Proposed National Ocean Policy is Bad Politics and Worse Policy

Rigzone ^ | ,October 01, 2012 | Michael Whatley | Monday

[Rabin]

Obama Administration is poised to implant a National Ocean Policy that will involve mandatory ocean and coastal zoning, led by nine regional planning bodies, overseen by a White House-led "National Ocean Council".... that last summer proposed to reduce the impacts of stressors such as resource extraction, to address (man-made) climate change.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has reversed plans for expanded offshore development, citing the National Ocean Policy Executive Order as justification. One office of (the) Administration is justifying its actions based on another office that no one knows anything about.

[Rabin]

Ken Salazar has reversed plans for expanded offshore development, whoda thunk?

R.

[LtKerst]

This is what America Gets when It Elects Democrats...

There are No GOOD Democrats....

They are Insane or the enablers of the Insane.

[Mortrey]

Is this another name for L.O.S.T.????

Since Bath-House Barry lost the Law of the Sea Treaty, he’s probably re-named it.

Bastard! (both figuratively AND literally.)

[Rabin]

Lt K, “There are No GOOD Democrats.”

There are No GOOD Democrats.
Flash friend, there lots and lots of good Democratic Party members. Many will vote for any-one but 0 & ilk, in a bit.

Thanks, Rab.

Ps, sorta >>> Democrats need not be democratic. All democratic folks, need not be Democrats.

Any Democrat Party member to vote as an informed American, is very good.

The gimme a free Ifone, Susi types, are Chicago thug 0lings. Maybe mostly Democrats. Probability not democratic.

Rab.

[fella]

Sounds like the “One” is planning to dictate some more Executive Orders.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

This is just more bureaucratic B.S. using ‘software’(thoughts on a whiteboard) in another agency.

Agency B won’t take any action but offers ‘guidance’ until Agency A formulates a policy on an invented issue , and has a ‘ hard copy ‘( in a written form ). This is a delay in place policy ( think stalling) because nothing is yet in printed word / hard copy. But both Agency A and Agency B act as though it is already lawful.

Then they create their own advisory board of carefully chosen people who think-alike , and then create another more local board who think-alike to issue local directives .
None of these boards are elected officials , but they act like they have authority and power.

EXAMPLE : Obamacare
THEME : “ You have to pass it to find out what is in it “
SOFTWARE: It was a policy on a whiteboard ,a concept . Nothing yet in writing when passed .
AGENCY : Health and Human Services formulate policy & method of implementation (think-tank boards). Rewrite/ Ammend . Source of Policy guidance.
HARDWARE : 2800 pages of policy ,new boards ,new agencies , funding sources , etc.
AGENCY SUB-BOARD : Regional board for local implementation and source of regional guidance

This is right out of AGENDA 21
Micro-management
Carefully selected Regional think-alike boards - not elected
Local regional (think-tank) boards who claim authority and legitimacy ` not elected
More micro-management which leads to restrictions / limitations

[Elsiejay]

This “Policy” will become Law by Executive Fiat if Obama is re-elected. Even if not re-elected, he is likely to so declare it during the waning days between 6 Nov. and mid January, along with a flurry of other proclamations of his Socialist, anti-Constitution policy preferences.