics they themselves plan to use. They are so adept at it, they cannot comprehend or recognize the literal truth even when it is standing right in front of them! Or that someone else would conduct themselves in a humble and god-fearing manner. This is the face and work of true evil! But this battle belongs to the LORD!!!!
I heard the entire quote, and it’s meaning was obvious to me, so the fact it’s that people are deliberately distorting the meaning. He clearly meant that he was not concerned in their VOTES, because he was never going to change their mind.
Try Midol, Michael Zucker.
Icepack, Preperation H?
From the few seconds of research I did, he’s a San Francisco transplant. Surprised?
If Mitt wins, the liberals will lose their ever hating minds.
Anyone STARTING OUT with a quote from the Eugenist GEORGE BERNARD SHAW who personally believed in the EXTERMINATION OF THE “SOCIALLY INCOMPATIBLE is already “suspect” from the start.
“The notion that persons should be safe from extermination as long as they do not commit willful murder, or levy war against the Crown, or kidnap, or throw vitriol, is not only to limit social responsibility unnecessarily, and to privilege the large range of intolerable misconduct that lies outside them, but to divert attention from the essential justification for extermination, which is always incorrigible social incompatibility and nothing else.”
Source: George Bernard Shaw, “On the Rocks” (1933), Preface.
USE OF GAS CHAMBERS
“We should find ourselves committed to killing a great many people whom we now leave living, and to leave living a great many people whom we at present kill. We should have to get rid of all ideas about capital punishment
A part of eugenic politics would finally land us in an extensive use of the lethal chamber. A great many people would have to be put out of existence simply because it wastes other people’s time to look after them.”
Source: George Bernard Shaw, Lecture to the Eugenics Education Society, Reported in The Daily Express,March 4, 1910.
KILLING THOSE “UNFIT TO LIVE”
“The moment we face it frankly we are driven to the conclusion that the community has a right to put a price on the right to live in it If people are fit to live, let them live under decent human conditions. If they are not fit to live, kill them in a decent human way. Is it any wonder that some of us are driven to prescribe the lethal chamber as the solution for the hard cases which are at present made the excuse for dragging all the other cases down to their level, and the only solution that will create a sense of full social responsibility in modern populations?”
Source: George Bernard Shaw, Prefaces (London: Constable and Co., 1934), p. 296.
Not much of anything surprises me these days. When I was in Tahoe, there were more sheiks there than there were in Saudi Arabia. It was very uncomfortable. They do like American women and they are obnoxious about it.
Rolex liberals are evil SOBs...
Such sore losers already.....oh wait - they lost when they first elected the “One.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.