Posted on 11/14/2020 6:18:10 AM PST by Evil Slayer
EVEN AFTER THE ELECTORIAL COLLEGE VOTES AND EVER AFTER THE PRESIDENT ELECT (biden) IS SWORN IN, CAN SCOTUS OVERTURN THIS AND GIVE IT TO TRUMP IF FRAUD AGAINST TRUMP PROVES HE WON?
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonmonthly.com ...
Not in this case. There are safe harbors established.
Was SC an appellant court in Gore vs Bush?
Yes, SCOTUS sat as an appellate court. The case, however, was Bush v. Gore, taken up from the Supreme Court of Florida.
https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep531098/
Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000)
GEORGE W. BUSH, ET AL., PETITIONERS v.
ALBERT GORE, JR., ET AL.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
[December 12, 2000]
PER CURIAM.
I
On December 8, 2000, the Supreme Court of Florida ordered that the Circuit Court of Leon County tabulate by hand 9,000 ballots in Miami-Dade County.
[snip]
Or, as likely will happen if any case gets to the USSC (and as it almost always does sans a ruling by Roberts) it will rule very, very narrowly on the PA law in such a way as to preclude any spillover to other states.
I’d look for this.
Thanks for the information.
no (notice the lower case)
You might follow my Twitter thread @LarrySchweikart not for me but for my court guru, “Zen Master,” who ALWAYS gets it right when it comes to the courts, even when he doesn’t agree with what he thinks will happen.
I DONT KNOW. I GUESS WHAT I REALLY MEAN IS, I’M NOT SURE.
It's fraud that changed the outcome.
It is a very basic principle of law that you cannot use deadlines, statutes of limitations etc to perfect a fraud. Fraud is fraud.
Both GA and PA have set up ballot validation rules that are inconsistent with the rules established by the respective state legislatures.
The rule focused on in PA is deadline of reciept, but that is not the only rule that has play.
Not disagreeing that SCOTUS will rule narrowly. My point is that each state is likely to present unique fact issue. SCOTUS will find it difficult to take one case and reject the others. If they take any case at all.
Maybe.
The USSC does not have original jurisdiction in criminal cases.
Thanks for the information. I know there is a lot of confusion about all of this, but I’ll have to leave it all up to our Lord in Heaven who is watching over us. I’m near 78 years old and have severe health problems. Don’t expect to make it through the next 4 years. Looking forward to leaving this behind me and being with Him but at the same time will grieve for those left behind and have to go through all this evil that will be with them until they also pass away.
God BLESS you and keep you!
The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in cases against a State and it is several states that are the defendants here.
True but irrelevant.
Do you honestly think the Senate will reject properly certified electors?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.