Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IBM Just Committed to Having a Functioning 1,000 Qubit Quantum Computer by 2023
www.sciencealert.com ^ | 18 SEPTEMBER 2020 | DAVID NIELD

Posted on 09/18/2020 12:34:34 PM PDT by Red Badger

We're still a long way from realising the full potential of quantum computing, but scientists are making progress all the time – and as a sign of what might be coming, IBM now says it expects to have a 1,000 qubit machine up and running by 2023.

Qubits are the quantum equivalents of classical computing bits, able to be set not just as a 1 or a 0, but as a superposition state that can represent both 1 and 0 at the same time. This deceptively simple property has the potential to revolutionise the amount of computing power at our disposal.

With the IBM Quantum Condor planned for 2023 – running 1,121 qubits, to be exact – we should start to see quantum computers start to tackle a substantial number of genuine real-world calculations, rather than being restricted to laboratory experiments.

"We think of Condor as an inflection point, a milestone that marks our ability to implement error correction and scale up our devices, while simultaneously complex enough to explore potential Quantum Advantages – problems that we can solve more efficiently on a quantum computer than on the world's best supercomputers," writes physicist Jay Gambetta, IBM Fellow and Vice President of IBM Quantum.

It's a bold target to set, considering IBM's biggest quantum computer to date holds just 65 qubits. The company says it plans to have a 127-qubit machine ready in 2021, a 433-qubit one available in 2022, and a computer holding a million qubits at... some unspecified point in the future.

Today's quantum computers require very delicate, ultra-cold setups and are easily knocked off course by almost any kind of atmospheric interference or noise – not ideal if you're trying to crunch some numbers on the quantum level.

What having more qubits does is provide better error correction, a crucial process in any computer that makes sure calculations are accurate and reliable, and reduces the impact of interference.

The complex nature of quantum computing means error correction is more of a challenge than normal. Unfortunately, getting qubits to play nice together is incredibly difficult, which is why we're only seeing quantum computers with qubits in the 10's right now.

Around 1,000 qubits in total still wouldn't be enough to take on full-scale quantum computing challenges, but it would be enough to maintain a small number of stable, logical qubit systems that could then interact with each other.

And while it would take more like a million qubits to truly realise the potential of quantum computing, we're seeing steady progress each year – from achieving quantum teleportation between computer chips, to simulating chemical reactions.

IBM hopes that by committing itself to these targets, it can better focus its quantum computing efforts, and that other companies working in the same space will know what to expect over the coming years – adding a little bit of certainty to an unpredictable field.

"We've gotten to the point where there is enough aggregate investment going on, that it is really important to start having coordination mechanisms and signaling mechanisms so that we're not grossly misallocating resources and we allow everybody to do their piece," technologist Dario Gil, senior executive at IBM, told TechCrunch.

https://techcrunch.com/2020/09/15/ibm-publishes-its-quantum-roadmap-says-it-will-have-a-1000-qubit-machine-in-2023/


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; History; Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 09/18/2020 12:34:34 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker; ShadowAce

Ping!........................


2 posted on 09/18/2020 12:34:59 PM PDT by Red Badger (Sine Q-Anon.....................very............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
?


3 posted on 09/18/2020 12:38:19 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

I actually have that game......................


4 posted on 09/18/2020 12:39:07 PM PDT by Red Badger (Sine Q-Anon.....................very............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Reminds me of an old Bill Cosby routine;

"Riiiight. What's a cubit?"


5 posted on 09/18/2020 12:39:11 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (If liberals had a conscience, they wouldn't be liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I read an article about Quantum Computing recently that stated if and when Quantum Computing becomes real and functions in real world applications the uses are unlimited.

For example, all current military grade encryption could be broken in a matter of a few minutes...


6 posted on 09/18/2020 12:39:52 PM PDT by srmanuel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I will wait until they are on sale in 2024.


7 posted on 09/18/2020 12:41:09 PM PDT by Arcadian Empire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: srmanuel
functions in real world applications the uses are unlimited.

But mostly pron.

8 posted on 09/18/2020 12:41:35 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pmCMAyUjpE


9 posted on 09/18/2020 12:41:47 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

will it be able to solve Pi?


10 posted on 09/18/2020 12:42:56 PM PDT by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The first qubit computers I've seen had each qubit in a separate liquid nitrogen container separated by several feet strung down a hallway.

Have they done anything to compress the size?

Also, I believe that qubit computers can only solve certain types of problems because very few algorithms have been developed that will allow technologists to take advantage of the qubit architecture.

11 posted on 09/18/2020 12:45:49 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
MMMM prons!


12 posted on 09/18/2020 12:47:09 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

LOL, I like Stewie.


13 posted on 09/18/2020 12:49:12 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Well, now they are down to being in the same room!........................


14 posted on 09/18/2020 12:49:41 PM PDT by Red Badger (Sine Q-Anon.....................very............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
IBM's quantum computing lab. (Connie Zhou for IBM)
15 posted on 09/18/2020 12:50:21 PM PDT by Red Badger (Sine Q-Anon.....................very............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad

Only pumpkin.


16 posted on 09/18/2020 12:50:44 PM PDT by Highest Authority (DemonRats are pure EVIL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad

Or the square root of -1?..................


17 posted on 09/18/2020 12:51:11 PM PDT by Red Badger (Sine Q-Anon.....................very............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Qubits are the quantum equivalents of classical computing bits, able to be set not just as a 1 or a 0, but as a superposition state that can represent both 1 and 0 at the same time. This deceptively simple property has the potential to revolutionise the amount of computing power at our disposal.

qubit [קיוביט] = 137 = kabbalah [קבלה]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/137_(number)#In_esoterism

18 posted on 09/18/2020 12:52:34 PM PDT by Ezekiel (The pun is mightier than the s-word. Goy to the World!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

“How long can you tread water?”


19 posted on 09/18/2020 12:53:06 PM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I don’t know what this means, but it’s interesting!


20 posted on 09/18/2020 12:55:11 PM PDT by proud American in Canada (In these trying times, "Give me Liberty or Give me Death!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson