Posted on 10/29/2018 10:24:41 PM PDT by ransomnote
Q means that the comms have been vetted by the lawyers to make sure they're not violating the Hatch Act. I'm assuming that the military is majorly in on Q...and as long as Q doesn't tell us who to vote for, no violation.
you can turn off that red screen in chrome...
**********************
Thank you for your kind, helpful reply.
Maybe someone can do the digging and see if military intellegence is subject to the Hatch Act.
> He “campaigned” strongly for Kavanaugh, though I don’t know if that qualifies.
Doesn’t qualify. Only for elections.
> After giving this some thought, I think the FReeQ was right who said that this issue may be why Q went dark for so long. It may have been in response to the derp [6] letter and while seeking “legal analysis”.
That would be me.
And to further simplify this clause, I think the FReeQ brain trust seems to be in agreement that Q is saying here that, after legal analysis and the proper filters (those releasing information) being in place, that the Q "comms" are "acceptable".
#PartyOn.
It's quite reasonable to assume that the 23 day hiatus was due to getting the legal analysis, as Cletus said.
All the FReeQs were right, btw, who many days ago thought Q was dark due to Hatch Act considerations.
You guys are good. I walk amongst giants.
Bagster
I was going to be real kool. Ha I got this link to explain codes and I put this one in...kek
Still not sure what it means...
!!mG7VJxZNCI
Here’s the link for smarter than me....
http://www.gematrinator.com/calculator/index.OHL
I am too old for this $het, too tried for this $het and too sober for this $het
SOURCE...
Democrats FREAK: Obama Cant Fill Arena & Loses Control In Wild-Eyed Shrieking Rant
Check out the graphic in Q post #2388.
In the green box in the left hand column, there's a long list of Intelligence agencies that it DOES apply to. On that list is the Defense Intelligence Agency and a lot of other Intelligence agencies, including the NSA.
I'm not sure where "military intelligence" falls into that list, or if it even does.
That's why I brought this up. I have to think there is a "filter" in place between these qualified agencies and Q. Or slse that would be bad? Hatch Act-wise?
What the court will look at, and the derps try to say, is the information comes from these agencies, no matter the filter. In effect, those qualifying government agencies are violating the Hatch Act. That will be the derp position.
BUT. Q says they have legal analysis that protects them. A strong enough one that they are continuing.
So I don't think we have to worry. And, I say again. Whose court? Our court.
Case closed.
Bailiff, remove these derps from the courtroom.
p.s. We knew the derps would make this move at the beginning of Q. It's the obvious play. I thought it would be more of a "national security" angle, and they might still try that next.
I also thought they'd wait until Q was publicly acknowledged and indisputable.
Wrong.
Bagster
Bagster
Sometimes I feel like a cheese spreader.
Sometimes I feel like a spork.
Ha!
I am but a dull butter knife but I’m glad to be in this drawer.
:)
Thank you for the follow up on that linked story. It was so bizarre yet believable. Happy to learn its a fake!
I’m not so sure the story is fake but the websites it was on were.
I think the tweet has be removed it won’t get removed on this site...top of page Lucyt
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1219008/pg328
OMG it’s a meat puppet!
Is it a droid?
Dang.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.