Posted on 10/15/2018 9:03:34 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
The missing MH370 flight has been captured by Google Maps on multiple occasions since it disappeared in March 2014, according to tech expert Ian Wilson, who is planning an expedition to confirm his findings...
But Mr Wilson, told Dailystar.co.uk exclusively he believes he has spotted the aeroplane crashed in the Cambodian jungle on Google Maps and the company's time stamps may reveal when the pictures were taken.
The latest copyright data is listed as the year 2018, with recent imagery data listed as March 2017.
However, last week the app listed the imagery data as December 2015.
The same image showing the plane was also spotted in 2014, just weeks after its apparent crash, raising questions as to when it was taken.
Mr Wilson believes MH370 may have been snapped more than once by the satellites, which would confirm the image shows a crashed plane, instead of one in flight.
He said: "Whether it has been updated at all is questionable, regardless of the data Google gives it.
"And if the plane was visible in 2014 as well and updates have been applied, then the plane must be there and not caught in flight."
Mr Wilson has promised to check for himself by travelling to Cambodia and trekking to the site where the plane was spotted.
He said: "The plan is still for me and my brother Jackie to go inside in the next few weeks.
"After much discussion last night, we're just organising final vaccinations and the hiring of guides."
...The brothers intend to fly out on 15th October.
(Excerpt) Read more at express.co.uk ...
That's his next move, if not a chopper, definitely by air.
Ahh...thanks...it was Graham McTavish in RAMBO 2008 whom I was thinking of.
It was ALIENS!
The chances of 370 sitting in the jungle are pretty slim. More likely it’s been repainted, the idents changed and it’s flying as a freighter right now.
The plane didn't land anywhere, it crashed and fell into some currently unknown number of pieces, possibly as a result of a fire in the 500 pounds of lithium-ion batteries in the cargo. So, it isn't flying anywhere.
You said the plane was intact.
I was responding that ot wasn’t.
Now you are saying something totally different. Which is it?
The picture does not show an intact plan nor does it shw attached wings or an attached tail section. The plane is abnormally short. Anyone around planes will tell you that.
As far as the wings go, plenty f jungle crashes in which the wings sheared but were within distance of the fuselage. Stop watching movies and you might get a clearer perspective.
Also, something you seemed to have missed is that the wings that appear near the fuselage are not full size. They are too short for the aircraft.
‘
Since the entire scene is not in the picture then one can be sure where the rest of the plane is. However, looking to the left appears to be grayish white images as well. Leading to the belief that there are other parts of the plane on the way to the final resting place.
Again I don’t say this is the specific plane in question but appears to be a plane that has crashed.
USAF - 9 years, USAF Aircraft accident investigation boards - 3, aerospace industry for 16 years...Does that qualify?
Get over yourself.
It is an image greatly magnified and of poor resolution. Pixelization can also affect the visuals.
We will only know if this story is true when it grows legs...or dies.
Is it any wonder why the Navy has more planes than the Air Force.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.