Q Anon: 10/29/18 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 10/29/18 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

	“Trust The Plan”
YouTube	President Trump	This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube	Storm Is Upon Us	Q - We Are The Plan - 6 min
YouTube	Joe Masepoes	Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction Also, Stormisuponus on Bitchute
Threadreader	Jason Wright	Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Threadreader	ImperatorRex	A thread on how Team Trump is preparing the normies for what is coming. Also, @Imperator_Rex on GAB.AI - overview
Twitter	Paul Serran	What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Article	Sundance	Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview
Medium	Martin Geddes	WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
	“Pay Attention”
Thread	Qmap.pub	Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread	Qanon.app	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Thread	Qanonposts.com	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Website	We-go-all.net	Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website	Qntmpkts.keybase.pub	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
	“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread	Anonymous	QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Oracles	Bagster	Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread
Lexicon	Swordmaker	LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Website	Whitehouse	Whitehouse.gov - President Trump's Executive Orders, Proclamations, Nominations, WH press briefings and news
Website	FBI	vault.fbi.gov - new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media
Website	State Dept.	foia.state.gov - Virtual Reading Room Documents Search
Table	FReeQs	Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
	“Power to the People”
YouTube	Praying Medic	Series of videos explaining Q-drops. Also, his own website
Twitter	Praying Medic	Immediate reactions to Q-drop. Also, his own website
YouTube	Dustin Nemos	Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent. Also, @NemoV on GAB.AI
Twitter	ImperatorRex	Includes Q-drop reactions. Also, @Imperator_Rex on GAB.AI
Twitter	Neonrevolt	Includes highly detailed, investigative Q-drop reactions Also, @NeonRevolt on GAB.AI
GAB.AI	Thomas_Wictor	Includes excellent analysis of the Swamp
Twitter	Lisa Mei Crowley	Includes Q-drop reactions. Also, @lisamei62 on GAB.AI
Thread	SkyPilot	Story of Q - collection of Q information
	“Silent Majority No More”
Website	White House	Email the White House with your support and suggestions
Website	Congress	Email Congress with your support and suggestions
Website	roserambles.org	Q Cards
Thread	Little Jeremiah	Memes
	“Fight, Fight, Fight!”
YouTube	President Reagan	A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images
YouTube	President Kennedy	The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies

[blu]

Acceptable 'turn on' comms? [Filter applied - legal analysis]

Q means that the comms have been vetted by the lawyers to make sure they're not violating the Hatch Act. I'm assuming that the military is majorly in on Q...and as long as Q doesn't tell us who to vote for, no violation.

[lyby]

you can turn off that red screen in chrome...

**********************

Thank you for your kind, helpful reply.

[Snowybear]

Maybe someone can do the digging and see if military intellegence is subject to the Hatch Act.

[Snowybear]

> He “campaigned” strongly for Kavanaugh, though I don’t know if that qualifies.

Doesn’t qualify. Only for elections.

> After giving this some thought, I think the FReeQ was right who said that this issue may be why Q went dark for so long. It may have been in response to the derp [6] letter and while seeking “legal analysis”.

That would be me.

[bagster]

Acceptable 'turn on' comms?
[Filter applied - legal analysis]

And to further simplify this clause, I think the FReeQ brain trust seems to be in agreement that Q is saying here that, after legal analysis and the proper filters (those releasing information) being in place, that the Q "comms" are "acceptable".

#PartyOn.

It's quite reasonable to assume that the 23 day hiatus was due to getting the legal analysis, as Cletus said.

All the FReeQs were right, btw, who many days ago thought Q was dark due to Hatch Act considerations.

You guys are good. I walk amongst giants.

Bagster

[DAVEY CROCKETT]

I was going to be real kool. Ha I got this link to explain codes and I put this one in...kek

Still not sure what it means...

!!mG7VJxZNCI

Here’s the link for smarter than me....

http://www.gematrinator.com/calculator/index.OHL

I am too old for this $het, too tried for this $het and too sober for this $het

[bagster]

Sometimes I feel like a cheese spreader.

🤣

[TruthWillWin]

New Q 2390

[Bob Ireland]

Looks like you had it worked out with Q to wait for your return! 🕵️

[DAVEY CROCKETT]

FYI hope this hasn't been posted yet, it was just on my phone no idea where it came from... Strange strange days on the WWW WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history “Only small secrets need to be protected. The large ones are kept secret by the public’s incredulity.”  — Marshall McLuhan (HT @LionelMedia) https://medium.com/@martingeddes/wwg1wga-the-greatest-communications-event-in-history-698ba926df64

[stars & stripes forever]

CAPTION THIS PICTURE...

SOURCE...
Democrats FREAK: Obama Can’t Fill Arena & Loses Control In Wild-Eyed Shrieking Rant

[bagster]

Maybe someone can do the digging and see if military intellegence is subject to the Hatch Act.

Check out the graphic in Q post #2388.

In the green box in the left hand column, there's a long list of Intelligence agencies that it DOES apply to. On that list is the Defense Intelligence Agency and a lot of other Intelligence agencies, including the NSA.

I'm not sure where "military intelligence" falls into that list, or if it even does.

That's why I brought this up. I have to think there is a "filter" in place between these qualified agencies and Q. Or slse that would be bad? Hatch Act-wise?

What the court will look at, and the derps try to say, is the information comes from these agencies, no matter the filter. In effect, those qualifying government agencies are violating the Hatch Act. That will be the derp position.

BUT. Q says they have legal analysis that protects them. A strong enough one that they are continuing.

So I don't think we have to worry. And, I say again. Whose court? Our court.

Case closed.

Bailiff, remove these derps from the courtroom.

p.s. We knew the derps would make this move at the beginning of Q. It's the obvious play. I thought it would be more of a "national security" angle, and they might still try that next.

I also thought they'd wait until Q was publicly acknowledged and indisputable.

Wrong.

Bagster

[bagster]

That would be me.

🏆

👍

Bagster

[little jeremiah]

at times you, as do I, might feel like a paring knife among filet knives and bread knives...

Sometimes I feel like a cheese spreader.

Sometimes I feel like a spork.

[Califreak]

Ha!

I am but a dull butter knife but I’m glad to be in this drawer.

:)

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Thank you for the follow up on that linked story. It was so bizarre yet believable. Happy to learn it’s a fake!

[Califreak]

I’m not so sure the story is fake but the websites it was on were.

[DAVEY CROCKETT]

I think the tweet has be removed it won’t get removed on this site...top of page Lucyt

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1219008/pg328

[Califreak]

OMG it’s a meat puppet!

Is it a droid?

Dang.