Posted on 08/29/2023 10:48:58 AM PDT by Red Badger
Do you find yourself drinking a sweetened beverage every day? Be cautious, as this habit could increase the risk of chronic liver disease and even liver cancer.
It is widely known that consuming sweetened drinks can contribute to obesity and insulin resistance. A recent prospective cohort study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) has further revealed detrimental health effects linked to sweetened drinks, particularly concerning liver disease. The study showed that individuals who regularly consume sweetened drinks face an astonishing 85 percent higher likelihood of developing liver cancer and a 68 percent higher risk of mortality from chronic liver disease than those who consume fewer sweetened drinks.
Elevated Risks of Liver Cancer and Liver Disease
This study was led by scientists from Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and it drew data from a comprehensive prospective clinical database in the United States: the Women’s Health Initiative. The database has been gathering information from a cohort of over 160,000 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79. The information collection concluded in 2020, spanning a follow-up period of approximately 21 years.
“Epidemiological studies on dietary factors and liver cancer and chronic liver disease mortality are limited,” the researchers emphasized in the report. “To our knowledge, this is the first study to report an association between sugar-sweetened beverage intake and chronic liver disease mortality.”
Participants completed the survey questionnaire detailing their consumption of sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened drinks, excluding fruit juices. These individuals were divided into three groups:
* Women who consumed three servings or less per month.
* Women who drank one to six servings per week.
* Women who drank one or more servings per day (with one serving equivalent to 12 ounces or 355 milliliters, roughly the size of a standard beverage can).
The findings revealed that women who consumed one or more servings of sweetened drinks daily had an 85 percent higher risk of developing liver cancer than those who drank three servings or less per month. Additionally, their mortality rate due to chronic liver disease was 68 percent higher.
In the study, “chronic liver disease” refers to conditions like nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cirrhosis, liver fibrosis, alcoholic liver disease, and chronic hepatitis. During the calculation, potential factors that could influence liver disease, including age, ethnicity, education level, smoking and alcohol consumption habits, and body mass index, were taken into account.
Known risk factors for liver cancer include hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) infections, metabolic disorders, excessive alcohol consumption, and foods contaminated with aflatoxins, such as peanuts and corn. “However, approximately 40% of patients with liver cancer do not have these risk factors. … Therefore, it is important to identify dietary risk factors for liver cancer and chronic liver disease mortality,” the researchers stated in the report.
The Impact of Sweetened Drinks on the Liver
Other studies have also corroborated the damaging effects of sweetened drinks on the liver.
A prospective European cohort study revealed that individuals who consume over six servings of soft drinks per week face a notably higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (the most common form of liver cancer) by 83 percent compared to those who consume fewer than one serving. The risk increases by 6 percent for each additional serving per week. Another study conducted in the United States indicated that drinking sugar-sweetened soda is associated with an 18 percent increase in the risk of liver cancer.
Research has also demonstrated a link between sweetened drink consumption and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease onset. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in the European Journal of Nutrition revealed that individuals who consumed the highest amounts of sugar-sweetened drinks had a 40 percent increased odds of developing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease compared to those who consumed the least. Another study in 2022 proposed that individuals who frequently consume sugar-sweetened drinks have 2.53 times increased odds of developing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease compared to those who rarely drink such beverages.
In the recent JAMA study mentioned earlier, the authors concluded that the main factors contributing to the threat to liver health from sweetened drinks are the following:
* Sweetened drinks may contribute to obesity and spikes in blood sugar, leading to insulin resistance—all of which are risk factors for liver cancer and liver disease.
* Sweetened drinks contain significant amounts of fructose, which can lead to the buildup of liver fat and, in turn, potentially trigger the development of liver cancer.
* Consuming sweetened drinks can lead to abnormal blood lipid levels and have an adverse impact on gut microbiota, which in turn affects liver health.
* Metabolites produced after consumption (such as taurine and phenylalanine) are linked to liver cell carcinoma.
* Sweetened drinks contain various chemicals (such as caramel color and additives) that may harm the body.
Researchers Urge Caution
While establishing a clear link between sugar-sweetened drinks and liver disease, the results of this study indicate that the consumption of artificially sweetened drinks is not significantly associated with liver cancer or chronic liver disease mortality.
“This finding is not that surprising,” said the two lead authors of the study, Longgang Zhao, a postdoctoral research fellow at the Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Xuehong Zhang, associate professor at Harvard Medical School and Associate Epidemiologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, during an interview with The Epoch Times. They explained this is because “the consumption level of artificially sweetened beverages is low in this population (postmenopausal women) and the sample size of liver cancer and death due to chronic liver diseases is relatively small.”
However, they emphasized that “these results should be interpreted with caution”—in other words, the results do not mean artificially sweetened drinks are safer than sugar-sweetened drinks. “Additionally, other studies also indicate that artificially sweetened beverages have been associated with a higher risk of obesity, Type 2 diabetes, all-cause mortality, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease incidence,” the authors said. Therefore, further research is needed.
Additionally, this study noted that substituting one serving of sugar-sweetened drink with one serving of coffee or tea daily, while lacking statistical significance, is linked to a decrease in the incidence of liver cancer and chronic liver disease mortality.
‘Low-Sugar Diet’ as a Public Health Strategy
This is a high-quality study that “points to a link between sugar and liver disease and liver cancer,” said Dr. Jason Fung, author of “The Obesity Code” and “The Cancer Code” and a nephrologist specializing in reversing Type 2 diabetes, acknowledging the study’s findings in an interview with The Epoch Times. However, he also noted, “It’s an observational study, which is less robust than a controlled trial.”
The authors admitted that this research should not be hastily assumed to imply causation.
Additionally, due to the study questionnaire’s design, the differentiation of types of sweetened drinks is limited, and it is not possible to specifically categorize artificial sweeteners.
However, Mr. Zhang and Mr. Zhao noted, “If our study findings are confirmed, reducing the consumption of sweetened beverages could become a public health strategy to alleviate the burden of liver disease.”
“We should be promoting a diet lower in sugar, rather than the previous confused nutritional messaging of just reducing calories and reducing fat,” said Dr. Fung.
“Given that the study focused on postmenopausal women, studies involving men and younger women are needed to examine the associations more comprehensively. Furthermore, more research is needed to elucidate the potential mechanisms (linking sweetened-drink consumption to liver disease and liver cancer) by integrating genetics, animal/experimental studies, and -omics data,” explained Mr. Zhang and Mr. Zhao.
Thanks, Red Badger!
“While establishing a clear link between sugar-sweetened drinks and liver disease, the results of this study indicate that the consumption of artificially sweetened drinks is not significantly associated with liver cancer or chronic liver disease mortality.”
Despite burying this significant piece of information deep within the article, the major point should have been that carbohydrates are the culprit — and not the “sweetness” of the food or drink. And it is not that artificial sweeteners are consumed in such miniscule amounts as to have virtually zero metabolic impact — so much as it was that previous studies trying to implicate artificial sweeteners were provided in huge doses equivalent to the consumption of 100+ cans of diet soft drinks — which is virtually impossible for any human to consume on a daily basis. However, the FDA ruling was that if a product could be implicated in ANY amount — even an impossible amount, it could be labeled as cancer-causing.
So there is very real harm done by the vested interests in fundraising for their particular diseases — not to get to the root of the metabolic syndromes — caused by the overconsumption or intolerance to carbohydrates which affect the blood sugar and insulin levels that wreak havoc on the human body in the multiplicity of comorbidities that make one susceptible to further compromise and complications.
There’s good news. The zero-calorie artificial sweeteners such as aspartame aren’t mentioned.
Just the simple switch from carbohydrates (sugars) to zero carbohydrates (artificial sweeteners) would make a huge impact on eliminating at least half of the metabolic diseases — beginning with obesity. That’s more than half the battle. That is the greatest reward to risk.
Way to bury the lede:
“he results of this study indicate that the consumption of artificially sweetened drinks is not significantly associated with liver cancer or chronic liver disease mortality. “
Everything is bad for you. Don’t eat, drink, or breathe carbon.
Banning sweet tea “ for your health” could also shorten your life. significantly....
Fresh Fruit must be DEADLY
Great flick.
he sometimes would sneak out on the exit balcony and have a cigarette, against the rules of course......
we let him.....
one stinking vice is not the end all especially one that does not impact anyone else.
Everyone that has ever eaten fruit has, or will, die.
Genetics plays a big role.
There are a couple of interesting genetic variations that are being studied for fatty liver disease. I have several of them.
And while it is true that they really aren’t sure how this plays out we can see what happened with me. I had fatty liver disease. It mysteriously disappeared. I had only lost a small amount of weight in between but I have variations that have an effect on how I process fat. So Doctors have theorized that my genetic variations gives an exaggerated effect on fatty liver disease. However there is no way to know because there are other factors that might have also contributed to the mysterious disappearance.
It is all a crapshoot.
I mean this is surprising to no one... recently I wandered down the fruit juice aisle in a grocery store. I had no idea they were still pushing this crap on people, and then couldn’t figure out who was still buying this? Apparently “fruit juice” is part of WIC subsidies and food stamps. So unhealthy agra is just funded by the US govt.
Don’t drink your sugar... AND fruit juices are as bad as any soda.
Definitely. Then there’s the what’s healthy for one organ might cause issues with others.
I have tried numerous variations of nutrition while also changing my exercise routine.
Turns out moderation works... :)
People who take any kind of medication....OTC or prescription need to make sure that grapefruit juice isn’t going to cause a problem..like Ivermectin
It might be true, but you can’t trust establishment medicine now after CoVid.
Instead of analyzing the study, it’s now more important to determine who stands to gain from the conclusions.
One thing is clear now, the interests of public heath are not a priority.
Everything causes cancer. It would be a mighty short list for things that didn’t cause cancer.
“aspartame is poison”
From Wikipedia:
Aspartame is one of the most studied food additives in the human food supply. Reviews by over 100 governmental regulatory bodies found the ingredient safe for consumption at the normal acceptable daily intake (ADI) limit
... it takes approximately 21 cans of diet soda daily to consume [enough aspartame to surpass the FDA’s daily limit].
Regarding the zevia drink, which uses stevia for sweetening, Wikipedia says this:
Two 2010 review studies found no health concerns with Stevia rebaudiana or its sweetening extracts.
So we’re both good!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.