Top Senate Democratic candidates refuse to say whether men can get pregnant, or define the word 'woman'

Fox News via MSN ^ | 7/26/22 | Kyle Morris, Jayme Chandler

[Libloather]

Several Democrats who are seeking election or re-election in states around the country refused to provide a definition for the word "woman" or offer their thoughts on whether men have the capacity to become pregnant.

Fox News Digital reached out to multiple Democratic candidates about the topics and received no responses from the campaigns of Sens. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., and Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., and Senate nominees John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, Tim Ryan of Ohio, and Cheri Beasley of North Carolina.

Ahead of the midterm elections, and amid the debate on whether abortion should be protected federally, several individuals, including members of the media, have started defending the contentious notion that men have the ability to get pregnant and have abortions.

In May, Aimee Arrambide, the executive director of the pro-choice nonprofit Avow Texas, was asked by Rep. Dan Bishop, R-N.C., to define what "a woman is" during her testimony on abortion as a Democrat witness before the House Judiciary Committee.

"I believe that everyone can identify for themselves," she responded.

Bishop then asked Arrambide whether she believes "men can become pregnant and have abortions," to which she simply responded, "Yes."

Earlier this month, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., made headlines after he clashed with a liberal University of California-Berkeley professor whom he questioned for her repeated use of the term "people with a capacity for pregnancy" during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the Supreme Court's recent ruling on abortion. Hawley asked Professor Khiara Bridges if she meant to refer to "women" when she repeatedly used the phrase.

"There are also trans-men who have the capacity for pregnancy," Bridges replied, adding that "cis-women" and "non-binary people" do get pregnant from sexual intercourse. Bridges also called Hawley's questioning "transphobic and opens up trans-people to violence."

[American Infidel]

The Republicans running against these woke idiots need to hammer this at every opportunity. Ask it at the debates, and repeat it every time they are in front of a camera. They should also make political ads with their democrat opponents stating that biological men can get pregnant. It is low-hanging fruit and a no-lose situation for the Republicans. They should also put the dems on the spot by asking if a 35-year old guy with a beard who simply declares that he is a 'woman' should be able to use the same bathroom as a 12-year old biological (xx) girl. The dems and independents have daughters too.

Unfortunately; most of the Republicans are feckless, spineless cowards who want to be "liked" by the media and DC establishment that hates them anyway.

[Hiddigeigei]

"Of course they did not answer! None of them are biologists! /s"
I am a biologist with a PhD who as a graduate student assistant taught labs in developmental biology. Some of me fellow conservative may not like what I'm going to say.
Most women have XX chromosomes in their somatic cells. Most men have XY. There are so-called "super males" with two Y chromosomes and an X. There are women with three X chromosomes. They tend to have long legs and are usually quite attractive. Then there are the teratological "monsters" (old term) that include the hermaphrodites with both sexual organs (arising from developmental or double fertilization) and the chimera who have cells from different sperm in different parts of their body. The monsters are relatively few in number and deserve our sympathy.

[mombonn]

The Bible says, “woe to those who calll good evil, and evil good”. I would add for the idiots who refuse to define woman”, Forrest Gump says “stupid is as stupid does”.