|
Posted on 04/30/2019 11:29:37 AM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this transformation as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3028)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #1 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
To me, the derps’ behavior stinks of desperation.
My anger is tempered by that knowledge. I’m kind of enjoying watching them squirm.
“I passed the area there are two large tents in place at the Border Patrol facility and another one next to the Texdot facilities””
Prayers up for you and your family.
What a mess our country is in.
Dems need to wake up to this fact: He is the Attorney General, and he knows things.
They will be very sorry they started this poop storm.
SwallHell stated that HE couldn’t view the report, only the majority leader and head of the committee could view it.
*************
If the Dem leadership says a regular everyday Dem Congresscritter can’t view the report, the Dem Congresscritter better not view the report, or they will suffer the consequences.
So, SwallHell logically knows even though he has the ability, and the opportunity, he better not.
I think his name is Mr. NoNadler.
Barr was amazingly calm, composed, and courteous in the face of hostility from the derps.
How did he manage to stay so calm? IMO, it’s because he KNOWS WHAT’S COMING. He knows that all of the attackers are going down. He’s like an adult in a room full of toddlers. They can throw all the tantrums they want to, but they are powerless in the face of facts and reality.
I think Barr knows it’s just a matter of time, that he needs to participate in this step of the process, and he’s not going to screw up by losing his cool. I think the derps know it’s just a matter of time and they are panicking.
Swallowwell is the rattest of rats. If ever a face and attitude were made for the Smarm Hall-O-Fame, he’s got it made in spades.
If it was high noon, and he told me it was daylight outside, I’d throw open a door and look just to be sure. (Where do the dems find all these detestables anyway? Their souls seem to be mangled or even missing.)
I hope you got it right.
~~~~~~
LOL, my FRiend!
If for no other reason, just the privilege of watching your gung fu and effectiveness multiply -- has been worth the effort of hanging around these Q threads!!
ThanQ for all you do for us!!!
Seriously, (...for a change...)
TXnMA
P.S. I'm secretly envious of your awesome logo! '-)
P.P.S. NoHomo!
That's what I thought. He was talking to them very patiently, explaining things like he was dealing with a 2-year old in the midst of a temper tantrum.
Ruskie sub prolly in close to pick up short wave from nel ohr?
They’re doing to Barr what they have done to Trump, delegitimizing him and getting their allies in the MockingBird Media to repeat it endlsessly. Then, when he prosecutes those who have committed heinous crimes, the dems will scream that it’s all political and he’s acting like the Soviet secret police, dragging good upstanding derps away in the middle of the night. The idiots will not be swayed, and we will still have a bunch of antifa and snowflakes who make it into the lawful folks who are the bad guys.
We have the law on our side and can win the prosecution battles, but it will take a couple generations to regain the rule of law in this country. And a lot of deportations. And some control of social media, and maybe some FEC review of the political donation that the budgets of every MSM outlet provide to democrats.
AS NOTED PREVIOUSLY ALL PARTS OF THIS FIVE PART SERIES CAN BE FOUND AS REPLIES TO THE JUMPING DINOSAUR, POST 9 OF THIS THREAD
PART FIVE
BARR HEARING ABOUT MUELLER REPORT BEFORE SENATE JUDICIARY CMTE
[TEXOKIE NOTES/TAKEAWAYS - Not a transcript]
5/1/19
CRUZ
Affirms the successful legal career of AG. Thanks him for taking the job, knowing that he would be given the Kavenaugh treatment. Affirms that Barr is performing ably.
Thinks the hearing has been revealing. “Russia” did not come up very much at all in the hearing. We heard little of many who had accused the POTUS of treason. Most concerns of the dems was about the Mueller letter. Their argument is:
AG receives report and releases the 4 page of conclusions.
Mueller asks for the release of the Exec Summaries which he had drafted - 19 pages
Two weeks later those Exec summaries are released within the entire report. 448 pages.
Their argument is that the report/exec summaries were delayed.
If that is their arguments, it is exceptionally weak. If you are hiding something, you are doing a very lousy job of hiding it. The very thing you are supposedly hiding was RELEASED to Congress and the American People.
In your judgement was the Mueller report thorough?
B: yes,
C: did they expend enormous time, energy and resources?
B: yes
C: And the Mueller report stated flat out that the investigation and evidence does not support criminal charges?
B: Thats right
C: And indeed, the Mueller report was compiled by 19 lawyers on the team, approx 40 FBI agents, 2,800 subpoenas, 500 search warrants, ….. and 500 witnesses.
We have investigated over and over again and the substance of the accusations leveled against the POTUS for over 2 1/2 years have magically disappeared. Instead, the complaint is the 19 pages that we didn’t get to see right away.
Cruz addresses the DOJ under Obama was politicized and weaponized to go after the POTUS (obama) enemies. Would you agree that politicizing and weaponizing the DOJ to go after political opponents is an abuse of power?
B: I think it is an abuse of power no matter who does it,
C: Of course.
To the best of your knowledge, when did surveillance of the Trump campaign begin?
B: The position today is that it was July, but I do not know the answer.
C: It is an unusual thing, is it not for DOJ to be investigating a presidential campaign, particularly the opposing campaign of those in power.
B: yes
C: Do we know if the Obama Admin investigated any other candidates running for President?
B: IDK
C: Did they wiretap?
B: I guess they were investigating Hillary Clinton for the email.
C: Do we know if there were wiretaps?
B: IDK
C: do we know if there were efforts to send investigators in wearing a wire?
B: IDK
C: So General Barr, I would urge that you have been very transparent in your promise regarding that wrt the Mueller report. You promised you would released the report, and you have released it. Anyone can read it.
I ask you to bring the same transparency as to whether the previous administration politicized the DOJ, targeted political rivals and used intelligence assets to surveil them improperly.
B: [Nods and mouths, “Yes.”]
GRAHAM
End of first round. And they are doing 3 minute lightening round
LEAHY:
Gets into Australia and Russians (He was difficult to understand.)
He brings up the March 4 letter. He says the Spec Counsel DID find evidence of underlying crime - hush payments - campaign finance laws. I was not sure of the question, but basically, he asks Barr if he got the data correct, and Barr affirms that he did.
Will you agree not to interfere with the ongoing investigations?
B: I will supervise those investigations as AG.
L: Will you agree to disallow undue interference from the White House?
B: Yes.
Barr reminds of his discussion in confirmation hearings to use his office to keep investigations from being influenced by politics.
L : [Something about turning the Mueller report over to Congress.]
B: States that Mueller would not have meant for the Congress to have all the materials over to congress.
B talks about the point of absence of underlying crime. However He also states the Prez, if an investigation is unfounded, the Prez does not have to let it run its course. He can terminate such a proceeding and it would not indicate corrupt intent, because he was being falsely accused and that is an important point. He WAS being falsely accused. Durban of course didn’t agree.
DURBAN:
Counter intelligence July 2016 - brings up Wikileaks, PapaD, …. Do you believe this was a proper predicate to start an investigation?
B would have to see what has been documented about Downer. B is not seeing the correlation to the Russians and foreknowledge of the hack.
D: April 16 Barr received a waiver regarding Malaysian company about alleged money laundering. He is wondering if a Malaysian national illegally donated to the Trump campaign.
How many waivers have you received to involve yourself in matters involving Trump campaign, businesses, or Trump inaugural committee.
B: None
D: asked why was this waiver sought [there was some kind of ethics concern about Goldman Sachs being a client of a law firm Barr had been involved with]
B: said he didn’t seek it out, he was asked to seek a waiver in this case.
[B consults with someone - the Criminal Division requested he seek the waiver. He is told Mr. Benchkowski is the head of the division. ]
He was the head of the Criminal Division and apparently they discussed it with the Career ethics guys and and they made the recommendation.
[LOL! That shut down Durban!]
WHITEHOUSE
He talks about Mueller speaking to Barr about not making the determination on Obstruction, and leaving it to Barr.
Barr: He didn’t say he was leaving it to me.
WH: 24th M sent B a letter about the decision.
B: had actually started discussing it March 5. Made the decision on Sunday the 24th. Durban confused because that is the same day Mueller sent him the letter about his concerns about the exec summaries.
WH: when did B get the draft of Mueller report
B: only got the report - no draft. Got it on the 22nd.
WH: You made the final decision on 24th?
B: several discussions before then but final decision was 24th.
Discussions and consideration of some of these issues had been taking place even before March 5. Dept had been in regular contact with the Mueller people.
My understanding is that the Deputy had been getting briefings. We also needed to get the Mueller team assistance regarding the grand jury redaction material.
D: there was a brown bag lunch on June 27th. Can you assure me that nothing related to obstruction was discussed with OLC office of legal counsel?
B: Yes. We did not discuss it at the brown bag lunch, although I did tell them I would send a memo… but did not tell them at that lunch.
KLOBUCHAR
[Sorry - still a JennyAss of monumental proportions]
Asked for confirmation if Mueller had reviewed the POTUS taxes.
B: IDK
K: Can I find out if I give you a written question?
B: Yes, or you can ask Bob Mueller when he comes here.
She discusses different actions [totality of the evidence/ pattern]
There are 3 US cases which she cites.
B: Intent has to be proved to a level of reasonable doubt. He says the problem in the Report is trying determine the subjective intent a facially lawful act and permits a lot of selectivity on part of the prosecutors. We [DOJ] are skeptical of this approach because it is difficult to achieve the level of beyond a reasonable doubt.
K: Talks of Barr’s confirmation - something about he said something about abuse of Presidential Power, not just Pardon Power.
Has president faithfully executed the laws?
B: Evidence in the report is conflicting the the report does not come to a conclusion, so I made the decision.
BLUMENTHAL
Brings up the conversation between Barr and Mueller after the summary was issued. He called you?
B: No I called him.
Blum: what prompted you to call
B: the letter
Blum: How long was conversation?
B: About 10-15 minutes. There were several witnesses in the room; he was on the speaker phone
Blum: who was in the room?
B: RR was there among others, AG staff and Deputy staff
Blum: How did the conversation go?
B: Bob what is concern? He said that they were concerned about the press coverage- was indicating a lack of context about the non-finding about obstruction. Mueller wanted the exec summaries to be released. Barr said he would like to get it out all at once rather than piecemeal - but he would think about it. The next day he put out a letter that made it clear that no one should read the March 24 letter as a summary report. And that a full account of Mueller’s thinking would be in the report.
Blum characterizes the Mueller letter being a rebuke of the AG.
Barr: Yeah, the letter is a bit snitty and was probably written by one of his staff people.
[ROFL!!!!]
Blum: Did you or anyone document that conversation with Mueller?
B: Yes, someone did take notes.
Blum: May we have those notes?
B: No.
Blum: why not?
B: Why should you have them?
GRAHAM COMES IN BECAUSE THE TIME IS OVER.
He states he will write a letter to Mr. Mueller and “I’m going to ask him if there is anything about that conversation he disagrees with and if so then he can come and tell us. So the hearing is now over - Mr Blumenthal, I promise you that Mr. Mueller will have the chance to make sure the conversation as related by Mr Barr is accurate. I’m going to give him a chance to correct anything he says is incorrect of inaccurate and that will be it. “
Lee given 5 seconds:
He uses it thanking Barr for service to our country. And for civility and composure today in what was a needlessly and unfairly hostile environment. Your professionalism has been remarkable. I thank you.
Graham closed with brief comment about how overall the committee did pretty good - only fell into the ditch a couple of times, and it is the stuff of democracy. Thank you for being our Attorney General.
Graham adjourns the hearing.
[One of the things I noticed is that normally I would rather have a giant boil on my nose than listen to the democrats in these hearings. What I was most amazed at was that they gave him actually very little time to say anything. The dems mostly postured and impugned him. The repubs were a little better, but often they would just present points as questions, and Barr would affirm as to the truth [or not] in them.
I also am aware that there are very probably some errors or misapprehensions which I have written down, or omitted. I have sought to take notes as best as I am equipped to do without making an outright transcript, and wanted to share them with our Thread. ]
THE END
QQQQ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
Thanks for taking one for team!
You just might have a point there, and one that would make perfect sense...
I had a HAM license once, and it is a ‘spy’ way of doing things I heard many times...
No kidding. I can't watch those nasty bloated liars.
Thanks from me, too, TEX
nite
New Sarah Carter:
Barr is the Man for the Job
You’re most welcome...
And I am honored!
Thanks!
~Easy
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
